‘We are approaching a level of ridiculousness’

I’ve watched with some amazement the radicalization of the modern Republican Party that started in earnest with Gingrich, continued through DeLay, was made more severe by Cheney, and continues on today through some odd sense of ideological inertia.

The consequences of this radicalization for the political landscape have been sweeping (and devastating), but it’s also led to a Republican Party that seems to be collapsing before our very eyes. Sheryl Gay Stolberg notes that Sen. Larry Craig’s (R-Idaho) sex scandal has left much of the party wondering whether things can get any worse.

Forget Mark Foley of Florida, who quit the House last year after exchanging sexually explicit e-mail messages with under-age male pages, or Jack Abramoff, the lobbyist whose dealings with the old Republican Congress landed him in prison. They are old news, replaced by a fresh crop of scandal-plagued Republicans, men like Senator David Vitter of Louisiana, whose phone number turned up on the list of the so-called D.C. Madam, or Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska and Representative Rick Renzi of Arizona, both caught up in F.B.I. corruption investigations.

It is enough to make a self-respecting Republican want to tear his hair out in frustration, especially as the party is trying to defend an unpopular war, contain the power of the new Democratic majority on Capitol Hill and generate some enthusiasm among voters heading toward the presidential election in 2008.

“The real question for Republicans in Washington is how low can you go, because we are approaching a level of ridiculousness,” said [Republican strategist Scott Reed], sounding exasperated in an interview on Tuesday morning. “You can’t make this stuff up. And the impact this is having on the grass-roots around the country is devastating. Republicans think the governing class in Washington are a bunch of buffoons who have total disregard for the principles of the party, the law of the land and the future of the country.”

As it turns out, they’d be right. Indeed, I sincerely hope that’s exactly what rank-and-file Republicans believe about their party’s officials in DC, because it would show that reality is, slowly but surely, reaching people and having an effect.

For that matter, Stolberg noted that it’s not just DC.

Just ask Thomas Ravenel, the state treasurer of South Carolina, who had to step down as state chairman of Rudolph W. Giuliani’s presidential campaign after he was indicted on cocaine charges in June.

Or Bob Allen, a state representative in Florida who was jettisoned from the John McCain campaign last month after he was arrested on charges of soliciting sex in a public restroom.

While blogging every day, I often wonder how, exactly, someone looks at the Republican Party of 2007 — its leaders, its decisions, its priorities, its conduct — and says, “You know, that’s the party for me.”

The irony is, this was supposed to be a year of recovery for the GOP. Last year was a humiliating fiasco, with Abramoff, Cunningham, Ney, Foley, Harris, DeLay, Wedlon, and Burns (among others). The voters awarded Dems both chambers, Republicans learned a valuable lesson, and 2007 would help the GOP take a long look in the mirror and get back on track.

But as Paul Kiel explained, this year is poised to be as shameful as last year.

So what’s the tally this year so far? Well, there is, of course, 1) Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID) and 2) Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) with their sex scandals (the attempted restroom tryst and numerous successful hotel room trysts, respectively).

But then there’s the much greater toll of just plain ol’ corruption. 3) Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK) and 4) Rep. Don Young (R-AK) are under investigation for their ties to the oil company Veco (though that’s just the tip of the iceberg for Young). 5) Reps. Tom Feeney (R-FL) and 6) John Doolittle (R-CA) have found themselves the focus of a reinvigorated Abramoff investigation (though Abramoff is in prison, he’s still busily cooperating). 7) Rep. Rick Renzi (R-AZ) had his house raided. 8) The FBI is investigating Rep. Gary Miller’s (R-CA) land deals.

And then there’s 9) Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) whose land deal with a businessman and campaign contributor became such a scandal that she finally just sold back the plot of land.

There are a couple holdovers from 2006, of course; scandal figures who’ve stuck around and managed to keep a relatively low profile. 10) Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-CA) is still apparently under federal investigation. And 11) Rep. Ken Calvert’s (R-CA) land deals are still winning scrutiny.

Ouch. We’re looking at a Republican Party that is quickly becoming a laughingstock. It’s a sight to behold.

HA!

  • You hit the nail on the head – how does someone look at the Repulbicans and say “yep, I want a slice of that, that’s me all over that is.” I imagine there’s some massive cognitive dissonance going on, coupled with a “I-hates-liberals-so-I-must-loves-Republicans” mindset.

