Voting to end the minimum wage as we know it

We already know that Senate Republicans launched a filibuster rather than let the Senate approve the first increase to the minimum wage in 12 years. What went largely unnoticed, however, was an amendment from Sen. Wayne Allard (R-Colo.) that would have undermined the very idea of a federal minimum wage.

The AFL-CIO’s blog had a disconcerting post on the subject.

Yesterday, 69 years after the minimum wage was first established, 28 U.S. senators did just that when they voted “yes” on an amendment from Colorado Republican Wayne Allard that would have scrapped the federal minimum wage. (Click here to see the 28 senators who voted for the Allard amendment. They should be ashamed of themselves and if they are your lawmakers, let them know how wrong they were.)

We’re not making this up. Here’s what Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) had to say about the Allard amendment that was offered to the Senate bill (S. 2) to raise the federal minimum wage from $5.15 an hour to $7.25 an hour:

“On the Allard amendment, members should understand what the effect of the Allard amendment is, and that is effectively to repeal the minimum wage for any states among the 50 states. That effectively is what the Allard amendment does.”

Initially, I assumed this was wrong. Sure, there’s some hostility for the minimum wage among congressional Republicans, but there couldn’t possibly be 28 GOP senators who’d give up on the policy altogether.

But the description is largely on the mark. The Allard amendment would have basically left it to the states to set their own wage limits — there’d be no national minimum at all.

Now, the reality is that Allard almost certainly knew that this measure wouldn’t pass, but offered it to make a point — he believes in “state flexibility” on the minimum wage, so he wanted a vote on his preferred method. Besides, he’s retiring from Congress in two years and doesn’t have to worry about political consequences.

But it wasn’t just Allard; 28 Republicans voted for this thing, including a presidential candidate you may have heard of.

The full list is here, and it’s worth taking a look at. Not surprisingly, you find all of the chamber’s most conservative members, including Bunning (Ky.), Coburn (Okla.), Hatch (Utah), and Inhofe (Okla.).

But you also find John McCain voting for this, and rumor has it, he’s running for president.

Now, like everyone else, McCain surely knew that Allard’s measure wouldn’t pass, so by voting for it, he indicated that he really believes in it. This wasn’t party pressure or loyalty to the president; he voted this way all on his own.

Is it me, or is this an unusually risky political move for the leading GOP presidential candidate? The vote on the amendment didn’t much of anything in the way of media coverage, but in a single day, McCain voted against the first increase in the minimum wage in 12 years and for effectively repealing the federal minimum wage altogether. All of this, despite four out of five Americans taking the opposite position.

Sounds to me like a possible campaign issue.

When you hear the word “flexibility”from a Republican, it means to “bend over and take it.”

  • Kennedy on the floor today: “The concept of the minimum wage was that it was going to be a minimum payment, a minimum standard. What was accepted at the time of the minimum wage is that in this country, we didn’t want to accelerate a rush to the bottom so that we would have competition in the various states to pay the lowest possible wages–sweat labor–in order to try to attract industries into those particular States, but to provide a minimum standard.”

    McCain & co. want America to compete with Indonesia for the title of “country with most sweatshops”. A brilliant solution to all immigration and trade issues. What a maverick!

  • I have a very simple idea. How about we index the minimum wage to Congress’ salary? That way, Conservative f*&ks can cut the minimum wage all that they like! (somehow, I don’t think the minimum wage would EVER lose ground against inflation again…)

  • Let’s all make a note on our next year’s calendar to make McCain’s vote on this min-wage bill into an issue in 08. On our own blogs and in comments every where.

  • Wait a second, wait just a second! Which Senator John McCain of Arizona are we talking about? There seem to have been so many of them in recent years that I can’t tell them apart.

    Some of the Senator McCains have been taking positions on the far right. Some on the center. Others on the left, center left, center right, far right of left, far left of extreme right, a tetch center of far right….and so on.

    Somebody please, please check out the Senator from Arizona for schizophrenia.

    Right now he kind of reminds me of the hooker who asked, “Which way do you want it, honey?”

    Hey, if you hang around McCain, maybe you’d better wear a condom.

  • Oh good, we have a racist on board. Thanks Idiocracy for the stupidest comment of the year.

    As for McCain, I can’t wait to see those commercials on flip-flopping, voting against the minimum wage and Iraq. He’s finished; his high ratings only exist because the American people don’t know his record. But wait until Romney or Huckabee swift boat him; McCain’s poll ratings will sink like the Titanic.

  • Dr. Dobson’s public rejection makes me think that McCain has decided he can’t get the social conservatives. Therefore, his only path to the Republican nomination is by casting his whole lot with the CoC guys. If he can get Norquist and CfG on his side, he still has a shot, but they have to have a reason to pick him over the other guys.

    A charismatic candidate can probably get through the Republican primary with full-throated support by one of the two major constituencies if the other group is divided. McCain is gambling on a Brownback – Huckabee – Romney fight for the Jesus Camp brigade. If he puts all his effort into the money people, he has a chance. I’m not convinced he’s right, but that’s his bet. He has an ethanol problem in Iowa, and social conservatives dominate South Carolina. If he doesn’t win New Hampshire, he’s toast. New Hampshire Republicans are diehard libertarians except they kind of like the environment, so they sound like his perfect constiuency. But they’re in Romney’s back yard, so if he doesn’t give them every reason to vote for him, he’s toast.

    That’s my guess, anyway.

