Wednesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* The “escalation” vs “surge” rhetorical debate is surprisingly important in helping shape public opinion. ThinkProgress made a fascinating observation today about the results of a recent CBS poll: when Americans were asked if they support an escalation of forces in Iraq, only 18% said yes. Asked if they support a “short-term troop increase,” approval jumps to 45%. Note to media: word choice matters.

* Former Sen. Rick Santorum (R) acquired plenty of power by helping orchestrate the Republicans’ infamous K Street Project, and now that’s he’s out of politics, he’s ended up … wait for it … on K Street. Santorum has joined a relatively small right-wing think tank, where he’ll head up their “America’s Enemies” program. He’s also poised to join a DC law firm, where he’ll no doubt be a lobbyist.

* Former Sen. Conrad Burns (R), who lost his job in part because of his connections to shady DC lobbyists, has also become a lobbyist.

* Rep. Alan Mollohan (D-W.Va.) now chairs the Commerce, Justice, State Subcommittee on the House Appropriations Committee, which has jurisdiction over the FBI. This has become a point of some contention because of an ongoing FBI investigation of which Mollohan is a part. Today, Mollohan announced he would recuse himself from matters relating to the Justice Department, which, given the circumstances, was the right thing to do.

* Dumb conservative blog post of the day: National Review’s Mona Charen said, “The President also plans to ask for a larger army — a little late and so necessary! It will be interesting to see how the Democrats in Congress handle that one. All that talk of supporting the troops…” That’s dumb, of course, because asking for a larger Army was the congressional Democrats’ idea in the first place, and was even part of John Kerry’s presidential platform.

* With the House getting ready to pass a minimum wage increase, we’re bound to hear a series of unreliable arguments from the right. Media Matters went ahead and preemptively debunked them.

* Pelosi has banned smoking in the Speaker’s Lobby, which “has been one of the last refuges for lawmakers and journalists to light-up during votes.” Minority Leader Boehner, who is a chain smoker, will not be pleased.

* It’s always encouraging to see progress on net neutrality legislation.

* Amazingly enough, yesterday was the first time that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under the Bush White House acknowledged, unequivocally, that a buildup of greenhouse gases was helping warm the climate. The agency wouldn’t get into why there’s a build up of greenhouse gases, but when it comes to this administration, I’ll appreciate acknowledgements of reality where I can find them.

* For reasons that I’ll never fully understand, Time magazine hired Bill Kristol as a columnist recently, and sure enough, Kristol’s first column contradicted the magazine’s own reporting.

* Former congressional candidate and Iraq war vet Paul Hackett subdued three men yesterday with an assault rifle. I’ve seen Hackett; they shouldn’t have messed with him.

* And, finally, House Minority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) was surprisingly, well, blunt yesterday during a chat with reporters. Explaining why he doesn’t need a literal whip to keep the caucus in line, Blunt said, “Probably knee pads would be more appropriate for this job, with these narrow majorities.” C’mon, Blunt, given your leadership role and your audience, you couldn’t show a little class?

If none of these particular items are of interest, consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

Former Sen. Conrad Burns (R), who lost his job in part because of his connections to shady DC lobbyists, has also become a lobbyist.

This effectively ends his chances of being returned to the Senate by the voters of Montana, right? right?!

  • It will be interesting to so how long it will take for Bill Kristol to get in some serious hot water with the real professionals on Time’s staff who very likely take some pride in their work and will not suffer fools like BK gladly.

    Judging by how he’s started off, it may not be very long.

  • * Former congressional candidate and Iraq war vet Paul Hackett subdued three men yesterday with an assault rifle. I’ve seen Hackett; they shouldn’t have messed with him.

    I’m not very impressed with Hackett. There’s some definite questions about the whole incident. They didn’t really mess with Hackett, they just ran into his fence. He took off in his truck after them with his M-16. Their car had stopped in a driveway leaking fluids and he order them to lay down on the grass. He had his assault rifle over his shoulder at the time according to him. He said he didn’t point it during the incident. They’re investigating now.

    I don’t have much problem with the events as described. But he displayed a weapon which luckily seemed to subdue them, but what if it hadn’t? What if, like cops know sometimes happen, they resented him bracing them? If they had been unruly would he have used his rifle? What if they had run? Running into a fence is hardly a capital crime. All the questions need to be answered. I wouldn’t want some redneck with a gun rack, bracing some “hippies”.