    The sad part is the Democrats are not yet taking advantage of this. The netroots is, fortunately.

  • The GOP is acting like Romans: an entitled nobility manipulating public sentiments and morality for personal enrichment between orgies.

    Flog the slaves who talked!

  • And yet, Congressional Democrats still haven’t figured out that it’s safe to oppose Bush/Cheney/etc.

  • So the Rethuglicans are out of touch with their base. So are the Democrats similarly out of touch. The rank-and-file are way ahead of the politicians as usual. Just exactly what is supposed to happen now? The Democrats can’t unite themselves into a coherent force, and the Rethugs keep getting punched with their massive hypocrisy and endless greed.

    Do we still have a functioning political system in this country? Or are we really ripe for authoritarian rule?

  • I think Craig’s hanging out in the men’s restroom at the MSP airport — nobody has to go to restrooms for sex anymore — is part and parcel of the GOP’s effort to capture the nostalgia for bygone days, i.e., the glorious ’50s. I wonder if the 2008 GOP convention in Minneapolis will declare “the stall” a national shrine.

  • I waiting for the wingnut blogosphere to link to this post and cry foul that you put a ‘smiley face’ after the bit about Renzi, even though a ‘8)’ was supposed to be #8. That’s the level they’d stoop to (and have).

  • While blogging every day, I often wonder how, exactly, someone looks at the Republican Party of 2007 — its leaders, its decisions, its priorities, its conduct — and says, “You know, that’s the party for me.”

    I feel the same way. I am disgusted with the NeoCon Party and it’s Dear Leader. But I am compelled to support a candidate that will unequivocally withdraw from the U.S. Military Occupation of Iraq, end American Imperialism, and take a stand for the Constitution and against the Plenipotentiary Executive. That candidate is Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX).

    Ask yourselves, who do the NeoCons hate more? Liberals or Ron Paul supporters?

  • The Party of Personal Responsibility, Family Values and Common Sense Foreign Policy?

    Apologies to Lou Reed (Walk on the Right Side)
    Foley came from miami f.l.a.
    Rode the Newt Wave across the u.s.a.

    Hit on pages along the way
    Busted with IMs and then gone to Rehab
    He says, hey folks, talk the walk on the “Right” side
    Said, hey people, take a walk on the “Right” side

    Larry was elected from Idaho
    In the bathroom he was everybodys darling

    But he was looking for head
    For which he was busted then
    He says, hey folks, take a walk on the “Right” side
    Said, hey people, take a walk on the “Right” side
    And the vice cops go

    Doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo X12

    Ted S. never once gave it away
    Everybody had to pay and pay

    An earmark here and an earmark there
    Ole DC is the place where they said
    Hey folks, take a walk on the “Right” side
    I said hey Ted, take a walk on the “Right” side

    Pious David Vitter came and hit the streets
    Lookin for hot ho’s and diapers to wear

    Went to Jean Palfrey
    You should have seen him pay pay pay
    They said, hey folks, take a walk on the “Right”side
    They said, hey babe, get some action on the “Right” side
    All right, huh

    Rove is just getting away
    Thought he was James Bond for a day

    Then I guess he had to go
    Who knew naming spies was a big no-no
    He said, hey USA, take a walk on the “Right” side
    I said, hey people, take a walk on the “Right” side
    And Pat Fitzpatrick had to say

    Doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo X12

  • We need to remember that most people haven’t been paying close attention to the sheer magnitude of the corruption exhibited by the Republicans, and many Republicans are unaware of a lot of it because Fox & Co don’t talk about it. Listing the perps early and often is a really good idea, and of course reminding them of the sheer hypocrisy of the sexual scandals is great for damping down their enthusiasm for all Republicans.

    Start every conversation with “And of course these guys (the Republicans) are the people who told us they knew that Iraq would be a cakewalk…”

    Dragonscholar is right about one thing, the Republicans run on pure hatred. No matter what their party does, as long as they give Dems a fight there will be Republicans willing to vote for them. Our job is to peel off the ones whose brains are actually connected up to anything.

  • Gives new life to that old truism: “Absolute power corrupts absolutely”.
    I don’t know what else they expected.

