Wednesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Remember the Baghdad market John McCain was bragging about? The one that was a model for safety and security in Iraq? Horror struck the same market yesterday: “A newborn baby was one of at least 14 children and adults killed when a suicide bomber detonated a lorry laden with explosives close to a primary school in the northern Iraqi city of Kirkuk yesterday. The latest massacre of Iraqi children came as 21 Shia market workers were ambushed, bound and shot dead north of the capital. The victims came from the Baghdad market visited the previous day by John McCain.”

* On a far less serious note, Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.), who accompanied McCain on his extraordinarily well-protected stroll, told reporters that Shorja — where a suicide bomber killed 88 people in January — is now “like a normal outdoor market in Indiana in the summertime.” Apparently, people who work at normal outdoor markets in Indiana don’t see the similarities.

* If you haven’t seen it, be sure to check out this fascinating picture from yesterday’s White House press briefing. It shows Dick Cheney, for no apparent reason, hovering out of sight. What was he doing there? Besides being creepy?

* It looks like the early change to daylight-savings time didn’t have the desired effect: “The early onset of daylight saving time in the USA this year may have been for naught. The move to turn the clocks forward by an hour on March 11 rather than the usual date in early April was mandated by the federal government as an energy-saving effort — but the move appears to have had little effect on power usage.” As my friend R.M. put it, “You mean I’ve been getting up an hour early all this time for nothing?”

* Following up on last week’s revelations about the White House politicizing the General Services Administration, and GSA officials likely violating the Hatch Act, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) pressed the Republican National Committee for emails “that relate to the use of federal agencies and federal resources for partisan political purposes.” (If there’s a Henry Waxman Fan Club, please sign me up.)

* Deputy Press Secretary Dana Perino told CNN that congressional Democrats are “thumbing their noses at the troops,” by passing a funding measure that gives the troops everything they need. It’s almost as if the White House were having a competition to see which staffer could appear the stupidest on national television.

* House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.) hinted yesterday in a letter to Monica Goodling’s lawyer that Goodling would be brought before the committee to invoke the Fifth publicly unless she were willing to meet privately with committee members to explain her reasoning. Her lawyer not only refused cooperation, he also compared Conyers to Joe McCarthy.

* On a related note, Alberto Gonzales still appears unable to pick up much in the way of support from congressional Republicans, who apparently don’t trust him anymore.

* When it comes to the showdown over war funding, Digby noted that Gene Lyons is thinking outside the box: “If President Bush really thinks he’s holding all the cards in his impending showdown with congressional Democrats over Iraq funding, why bother with a veto? On previous occasions when Congress passed laws Bush found irksome, he’s quietly issued ‘signing statements’ declaring in essence that the president is a law unto himself. Statutes Bush doesn’t like, he vows to ignore. He’s done it scores of times.”

* The NYT had a good editorial about the White House blasting critics as “emotionally” unstable: “President Bush and his advisers have made a lot of ridiculous charges about critics of the war in Iraq: they’re unpatriotic, they want the terrorists to win, they don’t support the troops, to cite just a few. But none of these seem quite as absurd as President Bush’s latest suggestion, that critics of the war whose children are at risk are too ’emotional’ to see things clearly.”

* RH Reality Check: “Using membership dues paid in part by federal tax dollars, the National Abstinence Education Association (NAEA) hired the Washington, DC, public relations firm, Creative Response Concepts, best known for the 2004 ‘Swift Boat Veterans’ ads against John Kerry, to launch a public relations effort supporting the failed and unpopular abstinence only education policies.”

* And finally, on NBC’s Nightly News last night, anchor Brian Williams asked Tim Russert if Bush, in threatening to veto an emergency Iraq war supplemental bill that would contain a timeline for troop withdrawal, was making “a calculated bet … that Democrats aren’t really going to vote to leave American soldiers high and dry in the middle of the fight.” There was no mention of Bush leaving soldiers high and dry in the middle of the fight by vetoing the measure that funds the war. Let’s all say it together: what liberal media?

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

I’m too emotionally and mentally exhausted by these morons (the evil Bush administration, the “liberal media”, Darth Cheney potentially running for President) to add anything. I can’t take it. I’m going to go take a bath and drink some wine.

