Utah sends a message: We don’t like vouchers!

Guest Post by Morbo

Every now and then, folks in a red state do something surprising.

Consider Utah, for example. States don’t come much redder than Utah, where socially conservative Mormons account for 70 percent of the population. They vote reliably for the Republican Party. As the Carpetbagger noted recently, 71 percent of them went for George W. Bush in 2004.

Members of the Utah legislature undoubtedly felt safe, then, when they passed a private school voucher plan earlier this year. The plan, based on model legislation cooked up by a right-wing group called the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), is quite far-reaching. Basically, anyone with school-aged kids would qualify for a voucher. There is no income cap. You can be filthy rich and still get $500 to $3,000 annually for private school costs.

It’s an odd plan for Utah. The state is mostly rural and has very few private schools. In fact, 96 percent of Utahns send their children to public schools. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints does not run its own school system.

You may be thinking that’s because the church by default runs Utah’s public schools. But that’s not quite right. Many public schools in Utah allow something called “released time.” During the school day, children whose parents have given approval leave the building and receive religious instruction for an hour at a nearby Mormon facility. The arrangement is legal. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld it in a 1952 case called Zorach v. Clauson.

The fact is, many residents of Utah don’t care for vouchers.

Public education groups immediately began collecting signatures to put the new law on the ballot. In about a month, they collected 131,000 signatures. Only 92,000 signatures were needed, so it’s virtually a lock that this question will appear before the voters. (Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr., a supporter of vouchers, will decide when.)

Voucher boosters accused teachers’ unions of getting the signatures from their pals. That explanation doesn’t wash. The population of Utah is 2.2 million — but many of those are children because as a rule, Mormons like big families. And Utah is not exactly a union-friendly state. Clearly, backers of public education have tapped into a vein of discontent.

If history is any guide, vouchers will not fare well in the Beehive State. In 1988, backers of tuition tax credits, which are similar to vouchers, collected enough signatures to put that proposal on the ballot. Voters shot it down, 70 percent to 30 percent.

The situation in Utah is complex because two voucher bills were passed, and the referendum targets just one. Some court action looks inevitable, but if Utahns vote by a wide margin to dump vouchers, lawmakers would have to be nuts to try to force them through anyway.

Voucher boosters like to claim that the people support extending tax aid to religious schools. They cooked up a few polls with slanted questions to back that up. But when people are given a chance to vote directly on vouchers, they always reject them. Americans want a functioning public school system, not a network of tax-subsidized religious schools that have the right to teach creationism, homophobia, male supremacy and other right-wing ideas, and that can fire teachers because they are gay, are the “wrong” religion or simply because the principal does not like their lifestyle choices.

With lots of hard work and some luck, vouchers will go down to defeat again, and Utah — that arid, bright red nest of right-wing Mormons — will lead the way in defending public education.

Vouchers in a Mormon state won’t be acceptable to the majority population because no-limits vouchers will be the “Pandora’s Box” that allows a flood of anti-Morom evangelicals to pour in and set up shop….

  • Let me get this straight. Some guy claimed an angel gave him golden tablets and we’ve never seen them since and they built a society on that idea, yet they have opinions about education?

  • The two key facts – that most Utahans are Mormons, and that there are few private schools already – explains why they don’t support vouchers.

    The voucher project has two critical components. Religious activists view it is a way to get kids into religious schools for indoctrination. If they’re already religious, there’s no gain. The idea is to bribe working class parents by offering them the promise of a better education for their kids, in exchange for indoctrinating them in catholicism or evangelical protestantism.

    This doesn’t work in Utah. The main local relitious leaders, the LDS elders, don’t see a need for it because most of the population is already Mormon and their kids don’t seem to stray much (I’m guessing). Parents don’t see much benefit because they aren’t in the same situation as those in most large urban school districts, where they’d jump at a chance to take their kids out of the decrepit, underfunded public schools and put them in private ones, of whatever faith.

  • Mormons tithe to their church. Many of them are serious about the education of their children. Unless they’re very wealthy, they can’t afford additional tuition. Why would they support sucking money out of the public school system to support private schools that they don’t need and probably can’t afford.

  • What you said, Dale (#2). Another book of god to join the Bible and the Koran. I’ve always thought that Mormon had one too many m’s in it. The angel, by the way, was called Moroni, if I remember my mythology aright. One would think that a con man like Joe Smith would’ve come up with something a little less liable to be mocked, wouldn’t you?

    So that must mean it’s true! My bad…

  • In fact, the voucher bills passed by the slimmest majority this year in the legislature — one vote. It has failed repeatedly in years past so even our conservative representatives know how the public feels about vouchers. But they are arrogant and responsive to extreme righ wing elements.

    Utah has the lowest per-pupil expendatures in the nation (due to high numbers of kids per tax payer). People here understand that vouchers will further drain the system. They (we) want decent allocations to our public system — not “school choice.”

  • Comments are closed.