  • The GOP is rotten to the core, and has no idea how to turn things around. Even with oblivion looking them in the face, they can’t figure out how to change course, or in what direction to change it. Nor will the upcoming generation of young republicans be much help – they’ve been raised to be higher-voiced versions of their predecessors (see Kyle Sampson and Bradley Schlozman as examples). They are well and truly stuck.

  • JKap says:

    I feel the same way. I am disgusted with the NeoCon Party and it’s Dear Leader. But I am compelled to support a candidate that will unequivocally withdraw from the U.S. Military Occupation of Iraq, end American Imperialism, and take a stand for the Constitution and against the Plenipotentiary Executive. That candidate is Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX).

    Ah yes, back to the Gold Standard, get the US out of the UN, and every other far right myth of 50 years ago. That’s sure the way to go for a progressive.

    Libertarianism works in a society of 100 like-minded idiots, until one of them realizes how easy it is to stop the civility and take the other 99 to the cleaners before they know what hit them.

    Thanks, JKap, for reminding me of what kind of voter put Bush in office in 2000 (and no, it wasn’t the Republicans).

  • When Republican strategist Scott Reed says, “How low can you go … ou can’t make this stuff up,” I think of all the times I have read progressive bloggers and commenters make the same remarks as we have watched the Permanent Republican Majority® unfold before our eyes these past years. It looks like maybe some of the effects of the kool-aid are beginning to wear off. Welocome to the reality based community Mr. Reed.

  • Other than the very wealthy and certain corporate officers, all of whom have done very well financially under this Sadministration (and who could leave the country, very wealthy and comfortable and with lots of investments elsewhere, in a NY second), I do not know who would look upon the GOP favorably. Racists and bigots, possibly, but one would think that at some point in time personal interests would overcome such things.

  • “You can’t make this stuff up.”

    Translation: You can’t spin this.

    No wonder you hear various slobbering idiots on the fRight hoping for another Sept. 11th. That’s about what it would take to distract people from their non-stop parade of perverts and crooks.

    Popcorn?

  • At least gay Republicans don’t have to worry about being blackmailed politically. What could they possibly do worse for the country than what they already do.?

  • Sure, the republicans are imploding. After all, when your whole platform is based on the notion that government is the problem, I hardly think you’d be qualified to actually BE in government.

    At any rate, I do fear that the castrated DC Dems, Reid and Pelosi primarily, don’t have the instinct to go for the kill. I for the life of me can’t understand how Bu$hCO still, after everything that has happened, acts with impunity; even now using the same bogus excuses for war with Iran that they did with Iraq. It’s as if they are the little children mis-behaving because they know their parents are too soft to do anything about it.

    I say, if Pelosi and Reid don’t have the backbone to hold these Republicans to the fire, to start impeachment, to start taking back our freedoms, then we need to remove them and put someone who has the killer instinct in their place.

    Yes, I said it. Pelosi and Reid need to bow to the will of the people, or get out of the way. Is there some sort of procedure in place where they can be recalled or removed from their positions?

  • Republicans think the governing class in Washington are a bunch of buffoons who have total disregard for the principles of the party, the law of the land and the future of the country.”

    I like how the dude trys to pin the mess on “the governing class in Washington” even though he’s moaning about the Republicans.

    Won’t work, douchebag. That mess is all yours.

    But when you correct that “mistake”, you get this:

    The Republicans are a bunch of buffoons who have total disregard for the law of the land and the future of the country.

    Sounds like what the progressive bloggers have been saying for a LONG time. Can the Democrats now take this to heart and act accordingly?

    PLEASE?

  • The real scandal isn’t the sexcapades of Vitter, Craig, et al. The real scandal is what this gang of crooks and sociopaths have done with the power bequeathed to them by the voters.

    Katrina, Iraq, record high number and percentage of those without health insurance, the repeal of Constitutionally guaranteed rights, a widening gap between rich and poor, a government by, for, and of corporate fascists and self-dealers. These are the fruits of Republican governance.

    It would be nice if their party reformed itself to the point that they could at least be a responsible opposition, checking the excesses of the Democrats. But to do that, they’d have to stand for something–and at the moment, all they stand for is self-indulgence and self-enrichment.

