U.S. sees biggest unemployment jump in 22 years; McCain vows more of the same

On the economic front, the news is “ugly.”

The nation’s unemployment rate jumped to 5.5 percent in May — the biggest monthly rise since 1986 — as nervous employers cut 49,000 jobs.

The latest snapshot of business conditions showed a deeply troubled economy, with dwindling job opportunities in a time of continuing hardship in the housing, credit and financial sectors.

“It was ugly,” said Richard Yamarone, economist at Argus Research.

Of course, given the environment we’re in, economic news has an immediate impact on the political landscape, and the McCain campaign was quick to issue a statement. After noting that the rise in unemployment is a reminder of the “challenges” American families are facing, McCain said:

“…[W]e must act now to support workers, families and employers alike. This means getting our economy back on track by providing immediate tax relief, enacting a HOME plan to help those facing foreclosure, lowering health care costs, investing in innovation, moving toward energy independence and opening foreign markets to our goods. These policies will help small businesses create the jobs that families need today. The American people cannot afford more inaction from Washington.

“The wrong change for our country would be an economic agenda based upon the policies of the past that advocate higher taxes, bigger government, government-run health care and greater isolationism. To help families at this critical time, we cannot afford to go backward as Senator Obama advocates.”

As if we needed another reminder of just how far gone McCain is when it comes to the economy, his campaign offers additional evidence.

So, the economy’s in trouble and unemployment is surging. McCain says we need to cut taxes again (which hasn’t managed to help so far), pass his housing plan (written by a UBS lobbyist and created to help the industry, not families losing their homes), pass his healthcare plan (which leaves millions of Americans with pre-existing conditions behind), invest in “innovation” (though he’s actually opposed to additional spending in the federal budget), promote energy independence (despite his lacking any kind of energy policy), and more trade.

In other words, we need to keep doing exactly what we’ve been doing. More of the same. Stay the course. Stick to the policies that got us into this mess, and wait for them to stop failing. It’s bound to happen eventually.

I was especially amused by McCain’s insistence that it would be “wrong” to pursue the economic policies of the “past.” And when might that be? Does McCain mean the 1990s, when taxes were higher, unemployment was lower, growth was stronger, poverty was lower, and the deficit was non-existent? Is this the “past” McCain is anxious to avoid?

“[W]e cannot afford to go backward as Senator Obama advocates,” McCain insists. But we can afford to stick with trickle-down voodoo economics? Can anyone actually take this nonsense seriously?

For what it’s worth, the Obama campaign issued a statement of its own. It doesn’t respond to the McCain press release, because they were released around the same time:

“Today’s jobs report is deeply troubling. Last month, our economy lost 49,000 jobs and the unemployment rate saw the greatest rise in more than twenty years. This is a reminder that working families continue to bear the brunt of the failed Bush economic policies that John McCain wants to continue for another four years. In the first five months of 2008, our economy has lost 324,000 jobs, and workers’ wages once again failed to keep pace with the skyrocketing cost of health care, and college tuition, and gas. That’s why we can’t afford John McCain’s plan to spend billions of dollars on tax breaks for big corporations and wealthy CEOs, and that’s why I’m offering change that will provide working families with a middle-class tax cut, affordable health care and college, and an energy plan that will create up to five million good-paying jobs that can’t be outsourced. That’s the change the American people are looking for, and that’s how we’ll build an economy of shared prosperity once more.”

I’m going to re-post a comment from ‘way down in the discussion an earlier thread. I hope that doesn’t bother anybody.

Personally, I’d like to see Obama go a little more socialist — but not calling it that, of course.

Not long ago in this country, if a man who worked hard and honestly at his job, his middle-class family would thrive. Today, under the economic policies of George Bush and the Republicans, the policies John McCain wants to continue for another four years, both parents in a middle class family can work hard and honestly at their full time jobs and the family is still just one medical emergency or one layoff away from disaster.

John McCain doesn’t seem to think there’s anything wrong with that scenario. He sees no reason to change the policies that have made the rich richer while working family’s incomes have stagnated or shrunk.

I say there is something fundamentally wrong with a society where a family with two incomes has to worry whether they can afford to send their children to college, or worry whether they can make their next mortgage payment, or worry that they’ll lose everything if one parent gets sick.

I challenge John McCain to say that in this country, which was founded on hard work, that it’s okay with him that someone can work hard, work smart, work honestly, and still not succeed.

And I challenge John McCain to explain how cutting the taxes of millionaires will make that situation any better.

That should play well in Appalachia.