  • Were those poor folks massacred at the market in Baghdad as a reaction to McCain’s visit? Does the senator have blood on his hands due to his nonsensical campaign photo-op?

  • MICHAEL WARE, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Well, what I can tell you from the outset, Suzanne, is that, say, for example, by some bizarre political miracle, Congress was able to impose a real time line, a real deadline on the U.S. presence here or on the funding for the war here. Now that absolutely would play completely into the hands of America’s identified enemies, al Qaeda in Iran. That would be handing the entire advantage to them. That’s why that can never really happen.

    But in terms of the broader debate, in terms of, you know, taking the temperature of the American mood, of the American public, adhering to what’s going on in Congress, looking at the Congressional elections, absolutely do the insurgents, do al Qaeda and does Iran and its proxy organizations in Iraq pay attention?

    Yes, for sure. I mean they know that the most certain way to strike at their enemy is to strike at his support back home. And, indeed, they monitor these things. They know that, you know, what’s happening in D.C. doesn’t really relate to the ground. This is just political artifice.

    Nonetheless, it does tell them about the pressure points to apply. And we saw from 2003 the Baathist insurgents saying from the beginning this war will not be won on the battlefield, it will be won on that—pointing to a TV screen.

    That’s where this war will be won–Suzanne.

  • Something to add…
    From The Writer’s Almanac for 4/4/07:

    On this day in 1968, the civil rights activist Martin Luther King Jr. (books by this author) was assassinated by a rifleman while standing on the second-story balcony of the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee. He had come to Tennessee to support a strike by the city’s sanitation workers. The night before he died, he gave a speech at the Memphis Temple Church in which he said, “I’ve seen the promised land. I may not get there with you. But I want you to know tonight that we, as a people, will get to the Promised Land.”

  • The Democrats are doing a TERRIBLE job of explaining their side of the funding bill if Brian Williams can frame the issue that way without anyone throwing a fit about it today.

    Why do we let crap like that slide?

  • “If President Bush really thinks he’s holding all the cards in his impending showdown with congressional Democrats over Iraq funding, why bother with a veto? On previous occasions when Congress passed laws Bush found irksome, he’s quietly issued ’signing statements’ declaring in essence that the president is a law unto himself. Statutes Bush doesn’t like, he vows to ignore. He’s done it scores of times.”

    I believe I was first to mention that possibility right here on this blog’s comments.If Gene Lyons gets some credit then so should I.Or doesn’t Steve read his comment section?

  • * The NYT had a good editorial about the White House blasting critics as “emotionally” unstable: “President Bush and his advisers have made a lot of ridiculous charges about critics of the war in Iraq: they’re unpatriotic, they want the terrorists to win, they don’t support the troops, to cite just a few. But none of these seem quite as absurd as President Bush’s latest suggestion, that critics of the war whose children are at risk are too ‘emotional’ to see things clearly.”

    Absurd? More like offensive. I’m really suprised that I haven’t seen this attacked yet for being as patently offensive as it is. We can send our sons and daughters to get killed but our opinions on the subject aren’t valid? And Bush, who has no personal stake in this war, and isn’t making any sacrifices in his little war, is somehow better? How does that kind of opinion not deserve a kick to the balls? It’s like saying “You shut up and keep sacrificing, I know best.” Utterly arrogant and Unamerican.

    Re: #10: I can’t speak for CB but generally comments aren’t considered “notable”. Gene Lyons is getting published somewhere, and earned a post on the topic by Digby, which makes it worth repeating. I guess that is the difference.

    But I agree that it sucks that blogs in general don’t tend to use their comments sections to percolate thoughts up much like how blogs now occasionally force issues into the national media. It’s something to work on, I suppose.

  • If you haven’t seen it, be sure to check out this fascinating picture from yesterday’s White House press briefing. It shows Dick Cheney, for no apparent reason, hovering out of sight for no apparent reason. What was he doing there? Besides being creepy?

    Creepy? Nah, just Cheney being Cheney. He’s been hiding behind the bushes since 1988.

