‘We should start over’

The National Intelligence Estimate said Iraq is a bloody mess unlikely to improve anytime soon. The Government Accountability Office says Iraq is not making any political or military progress.

And an independent examination of the Iraqi police shows a force that is so far gone, it might need to be scrapped altogether.

An independent commission established by Congress to assess Iraq’s security forces will recommend remaking the 26,000-member national police force to purge it of corrupt officers and Shiite militants suspected of complicity in sectarian killings, administration and military officials said Thursday.

The commission, headed by Gen. James L. Jones, the former top United States commander in Europe, concludes that the rampant sectarianism that has existed since the formation of the police force requires that its current units “be scrapped” and reshaped into a smaller, more elite organization, according to one senior official familiar with the findings. The recommendation is that “we should start over,” the official said.

This is a mess of the highest order. The Iraqi police force, which presumably is responsible for helping keep local communities safe and orderly, is reportedly corrupt to its core and overrun by Shiite militias. We could disband the police force, but when we disbanded the Iraqi Armey in 2003, it generated a backlash that helped create the insurgency. The prospect of putting 26,000 well-armed, angry young men out of work, at our request, is, shall we say, unappealing. For that matter, Iraq would be left with no police force for a few years while we tried to build a new one from scratch. (Commission members surely know this, which suggests they believe the current police force really is that bad.)

We could also try to retrain the police, and remove sectarianism from the ranks, but we’ve tried that before and it hasn’t worked.

Looking at just the past few weeks, this is, of course, the latest in a long line of revelations that Iraq is not improving and our policy isn’t achieving positive results.

Kevin Drum recommends we “take stock” of where we are today.

Pretty much everyone has lost confidence in Nouri al-Maliki, though there’s no replacement in sight who seems like a better bet. The police force is so corrupt that the best advice the Jones commission can offer is to disband it completely and start over from scratch. And the Iraqi army, after three years of intensive training designed by one Gen. David Petraeus, has a grand total of six battalions capable of operating on their own.

In other words, except for the fact that Iraq has a dysfunctional government, a dysfunctional police force, and a barely functional army, things are going great.

I can’t wait to see how Crocker and Petraeus spin this into an argument for staying another four years.

And how Bush is going to justify throwing another $50 billion at a crisis in which all of his proposed solutions have failed.

$50 billion to Iraq? SURE! $50 billion to OUR country to revamp infrastructure; to make education more accessible and affordable; to provide health care for citizens in need? YOU GODDAMN SOCIALIST! COMMIE PINKO!

  • I saw some video- I think it was on PBS or Iraqi soldiers preparing to move out on patrol for the day. They were putting on black ski masks. An American (I don’t recall if it was a soldier or a contractor or what) asked what they were doing and why the masks. “We have a mission today” the masked gunman said. “I can’t tell you more.”

    Nice. The American guy was just left standing there like, “Uh…O…K…Carry on…I guess…” The Shiite soldiers moved out- very obviously on their way to go murder somebody.

    It was among the most stupefying bits of video I’ve ever seen.

  • Send in the A-Team.

    So where the hell is $400M going everyday in Iraq except to enrich Dick’s Private Empire of anational, amoral, imperial corporatists? I’d think you could practically build an Iraqi Police Force a-day with that kind of cash.

  • Um, if we’re going to do this many “do-overs”, may I suggest pulling out of Iraq and invading Cuba?

    Dubya wants to do it anyway, it’s a heckuva lot closer, it’s smaller, there’s no shared borders where insurgents can get help or flee across.

    If we want a “war lab”, Iraq’s a crummy choice. We really shouldn’t be “learning on the job” like this with such a white elephant.

  • Just let go of the peanuts. There really is no other solution.

    The traditional way of catching a monkey (though I don’t approve of such activity) is to embed an open pot in the ground and put some peanuts in it. The monkey puts its hand in, grabs hold of the peanuts, and then can’t get its hand out. It won’t let go its trivial fistful of nuts (Ego’s legacy), and so it gets caught.

    An intelligent monkey, recognizing the terrible cost and dangers of clinging on to its little cache of goodies, would immediately let go and scamper to safety. Sadly, our Chimp-in-Chief adopts the more conservative style of simian attachment.

  • I say we start over by drafting the College Republicans and the military age kids of everyone in congress who wants to continue fighting in the Iraqi Civil War.

    Fucking congressional Dems. They need to stop this goddamn charade. NOW. And put the money into alternative energy so we can leave that place to sort itself out.

  • I say we recall Pelosi and Reid, put someone in charge that will act on the will of the people. If impeachment is off your table Nancy, then I don’t know who’s kitchen you’re in!

  • Sorry, in this universe the arrow of time points in one direction. Starting over does not erase the unintended or intended consequences that earlier attempts created. The bottom line in all of this (aside from the stupidity of an immoral and unnecessary invasion) is that the US has one goal in mind — establishing stability that leads to democracy — and the Iraqis have another set of goals entirely.

  • And how will “starting from scratch” assure that the new police force will be any better?
    As analogies go, Iraq will follow the Yugoslavian model. The religious, ethnic, and tribal divisions have overcome the secular national identity.
    Heck of a job, Georgie!

    Next stop, Iran!

    Gotta keep Saudi Arabia & Israel smiling.

  • Boo Hoo – From the beginning, Iraq has been a black hole of corporate greed, incompetence and a game of three card monte.

    From day one the war has been run by handing out big bags of unmarked bills – what a surprise that the whole effing country is crumbling under the weight of Banana Republicanism!

  • We were told this was a disaster we never should have gotten involved with and now we are buried in it and saying what do we do now? It fascinates me that a Sunni dominated government held the Shiite population under it’s thumb for some 30yrs and now that the positions re switched we expect the Shiites to play fare. Shiites survived and so will the Sunnis under a Shiite dominated government. It’s okay for us to get the hell out. The Iraqi factions will come to their own agreements out of necessity.

    We need to stop policing, refereeing, and interfering in their affairs for our own politically selfish reasons. They will never be a “little America”. It takes more courage and strength to withdraw than it does to remain in their civil war. Iraq is not our bastard child and it is not worth breaking our treasury and our military to whip them into shape. Bush is just obsessed with Iraq and must be forced to let go.

  • Everything is going exactly according to plan in Iraq.

    To you and I, instability and war in Iraq means more lost lives, more lost treasure, more lost respect for our nation.

    To those who actually get to make decisions about this war, this all adds up to more arms sales, more oil revenue, free security guards (ie. American troops) to protect their oil, more profits from supplying support services via no-bid contracts, etc. It’s not conspiracy theory, it’s systems analysis: if a person or group has literally everything to gain from maintaining a given situation, why would we entrust them with the responsibility of ending the situation?

    If the Bush-Cheney-and Friends portfolio were a single publically traded stock, it would go Bear-Stearns the day hostilities ended in Iraq. So why do we discuss these things as though there were any possible merit to them? Would we quibble over the finer points of GM and Chrysler’s proposals for how to end reliance on automobiles, or debate the relative pros and cons of McDonalds’ proposals for how to convince people to stop eating fast food?

  • Comments are closed.