  • an energy plan that will create up to five million good-paying jobs that can’t be outsourced.

    Hmmm. Big promise.

  • In other words, we need to keep doing exactly what we’ve been doing. More of the same. Stay the course. Stick to the policies that got us into this mess, and wait for them to stop failing. It’s bound to happen eventually.

    It’s a good thing there isn’t a whole subset of Democratic voters who would just go cast their ballots for the GOP out of spite without considering any of this.

  • McCain: “we cannot afford to go backward as Senator Obama advocates”

    I guess when you’re being dragged by your heels kicking and screaming it might feel like you’re going backwards.

  • It’s not TAX relief. It’s working a job that pays well enough that you can afford to pay taxes there McScrooge.

    I think that if McScrooge keeps trying to lay down the smack on Michelle Obama, a simple ad needs to be said.

    In 2002, John McCain opposed Bush’s tax cuts. By 2004 he changed his mind. Why? Could it be because Cindy McCain is worth 100 million dollars and is one of the biggest beneficiaries of the Bush Tax Cuts? The only change McCain is interested in is to add more change into his pockets.

  • After ready both of the press releases, who do you want leading the country? Mary? anybody?

  • Unemployment numbers bounce around for various reasons.

    A few months ago, the rate went down when it was obvious the economy was weakening.

    However you slice it, the economy is not in good shape and electing a President who doesn’t understand economics would be a huge misteak.

  • So, the economy’s in trouble and unemployment is surging. McCain says we need to cut taxes again

    O.K. How about we just cut taxes to ZERO.

    According to McSame’s thinking if we did this increased tax revenues caused by the tax cut would flow into the treasury balancing the budget and boosting the economy. Right?

    It is magic.

  • Republican economics is a religion. It has its high priests, it’s Roman Curia (the Cato Institute), and its evangelists. Plenty of people take it seriously because it’s a matter of faith. Faith is the ability to believe what you know ain’t so. (Was that Mencken?)

    But lots of people change their religion during their lives, especially when they discover that the faith they’ve followed for so long is hollow on the inside.

    The 1990’s weren’t so bad. The “failed policies of the past” are those of the past eight years.

    Back to the future!

  • One of Hon. Sen. McCain’s talking points is how, despite marching in lockstep with the ‘Stay the course.’ follow the leader war strategy (I use the term loosely), he went to Iraq and after having soldiers of all ranks (presumably not the general staff that was on offer in committee) urge him to shift tactics, he reconsidered. Let’s leave aside the obvious problems with this scenario, and focus on the economy. How many on the front line, so to speak, of the American economy should it take to help convince the Senator that he should reconsider here as well? how many will he meet?

  • “The wrong change for our country would be… greater isolationism.”

    Meaning, trade isolationism. Isolationism based on never talking to adversarial nations, that’s just fine.

    Dale #2: “…an energy plan that will create up to five million good-paying jobs that can’t be outsourced.”

    Soylent Oil is people! It’s people!

    Seriously, though, relating back to the Marxist knock against Obama, this seems to be the Republican strategy: drive up unemployment until there are no more workers of the world to unite. (I guess I don’t mean that seriously, either.)

  • Commander Guy – The Republicans have coded “Tax” to mean Income Taxes & Estate Taxes only.
    Unless cutting the Payroll Taxes would mean eliminating Social Security & Medicare. Then (and only then) they would be all for cutting those payments, too

  • McCain:

    Stay the course = good change.

    Improve things = bad change.

    Heckuva campaign strategy there, Pappy.

  • I think the Obama people need to keep in better touch with the little people — yes, the “cost of health care, and college tuition, and gas…” is terrible. So is groceries, which is pretty much as elemental & universal as it gets.

    As far as McCain goes, seriously, I live in a part of the country where he gets a lot of support (though I hope to hell he doesn’t manage to carry any states here). This support is apparently based on his “toughness.” I don’t think these same people represent Bush’s 25 percenters, but they ARE the same people who voted for Bush twice.

    I thought Viagra was supposed to fix that sort of thing?

  • Once again I see cnn & msnbc pimping themselves to an inexperienced, shady, ego-maniac like obama.

    I certainly am not going to vote for someone whom has no integrity, no trustworthiness. All this bigot has done is start the racial tensions all over again.

