Undoing Bush’s Wage Cut

Kudos to Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.) and 171 of his Democratic colleagues for introducing legislation to undo the president’s executive order that suspended the Davis-Bacon Act along the Gulf Coast, allowing federal contractors to pay local workers less money on construction projects.

Representative George Miller (D-CA) introduced legislation [Sept. 13] that would undo President Bush’s proclamation…that cuts wages for workers involved in the reconstruction of areas damaged or destroyed by Hurricane Katrina and its subsequent flooding.

“As workers in the Gulf Coast go about rebuilding their communities, they must also earn wages that will begin to help them rebuild their own lives,” said Miller, the senior Democrat on the House Education and the Workforce Committee. “This legislation would undo President Bush’s grievous anti-worker action and ensure that workers on federal construction projects earn a decent wage for their hard work.”

Under federal law, companies that win federal construction contracts must pay workers the prevailing wage – the wage typical for their specific job function in the local area where the work is being completed. Bush’s proclamation suspends this wage requirement indefinitely in areas affected by Hurricane Katrina, including parts of Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Florida. Miller’s legislation would overturn the President’s proclamation.

“While the Administration is giving out no-bid contracts that fail to protect the taxpayer, it is also exploiting Hurricane Katrina to undermine the wages of the most desperate workers in our country. This is the most callous and misguided step the Administration could take at this time,” said Miller.

As Josh Marshall noted yesterday, the bill, H.R. 3763, has exactly zero Republican co-sponsors. (New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg (R) decried Bush’s move on this, but he’s not in Congress, so he doesn’t count.)

This bill is definitely worth keeping an eye on. I suspect it’s going to be — or at least should be — a principal focus of House Dems in the coming weeks. Also, I’d be even more encouraged if Senate Dems picked up on this and introduce a companion bill.

Post Script: This is just a tangent, but what’s up with Rep. Tom Price (R) of Georgia? Price, a far-right but relatively low-profile lawmaker from Georgia, seems a little confused about all of this. On Sept. 13, he praised Bush for suspending Davis-Bacon. On Sept. 14, he signed on as a co-sponsor to H.R. 3763, which would have overturned Bush’s decision. On Sept. 15, Price withdrew his support. Was he just not paying attention?

It’s easy to imagine this becoming a problem for the GOP. Who wants to stand up for lower wages for workers hurt by a disaster?

  • The Dem battle cry should be People not Profits. Regarding another outrage last week I said, “How dare you, Mr. President?” I say it again here. How can anyone justify this action? What is the defense for this? Does it make any more or better work happen? No. Does it help the reconstruction start sooner or move faster? No. So what is to be gained from this?

    George W. Bush you are a scumbag. The worst kind of lying asshole. You make life harder for people who need help, and then pretend that everyone has an even chance of succeeding. If the Lord speaks to or through you, as you claim, you either are missing the point or ignoring the message entirely.

    As for no Republicans signing on as co-sponsors, we are watching, and this vote, if ever taken, should and will come back to haunt you next year. Dems should put all lawmakers on the spot with this one, like the anti-tax pledges of right wing groups.

  • Whatever happened to the conservative’s core conviction of free markets? Prevailing wages are the result of a region’s overall economy and the supply/demand for labor. In other words, market forces.

    And could one of them explain to me how no bid contracts fit into any concept of market – free or otherwise?

  • While I too am outraged at this action, I am glad to see Dems doing something about it. My fear is that it is too little, too late.

    The worst part about this is that the Halliburton’s and others who will be hired by the government with OUR tax dollars, will benefit doubly because they will be able to underpay the construction people they hire.

    Morals indeed.

  • I sent a letter to my senator ( Norm Coleman ) about this. I got a reply with lots of double talk and no real answer. He also told me why we need to eliminate the death tax. To save small business and family farms. I wrote him back and told him to save the BS for his followers.

  • John Edwards, “I might have missed something, but I don’t think the president ever talked about putting a cap on the salaries of the CEOs of Halliburton and the other companies . . . who are getting all these contracts,”

  • Hey, cowboy, way to stick it to Coleman. He’s my senator, too, and I get the same crap back from him when I write.

    This whole business is an outrage. It’s beyond obscene for Halliburton and Bectel, et al to once again profit from a national tragedy. It’s mainly low and middle class men and women dying in Iraq, and it will be lower and middle class citizens working these jobs. To reduce their wages is tantamount to punishing them for surviving the hurricane.

    I hope Dems in both the House and Senate keep the spotlight on this. In my opinion, nothing reveals the true motives of this administration more clearly than these two moves: granting no-bid contracts to the usual suspects and reducing wages for people who do all the heavy lifting.

    The rich get richer and the rest get screwed. What is it going to take to wake up middle America? This is the impetus behind everything BushCo has done since taking power. You’d have to be deaf, dumb and blind not to see it! They barely bothered to cloak this move at all.

    As I’ve been instructed to call them by A.L.:

    LYING. FUCKING. BASTARDS.

    ooh, that felt good!

    Shannon

  • Comments are closed.