  • I think it’s instructive to note that the most savage and desperate attacks on Craig are coming from his erstwhile GOP pals. I was around when LBJ aide Walter Jenkins was nabbed in flagrante delicto at the DC YMCA. He had to leave Washington (it was 1964), but my recollection is that the dominant response among Democrats was resignation and sadness rather than revulsion. In those days there were even a number of Republicans who were able to restrain themselves from applauding.

  • At some point, voters who identify as Republicans for the right reasons (and there are some, even if they are way down on the list of reasons the “modern” Republican seems to offer) are going to have to take control and push out the politicians who are making it difficult to have any pride at all in that identification. These are the voters who would never be able to vote for a Democrat, so that is not an option for them; if they can’t vote for a GOP candidate they can be proud of, chances are, they won’t vote at all. GOP fundraising is, I think, a harbinger of that very phenomenon.

    What’s getting in the way of that? Same thing that gets in the way of Democrats trying to field candidates with traditional liberal positions: the corporate lobby and all their money, and a system that isdesigned to protect the incumbent from challenge. If there is no threat to the security of one’s office, where is the impetus for change? What’s the point in being responsive to your individual constituents if it has no impact on whether you keep your seat?

    I know a few “traditional” Republicans who are just demoralized at what is happening within their party, who have very little to champion these days. Bush? Nope. Cheney? Nope. Gonzales? The Republicans I know who are lawyers are sick about what he has done to the DOJ and how he has perverted justice. The long list of those in prison, under indictment, under investigation, sleeping around, being arrested in bathrooms? They feel the need to distance themselves, and to make it clear they don’t approve, but lately, it’s getting harder and harder to explain why they identify as Republicans. “Because I’m not a Democrat” is about all they have right now – and that’s not a lot.

  • “we are approaching a level of ridiculousness” — Republican strategist Scott Reed

    No, Mr. Reed, the level of your ridiculousness is just beginning to become apparent. You built a coalition under false pretenses and rode it into power under false pretenses. Thanks to the constant drone of your propaganda machine, you kept your ridiculousness under wraps for a long time, but it was always there. It’s embedded in the fabric of your ideology.

  • The term “self-respecting Republican” is an oxymoron since every last one of them has voted in lockstep with the Bush administration from the first, except for a very few votes by a tiny minority.

    No one with any real self-respect would allow themselves to be used so shamelessly for so long unless they were total morons, too.

    Which, I grant you, is pretty much a given these days, as well.

  • It seems the modern Republican party is more like a bunch of arsonists who are yelling fire to draw attention away from their burning sensations, or a robber who yells “he went that way” to draw attention away from his newly acquired bounty. It seems to be a party of miscreants and perverts drawing attention away from itself by pointing to the other miscreants and perverts among us.

    Whether it’s Craig or Vitter, Hubbard or Stewart, no one wants moral hypocracy hoisted upon them by the likes of these ne’erdowells, and so with that, I say that ’08 will be the year the modern Republican party meets its demise the way the Federalists met theirs in the summer of 1814. -Kevo

  • Ron Paul sucks. He only has one issue he’s right on and that’s the occupation. All other issues he fails miserably. No one is afraid of Ron Paul because he is just inconsequential, a one issue candidate.
    The republican party has no control over its leasdership which has gone off the deep end. The WH is set to attack Iran. Bush has already declared war on Iran in his VA speech. CIA claims there’s no stopping it now. The attack will happen in Sept. So how will this affect the republican party? Does the leadership really care? Bush is obsessed with Iraq and Cheney is obsessed with Iran and both feel that attacking Iran will unite the party against the real enemy…the Democrats.

    John Kennedy suddenly said, “This is the party for me” when he recently switched to the republican party. He feels he can advance “personally” in power and money by switching. These are the qualities of selfishness and personal interest that attract people to the republican party. Keep in mind what the republican priority really is. Greed, profit, and making sure the government only works for them, providing them with security, funding for privatization, and laws to advance this agenda.
    It’s leaders would even screw over it’s members for personal gain. Attacking Iran is just such an example. It benefits no one except Bush’s ego. The loss of human life has little meaning to a WH so quick to jump to military actions rather than use whatever means possible to prevent using military action. Iran is a country of “people” and this administration cannot see that. Would such action benefit the republican party? Does Bush really care? What do you think?