    I hope Hillary doesn’t run with this shyster, she is too good to be affiliated with someone who has no real ideas of his own. Can’t speak unless someone else does all his writing for him. Obama & his “Lets destroy this town” wife need to go live where they can EARN the respect of the people. Not for someone who is BUYING HIS WAY INTO THE WHITEHOUSE!! AND HE SAYS REPUBLICANS ARE UNTRUSTWORTHY, HELL-O JODIE EVANS, EL-HADY, AND ALL HIS OTHER DIRTBAGS

  • KARA (Klan-Aryan-Republican Alliance) said:
    Once again I see cnn & msnbc pimping themselves to an inexperienced, shady, ego-maniac like obama.

    I certainly am not going to vote for someone whom has no integrity, no trustworthiness. All this bigot has done is start the racial tensions all over again.

    Yeah. How dare this uppity negro try to put himself in a position of authority over white people! Doesn’t he know that will spark outrage in the minds of all right-thinking Americans?

    Why can’t this boy strive to be a credit to his race?

  • “[W]e cannot afford to go backward as Senator Obama advocates,” McCain insists. But we can afford to stick with trickle-down voodoo economics? Can anyone actually take this nonsense seriously?

    Frighteningly, a little less than half of the country seems to.

    I often wonder if voters actually listen to what their favored politicians are saying, or if they just look for the R (or D) after the name and leave it at that.

  • I certainly am not going to vote for someone whom has no integrity, no trustworthiness.

    Fine, don’t vote for McCain then.

  • Bitter Kara wants to give her reprodutive rights to John McCain, John Hagee and Rush Limbaugh.

  • We should have a contest about “Kara”

    – what is “her” real name
    – where is “she” typing from
    – what rate of pay is the RNC paying “her”

    Noah, Fresno, $8.75/Hr

  • I am curious about how Obama means to create jobs that cannot be exported. Will they be jobs that are fundamentally not exportable, like doctors and nurses and teachers and construction workers, or will they be something that is fundamentally exportable like manufacturing or telephone customer service but prevented from being exported by legislation. If it’s the former, I’ll be even more impressed with Obama than I am already. If it’s the latter – meh – multinationals will find a way to export the jobs if they want to.

  • – what rate of pay is the RNC paying “her”

    I thought it was a nickel a comment.

  • Help me out, would you? I’m trying to remember who was president in 1986, when our last enormous jump in unemployment occurred. What party was he from?

  • Not long ago in this country, if a man who worked hard and honestly at his job, his middle-class family would thrive. Today, under the economic policies of George Bush and the Republicans, the policies John McCain wants to continue for another four years, both parents in a middle class family can work hard and honestly at their full time jobs and the family is still just one medical emergency or one layoff away from disaster.

    While the whole comment was outstanding, Steve T, this part was the one that hit home for me — because that’s exactly what has happened to my family.

    Won’t get into details, but you nailed exactly why our health care system needs to be totally revamped.

    @23:

    Gene
    Appalachia
    Minimum wage

    🙂

  • Sabre-toothed tigers, oh my! And I thought he began his career as a staffer for the Jackson campaign. As in Andrew.

    BTW:

    Harmony
    Virginia
    Tips & Expenses

  • “The American people cannot afford more inaction from Washington”.

    I seem to be missing part of the puzzle – didn’t he just say that government is the problem?

    When will people actually listen, and read, and think and write and sign petitions, but above all else understand what’s really going on here. Those uninformed have to realize that they are being played for saps – at least realize that.

  • Jeremiah
    Bob Jones University Press
    144 free Bibles to pass out to random strangers on the street

  • […] opening foreign markets to our goods. — McCain

    Theoretically, it sounds good. Our dollar is in the toilet, making things produced here cheap and attractive. But what are we going to sell hem? Sometimes, it seems to me that weapons and bullshit Wall Street paper is all we are producing.

    Chrenson, 233

    You’re at *Liberty*? Crazy Fallwell’s creation??? Get outa there before you get infected 🙂

  • Grumpy said:
    Soylent Oil is people! It’s people!

    🙂 Actually I wouldn’t be opposed to at least providing the option for people to donate their bodies to be used as fuel, food or whatever.

    PS (But not for Delay’s necrophilia.)

  • Remember when a family could get by on ONE income? ‘Course then came St. Ronnie —:-)

  • —On June 6th, 2008 at 11:45 am, OkieFromMuskogee said:
    Republican economics is a religion. It has its high priests, it’s Roman Curia (the Cato Institute), and its evangelists. Plenty of people take it seriously because it’s a matter of faith. Faith is the ability to believe what you know ain’t so. (Was that Mencken?)—

    Actually, that was Mark Twain.

    Don’t forget about the Sacred Text- the cocktail napkin Arthur Laffer gave to Jack Kemp.

  • Comments are closed.