    It was probably okay but i’d like to see a complete investigation.

  • …when Americans were asked if the support an escalation of forces in Iraq, only 18% said yes. Asked if they support a “short-term troop increase,” approval jumps to 45%.

    Yeah, semantics matter, but either way you look at it, a majority of Americans, thankfully, oppose it.

  • I agree with Dale that it was a serious incident, however, given that no one was hurt, I’ll give Hacket the benefit of doubt.

    On a lighter note, did anyone else catch the humor in near the end of the story:

    “He said he had done this about 200 times in Iraq, but this time there was not a translation problem,”

  • [Santorum will] head up their “America’s Enemies” program.

    Takes a one to know a one.

    CB, these guys weren’t “messing with” Hackett, they just couldn’t drive. While I understand getting pissed that someone would damage your property and bugger off, the fact that the tracked them down with an assault rifle is…fucked up. I will give Hackett 8.5 points for looks but zero for brains and suggest he might want to think about the possibility of lingering stress issues.

  • I have to laugh, RE. Paul Hackett. The dogs of war havee been unleashed.There is going to be some paranoid individuals running around this country.They are going to respond with the training provided. Go figure.If you want warriors,they will respond as warriors.I don’t think you have even seen the tip of the iceberg yet. Hoooyaaa
    EC Sedgwick

  • Blunt said, “Probably knee pads would be more appropriate for this job, with these narrow majorities.”

    I’m sure that sort of joke will play well with his base.
    Though I suppose they did whoop it up when Laura joked about W masturbating a stallion to completion.

  • Asked if they support a “short-term troop increase,” approval jumps to 45%. Note to media: word choice matters.

    Yeah, but if they knew that they have to extend people or send them back right after getting home, I bet the number would be 18%

  • #7 Sedgewick. True. You did not want to party with the wrong people back when Vietnam was raw. They should have called drugs “instant flashbacks”.

    FOX News Chairman Roger Ailes To Be Given First Amendment Award…
    … honoring Fox News chairman Roger Ailes and two television correspondents gravely injured by IEDs in Iraq, former ABC anchor Bob Woodruff and CBS News correspondent Kimberly Dozier.

    I hope Ailes is able to fulfill his EID requirement before the show. Is that too back flashy?

  • For no apparent reason I’m giving Blunt the benefit of the doubt on the kneepads remark. Maybe he meant “begging” and not “blowing”.

  • #5 “He said he had done this about 200 times in Iraq, but this time there was not a translation problem,”
    Comment by Edo

    That was pretty funny. Then it made me think how much of communication is non-verbal. That night the kids looked at Hackett with a gun and the confident movements of someone who was used to confrontation and they knew they shouldn’t act up. But imagine in Iraq with no language AND not much in the way of shared body language, how many misunderstandings must occur. Many of them deadly.

  • But imagine in Iraq with no language AND not much in the way of shared body language, how many misunderstandings must occur.

    yeah, it really does shed additional light on just how difficult a job we are asking our soldiers and marines to do. And, per comment #7, just how important it is that we provide comprehensive post-combat services to our returning men and women–for them *and* for our society.

  • I think those guys are lucky it was Hackett and not Cheney, otherwise they would have each caught a magazine-full in the face.

  • Maybe he meant “begging” and not “blowing”.

    I don’t know- how likely is it, do you think, that he meant this? Giving someone the benefit of the doubt doesn’t mean presuming that the person must have done something that it was highly unlikely that they did – fabricating excuses for them – giving someone the benefit of the doubt is presuming that someone’s ostensible words and action are in fact a more normatively favorable out of two-or-several possibilities that those words or actions are reasonably, ostensibly consistent with. I’m not giving you the benefit of the doubt when I say that you’re doing something that you really probably weren’t doing.

    Like suppose a person was talking about a person “bending over” or getting “bent over” and it sounded from the context like they were being figurative. No one ever refers to bowing by referring to “bending over” or getting “bent over.” So it’s really unlikely if you hear a colloquial, fluent speaker of English using that expression, that that’s what they meant.

  • “Probably knee pads would be more appropriate for this job…”

    That’s my boy Roy!!!

    Most days it raises my blood pressure thinking of Blunt as my Congressman, today I’m just embarassed.

  • “Enemies of America” does Little Ricky include James Dobson, Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson on that list? Because they sure as hell belong there.

  • Comments are closed.