    Everyday I live in fear of my president…of what he might do next. Don’t you? If so, is this still our America?

  • Ron Paul !?!?!?

    Loud sound of jaw dropping on floor accompanied by loud slapping of own forehead.

    You’re kidding me, right?

    What Tom Cleaver (post #16) said

  • I’m no fan of the Bush Administration. It’s the reason that I count myself a former Republican, and I’m hopeful that the party is, indeed, imploding, because it deserves it.

    However, let’s not pretend that the rot is only on the right side of the aisle. I can cite recent examples (William Jefferson of Louisiana) and ancient ones (the sad fact that Ted Kennedy remains in office despite what should have been vehicular homicide) of problems with Democrats.

    Like I said, the Republicans deserve to fail spectacularly. But the Democratic Party isn’t going to make things any better. I tend to agree with “Rich” above, who questioned whether we still have a functioning political system in this country.

  • Another Filthy Republicunt Uncovered

    Submissives by day, dick-suckers by night. Thanks for helping the cause, Larry Craig. You are just what we mean when we say that conservatives are fake opposition.

  • Re: bjobotts @ #30
    No one is afraid of Ron Paul because he is just inconsequential…

    Of course that is what the Corporate Military Industrial Media wants you to believe (of which is the same knock used against Dennis Kucinich’s candidacy).

    Excuse me, but the following straw poll results are not inconsequential.

    Straw Poll Results, Ron Paul

    Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, 8/26/2007, ____1st (45.2 %)
    DeKalb County, Georgia Straw Poll, 8/25/2007, __1st 24 %)
    HRCC (Minnesota), 8/22/2007, ________________3rd (16.0%)
    Ronald Reagan Club (Washington), 8/21/2007, ___1st (28.0%)
    West Alabama, 8/18/2007, ___________________1st (81.2%)
    Strafford County, NH, 8/18/2007,_______________1st (72.2%)
    West Lafayette, Indiana, 8/18/2007, ____________4th (11.7%)
    Illinois State Fair, 8/17/2007, __________________3rd (18.9%)
    Students for Life of America, 8/16/2007, _________4th (9.0%)
    Western Montana Fair, 8/15/2007, _____________6th (4.0%)
    Gaston County, NC, 8/14/2007, ________________1st (36.6%)
    Ames, Iowa, 8/11/2007, ______________________5th (9.1%)
    NFRA, St. Louis, MO, 8/6/2007, _______________3rd (14.0%)
    FreedomWorks Straw Poll, 8/3/2007, ___________1st (56 %)
    Georgetown County, SC, 7/28/2007, ____________2nd (17.9%)
    New Hampshire Taxpayers, 7/7/2007, ___________1st (65.3%)
    Cobb County, GA, 7/4/2007, ___________________2nd (17.0%)
    California Republican Assembly, 7/1/2007, _______4th (12.0%)
    National Taxpayers Union, 6/16/2007, ___________2nd (16.7%)
    Utah GOP convention, 6/8/2007, _______________2nd (5.4%)

    But I’m sure it is more accurate to rely on the self-selection of Corporate Military Industrial Media-blessed, antiquated landline-telephone polls and the people who choose to answer their phones (and whom happen to be home at the time) and choose to participate in the polls.

  • Tillman Fan, you will always be able to play that game, because we’re all human, and we are none of us perfect. But this moral relativism where people do the “I’ll see you our Larry Craig and David Vitter, and raise you your Ted Kennedy” is a waste of time, because you can play that game forever, no one will ever win, and nothing will be accomplished as a result.

    And if you play the game of “well, he got away with this, so it’s okay for him to get away with that,” you’ll never get anywhere, either, because the country is filled with people who did the same thing and were treated differently. Our system of justice isn’t perfect, it still matters too much who you are, but it’s weighted in favor of the individual and not the government out of the founders’ belief that the government’s power would too easily trample the individual if checks were not built into it.

    I don’t think anyone’s doing any pretending here about the rot – what I see here and on other blogs is no hesitation about calling out any Democrat who is being less than honest, is under investigation or is selling out his or her constituents. I think, on the whole, that Democrats know and understand the trap of hypocrisy and appear to have a better-developed ability to avoid it, probably from having been hung out to dry for engaging in it.

  • Comments are closed.