Vitter’s creationist pork

Sen. David Vitter’s (R-La.) extra-curricular activities recently got him into a little trouble — he’s conceded making use of a prostitution service — but he apparently has a plan to keep himself in the religious right’s good graces. Vitter has decided to throw some pork-barrel spending at a bizarre Louisiana creationist group.

Sen. David Vitter, R-La., earmarked $100,000 in a spending bill for a Louisiana Christian group that has challenged the teaching of Darwinian evolution in the public school system and to which he has political ties.

The money is included in the labor, health and education financing bill for fiscal 2008 and specifies payment to the Louisiana Family Forum “to develop a plan to promote better science education.”

The group in question is the Louisiana Family Forum, which has a stated mission of trying to “persuasively present biblical principles in the centers of influence on issues affecting the family through research, communication and networking.” The group’s materials have also said it has a “battle plan to combat evolution,” which called modern biology a “dangerous” concept that “has no place in the classroom.”

It sounds kind of ridiculous — in large part because it is ridiculous — but Vitter has basically earmarked a very generous donation to a right-wing group to promote creationism with our money.

[Vitter] said the education earmark was meant to offer a broad array of views in the public schools.

“This program helps supplement and support educators and school systems that would like to offer all of the explanations in the study of controversial science topics such as global warming and the life sciences,” Vitter said in a written statement.

The money in the earmark will pay for a report suggesting “improvements” in science education in Louisiana, the development and distribution of educational materials and an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Ouachita Parish School Board’s 2006 policy that opened the door to biblically inspired teachings in science classes.

Allow me to translate. Vitter wants to give a creationist group $100,000 in federal money to encourage Louisiana officials to embrace creationism in public schools, the law notwithstanding.

Even by the standards of congressional Republicans, this is pretty breathtaking. It’s one thing for Vitter to endorse pseudo-science; it’s something else when he decides to subsidize it with federal tax dollars.

If the Louisiana Family Forum wants to encourage schools to teach nonsense, it can. If it wants to tell supporters that modern biology underpinned the atrocities committed by Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, and Pol Pot, there’s nothing stopping it.

But Vitter’s earmark for these clowns is crazy. The group didn’t even ask for the money — a Louisiana Family Forum official described the taxpayer-financed gift as “a bit of a surprise.”

The earmark hasn’t passed yet; it’s included in a spending bill that’s awaiting approval.

I’ll keep you posted.

first he has screwing prostitutes, now it’s our turn

  • But, I just heard Bush at this morning’s presser decry all of the pork that the Democrats are infusing into the next appropriations bill. If only those darn Dems cared about fiscal responsibility…

  • This needs to be challenged under the seperation of church and state rules! Federal courts have already ruled against creationism in schools as being a purely religious doctrine.

  • yeah, and wasn’t mittens complaining about the republicans acting like earmark democrats? its all just a bunch of horses**t

  • There’s a good anti-Republican slogan in this story, somewhere, I’m sure.

    “Republicans: Spending YOUR tax dollars to support SOMEONE ELSE’S religion to cover up THEIR sexual perversions.”

  • “Vitter has basically earmarked a very generous donation to a right-wing group to promote creationism with our money.”

    F**ker! This isn’t an earmark, it’s a bribe pure and simple. This is the state of Republicanism in this day and age. This is what these guys do.

  • It would be less offensive to me if Vitter spent the money on hookers instead.

    What are these creayshunists going to do? Play episodes of the Flintstones in an endless loop (as the Flintstones are the closest thing in pop culture to their fantasy land hoodoo of creayshun)?

  • I agree with Dan. I would rather spend $100,000 of tax payer money on some hookers than a bunch of bible thumping, hellfire and brimstoning neanderthals.

  • Maybe we should earmark $200,000 to teach kiddies in Louisiana why their Republican senator likes wearing diapers at brothels, and what a brothel is and how it fits with the theory and practice of Republican family values. Teach the controversy!!!

  • Seems like a ploy to me.

    How to recover from a indiscretion with a prostitute, by David Vitter.

    1. Introduce legislation to heap money on a bunch of ignorant flat earthers.
    2. Piss and moan when Democrats block obviously unconstitutional asshatery.
    3. Reap brownie points for both.
    4. Fuck ugly whores.

  • A ridiculous and probably unconstitutional use of our public money.
    What struck me is the name of the recipient group (Louisiana Family Forum), which sent me off on a tangent… which I freely admit is a tangent: the word “Family”.
    It seems to me that the conservative movement, and the religious right have a view of the concept of “family” that is both very narrow and erroneous. And they have seized the word “family” as if it something that they own … that they alone are the “keepers of”. They present themselves as the sole guardians of “Family” in our country, so that they can promote their narrow minded values as if they are critical to the survival of the concept of “family”. Who can be against “family”?
    But these are people who quake and tremble inside at the real-world challenges of maintaining a sense of family, and thus turn to authoritarianism, and fundamentalist Christianity in a desperate attempt to deal with the ambiguity and messiness of the real world of individual human beings. They can’t imagine there being any order in family life without authoritarianism and fundamentalist Christianity.
    Those of us who have established families with strong family feelings, but without buying in to any authoritarian or fundie world views, are NOT, in THEIR opinion true families. Who are they to say we are not? In fact we are true families, and in fact they are wrong about what makes a family.
    They just use the word to cover up their narrow-minded bigotries. We should take the word back from them, and I mean in the political arena. They use the word to get votes from people who don’t pay much attention to real issues but can respond viscerally to statements like “my opponent is anti-family’. Democratic candidates should use the word “family” a lot and provide anecdotal examples that clarify what that word means to progressives.

  • Creationism isn’t science and evolution is no more a theory than gravity. Next Vitter will want to earmark appropriations to study speaking to ghosts of Louisianna. This guy is such a hypocrite and a phoney and is trying to buy votes with our tax money. Perfect behavior from someone who’s morals are up for sale.
    How much more ridiculous are these pathetic senators allowed to be before they are laughed out of the senate?

  • I am so starting a religious cult and 527 group. I want those federal tax dollars and I want to be tax free, too!

  • The group’s materials have also said it has a “battle plan to combat evolution,”

    Heck, they’ve already implemented that plan and have *won*: afteral, they managed to *devolve*…

  • He just wants to lay the goundwork that on the 8th day God created escorts…once that is in place he can retract his guilty plea and restore his good name. Deutsch has already discounted the big bang theory and was paid by our government to do so. There really is no difference. How about we add … on the 9th day America was destroyed.

  • Comments are closed.