Guest Post by Morbo
I try to be a reasonable guy when it comes to Christmas. If you want to celebrate the holiday, have at it. Deck your halls, go to church all day, drown in eggnog and charge up that credit card. I really don’t care.
Just don’t try to force everyone to celebrate with you — and don’t expect the government to pay the tab for your seasonal merriment or decorate every public space with your favorite holiday kitsch. Call off your Christmas police who insist that every store clerk use religiously correct farewells, and stop fretting over whether Old Navy is having a “Holiday Clearance” or a “Christmas Sale.” Trust me, Dec. 25 will come either way. Was that so hard?
Apparently so, as we are still receiving massive amounts of whining about an alleged “war on Christmas.” One of the more pathetic columns about this appeared recently in the New York Post, taking the form of a defense of Santa Claus.
Columnist Andrea Peyser quotes comedian Jackie Mason, who, although Jewish, has taken it upon himself to defend Christmas. Mason told Peyser:
“All the yentas and the lawyers and the ACLU and the maniacs decided that Christmas was a danger! We should thank God there’s a holiday that promotes love among people. Even lowlifes feel guilty for doing anything wrong during this season!”
You see, that’s part of the problem. First of all, true lowlifes don’t care that it’s Christmas. They break into people’s houses while they are away shopping and steal presents right out of cars. It happens every year.
More importantly, why would we accept decent behavior from people for one month out of 12? Christmastime has become an excuse for people to pick up cheap grace. Instead of expecting people to be decent, good and caring of their fellow humans all year round, we merely let them do a half-assed imitation of it for three weeks in December. It’s great that people feel moved to toss a toy in the Toys for Tots bin in December for the poor kids. But consider what happens to the poor kids the rest of the year: Let them eat fruit cake.
Yep, we feel all warm and fuzzy in December and write a check to the homeless shelter. A month later, many of its clients are still sleeping under bridges. It’s great that a Christmas train rambles through Appalachia with gifts for the poor kids. The fat man’s red suit blots out an uncomfortable question: Why does the richest nation on Earth accept that these people live in shacks, are malnourished and have no health care?
If Christmas really promoted peace and understanding among people, blowhards like Bill O’Reilly, John Gibson, William Donohue, Jerry Falwell, etc. wouldn’t think it was OK to call everyone who disagrees with them on government’s role in the holiday fascists. Nor would Religious Right groups find it acceptable to sell obnoxious buttons blaring, “I Celebrate CHRISTmas.”
Do suicide bombers and terrorists take the day off? Even if they did, I would still be troubled by the fact that they believe they can blow me to smithereens on Boxing Day.
Let’s face it: The display of “peace on earth, goodwill toward men” that many put on in December is all too often as thin as dollar-store wrapping paper. For too many people, Christmas is excuse to merely adopt a temporary stance of caring.
Santa encompasses the spirit of human kindness? Please. To poor kids, he is a cruel hoax who can’t deliver on his promises, no matter how good you’ve been. Affluent kids laugh at his threats, knowing that on Christmas Day Playstation XXVI will be under the tree no matter what.
To Andrea Peyser and Jackie Mason, such a morally bankrupt symbol may indeed epitomize human kindness. Perhaps he did that once, but these days I see Santa as little more than an ambassador for America’s credit card-driven consumer culture. I really wish the Christmas Police would stop rallying around such a figure and then lecturing the rest of us on the need for forced merriment and jolliness.