  • Brian Williams, if you haven’t noticed before, frames everything that comes out of his mouth to help the administration. Watching him contort the news to be supportive of Bush is painful to watch.

    He behaves toward Bush the way my labrador retriever behaves toward me when I return home. Every inch of him quivers in anticipation of that pat on the head.

  • * Deputy Press Secretary Dana Perino told CNN that congressional Democrats are “thumbing their noses at the troops,” by passing a funding measure that gives the troops everything they need. It’s almost as if the White House were having a competition to see which staffer could appear the stupidest on national television. — CB

    Unless the interviewers start calling the staffers on the BS, nobody but the bloggers will notice their stupidity, so it’ll be like it never happened (if a tree falls in a forest with nobody there to observe it…)

  • John McCain is looking like a satirical caricature of a politician today, in the darkest way. I guess it goes to show how unreliable the media can be.

  • Regarding that picture of Cheney, I wonder if Bush has one of those packs on his back like at the debates so that Cheney can control what he says.

  • “I believe I was first to mention….Or doesn’t Steve read his comment section?” — Bruce Anderson @ 10

    Not entirely sure if you’re serious, but yes, he does. Tracking who said what first, however, would be a monumental task. If it was a joke, I apologize. It’s been a long day.

  • The change to daylight saving time may not have saved much power, but it’s been great up here in the northwest. Seen a lot more people going outside after work and enjoying the extra daylight.

  • We’ve got a real issue with this supplemental being framed as if it’s about funding for the troops — it’s about placing limits on our involvement.

    BUSH is denying funding for the troops because he doesn’t want the conditions that come with it — conditions that a majority of Americans support. So, America, bend over or stand up. If you want Congress to stand firm, you can’t fall for Bush’s framing.

  • What is Darth Cheney doing?

    Peeing in the bushes?

    Checking up on his “dummy” in case he says something wrong?

    Waiting until that moment to unleash his death grip on his dummy?

  • How lucky we all are not to live in Bagdad. What goes on there is just fucking lunacy.

  • > But none of these seem quite as absurd as President Bush’s latest suggestion, that critics of the war whose children are at risk are too ‘emotional’ to see things clearly.”

    Dollars to doughnuts the next comment will accuse all the mothers of the war dead who are speaking out about the war of being “on the rag.”

    Can’t somebody please get those impeachment proceedings sped up?

  • * If you haven’t seen it, be sure to check out this fascinating picture from yesterday’s White House press briefing. It shows Dick Cheney, for no apparent reason, hovering out of sight for no apparent reason. What was he doing there? Besides being creepy?

    Hey—isn’t that the “grassy knoll” guy from the Kennedy assassination conspiracy theory? He’s probably got a rifle with a sniper-scope, ready to do in the dummy if it gets too far off topic….

  • Cheney had to hide in the bushes because he accidentally split his pants and his tail was showing.

  • Or doesn’t Steve read his comment section?

    It’s tough to keep up sometimes, Bruce. I do what I can.

    Sorry if you felt slighted.

  • CB A conscientious blogger would read each comment and reply post haste.

    Actually you do a great job of giving us a steady diet of tasty morsels to digest and appraise. You set a high bar sir.

  • So I guess the 5 rugs Lindsay Graham bought on such a killer deal from impoverished people in a wartorn country really cost 5 bucks plus 21 Shia market workers who were ambushed, bound and shot to death. Maybe Lindsay will go next to Darfur to get a screaming deal on pots and pans from desperate refugees who’ve been raped and whose husbands have been murdered and children dragged off to fight somewhere.

    Lindsay Graham: compassionate conservatism in action.

  • It’s pretty obvious what Dick Cheney is doing; he’s just scrambling out of the big leathery pod where he leaves his alien body during daylight hours. No, seriously, he probably has one of those “are you always going? Going and going?” prostate problems that makes him feel like he needs to whiz about every 20 seconds. If his demon heart won’t explode in a billion anthracite shreds like I keep praying, I’ll take him unexpectedly running about a pint of hot piss through his Joseph A. Bank slacks several times a day.

  • Day late and a dollar short but did Cheney remind anyone else of the King in the Burger King ads?

  • Comments are closed.