  • Please note that Chuck “I hate the war in Iraq” Hagel also voted yea.

    So much for trading him for Lieberman.

  • “Philosophers are intellectuals and intellectuals are people who play with words and ideas. This does not mean they are intelligent for my experience has been that in the battles of life, you should flee the intellectual as you would a small pox epidemic, for they are 100% useless, nay, a 100% burden.”

    Yo Jackass, you big “nigra” speech isn’t a “play with words and ideas”?? Some people are too stupid to realize just how stupid they really are.

  • Idiocracy- not only racist, but entirely wrong. Ford happens to be posting a ‘record loss’ because they just refinanced in the 4th Quarter of ’06, taking out $23 Billion in loans to cover the streamlining of operations, including idling 16 plants, severances for 14,000 salaried workers, and buyout packages for approximately 30-40,000 hourly workers. By front-loading the costs, Ford is actually positioning itself to improve its finances under the Way Forward plan much more rapidly than initially propositioned.

    In 2005, Ford only operated at 79% of manufacturing capacity. That’s a lot of wasted dollars. The streamlining, although it incurs massive immediate costs, seeks to eliminate the excess capacity in the short term (the cuts in salaried employees, for example, are expected to be completed by the end of the 1st Quarter ’07). So, basically, the interest on the loans is cheaper for Ford than maintaining unused capacity in employees and plants.

    So, Idiocracy, please do us two favors. First, learn the actual facts before you render a decision. Second, please go to Detroit and make your comments (after which I don’t expect we- or anyone- will hear from you again!). Thank you, and have a nice day!

  • Even Sessions and Shelby of Alabama voted nay! Hard to believe Hagel and McCain voted for this loser amendment.

  • McCain doomed his run for prez with that vote. I’m not sure he is much brighter than Bush.

  • State Flexibility.–Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, an employer shall not be required to pay an employee a wage that is greater than the minimum wage provided for by the law of the State in which the employee is employed and not less than the minimum wage in effect in that State on January 1, 2007.

    Not exactly “race to the bottom”, but merely a stagnation.

  • This is the way to solve our immigration problems. If American jobs are paying a dollar an hour, the Mexicans will stay home. 🙂

  • Let a thousand poison pills bloom….

    From the SF Bay Area Indy Media:
    “Two of the amendments [to the minimum wage bill] just filed directly discriminate against farm workers. Sen. Chambliss’ (R-GA) newly introduced amendments will affect all farm workers by turning back the clock to the pre-1966 days when migrant farm workers were excluded from minimum wage protections. The effect of Senator Chambliss’ amendments is to lower the wage rates paid to foreign workers who come to this country to work in agriculture through the H2A program. This will of course have the corresponding effect of driving down wages for all farm workers–domestic, in addition to foreign. Moreover, this change would simply encourage the increasing use of foreign guest workers in potentially exploitive conditions.”

  • both my senators (NH) voted yea … grr. It will be a pleasure to contribute to a Dem challenger in 2008.

  • re: #16….

    That is the actual text of the amendment. That minimum wages cannot be lower than they are today.
    So, this whole hand-wringing about $1/hour wages is bunk.

  • I’m one of Allards constituents. The Allard bill is shocking yet not surprising. The man is slavish in his support for anything George W/Cheney/Rove advocate. Now that he’s not running for another term, look for more outrageous behavior on his part. Personally, I doubt he has the imagination to come up with this stuff on his own. As for McCain, his voting record (and any other Senator running for office in 2008) will be put under the microscope over the next two years, and that will hurt him. This will not help.

  • So much for bi-partisanship, Pelosi’s hundred hour pledge gave a minimum wage increase of a lousy 2.15 over TWO years, and yet these greedy sob’s want more and more. Then when I read that 28 senators voted on a bill they presented to get rid of the Minimum Wage entirely, and that the media had not even reported this disgusting greedy bill and it’s votes, I hit the ceiling. I had to do a cartoon on this topic since people will read a cartoon before they read an article.
    see the cartoon, “Minimal progress with minimum wage” at my website;
    http://www.whatnowtoons.com

  • This sounds like a herd of liberals and conservative haters.
    The minimum wage hurts the very people it is aimed at helping. When an employer adds 10% to his labor cost, they will increase the price of their products more than 10%. So he is a person earning $100 per week. He can but a product for $100. Afetr he gets a reaise to $120 the same product now costs $125 and he can no longer afford to get want he wants.
    You could also add price freezes on products. That will cause some businesses to go under. Now instead of getting $100 they get $0. Laid off.
    Now they are on welfare. This will make my taxes higher. So the ones who were lucky to keep their jobs at the higher pay will pay more for products pay more in taxes to support the ones now on welfare. Have you ever heard of free enterprise or free markets??

  • WHOEVER THINKS THAT FOR ONE SECOND RAISING MIN WAGE IS A GOOD THING PLEASE EMAIL ME AT DPDOUGHJAY@AOL.COM. I ALREADY HAD ONE BUSINESS GO UNDER WITH 30 WORKERS AND I DO NOT NEED ANY OTHER ONE . IF ANYTHING PLEASE LOWER IT BACK TO 5.15 AN HOUR. I WILL CHANGE YOUR MIND AND TALK SOME SENSE INOT YOU. I DO NOT CARE IF YOU ARE THE PRESIDENT, V.P. OR JUST A PERSON READING THIS …..PLEASE EMAIL ME

  • Comments are closed.