Wednesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* We haven’t had too many signing ceremonies lately, so I suppose today was good news: “President Bush signed into law Wednesday legislation that will bring more fuel-efficient vehicles into auto showrooms and require wider use of ethanol, calling it ‘a major step’ toward energy independence and easing global warming. The legislation signed by Bush at a ceremony at the Energy Department requires automakers to increase fuel efficiency by 40 percent to an industry average 35 miles per gallon by 2020. It also ramps up production of ethanol use to 36 billion gallons a year by 2022.”

* Whether the energy bill was a step in the right direction or a massive sell-out is a matter open to some interpretation.

* Over the weekend, the Boston Globe’s Charlie Savage had a great scoop about the Bush administration planning to take control over the promotions of military lawyers and politicize the Judge Advocate General’s Corps. The response to the story was overwhelmingly negative, prompting the administration to back off the plan yesterday. “In light of the feedback that [William Haynes] received, he thought that it was wiser to try a different approach,” Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said. Good move.

* Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott (R-Miss.) officially resigned from the Senate today, though one assumes he hasn’t seen the floor of Congress for the last time — after a one-year waiting period, he’ll be a very high-priced lobbyist. Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour (R) will have 10 days to fill the vacancy.

* ABC News: “The Department of Justice refused to send a representative to answer questions from Congress today on the investigations into allegations of rape and sexual assault on female American contractors. ‘I’m embarrassed that the Department of Justice can’t even come forward,” said the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee John Conyers, D-Mich. ‘This is an absolute disgrace,’ said Conyers. ‘The least we could do is have people from the Department of Justice and the Defense over here talking about how we’re going to straighten out the system right away.'”

* On a related note, Last week, Rep. Ted Poe (R-Texas) said last week that the alleged gang rape of former Halliburton/KBR employee Jamie Leigh Jones in Iraq was not likelly “an isolated case of assault.” Today, Poe said he knows of at least three other women who were the victims of sexual assaults during their service in Baghdad working for KBR.

* Do you know what Rudy Giuliani really needs? Another association with a suspected criminal that makes his ties to Bernie Kerik look worse.

* The Bush administration desperately wants Congress not to investigate the torture-tape controversy. At this point, the House Intelligence Committee is ignoring the administration’s requests.

* David Frum has a new piece trying to get a rise out of the liberal blogosphere. The article is a little thin, though Yglesias and Drum weigh in on Frum’s flawed approach.

* Jonah Goldberg’s new screed isn’t even out yet, and it’s already the most mocked book in ages. Jon Swift has a great post on the book today: “Apparently, Goldberg unearths for the first time shocking similarities between Nazis and liberals. For example, Nazis wanted to clean up the environment. So do liberals! Nazis wanted to cure cancer. So do liberals! Nazis liked organic food and many were vegetarians. So are many liberals! A lot of Nazis were gay and a lot of liberals are, too! Nazis made Volkswagons and liberals love to drive them! Hitler loved dogs and so do many liberals!”

* A hearty congratulations to Digby on her blog’s fifth anniversary. The ‘sphere wouldn’t be the same without Hullabaloo.

* It’s not particularly controversial, but I’m often surprised at how many people haven’t heard: C-SPAN is conservative: “[A] new evaluation by the Center for Economic and Policy Research … finds that right-wing think tanks got 51 percent of C-SPAN’s total coverage in 2006, while left-of-center think tanks only got 18 percent of their coverage (a mere 5 percent of which were “progressive” think tanks). The other 31 percent of coverage went to centrist groups. So what happened to C-SPAN’s stated mission to provide their audience political coverage ‘without editing, commentary or analysis and with a balanced presentation of points of view’? Well, you don’t need editing or commentary to create an imbalanced presentation when you get to choose whose ideas get coverage.”

* John Kerry is already talking about consequences in the wake of Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin’s decision yesterday to rush through a vote on media consolidation: “Chairman Martin was warned that ignoring the will of the Commerce Committee would have consequences, and I will work hard with my colleagues on the appropriations committee to ensure that the FCC’s funding reflects Chairman Martin’s decision to go against the commission’s own charter and limit media diversity rather than foster it.” Obama had some noteworthy reactions, too.

* There was a two-alarm fire in the OEOB — the office building adjacent to the West Wing — today, specifically in the Vice President’s office. (Insert conspiracy theory here.) No one was hurt, and the fire was quickly put out.

* The Yale Book of Quotations released the most memorable quotes of 2007 today, and the number one quote was: “Don’t Tase Me, Bro.” Other notable political additions to the list are Joe Biden’s very amusing shot at Giuliani (“There’s only three things he mentions in a sentence: a noun and a verb and 9/11”) and Larry Craig’s now-infamous explanation for his bathroom run-in with an undercover cop (“[I have] a wide stance when going to the bathroom”).

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

Could be the document processor was on the fritz so Cheney was burning the documents on the grill and it just kind of got away from him. You think?

  • We haven’t had too many signing ceremonies lately, so I suppose today was good news: “President Bush signed into law Wednesday legislation that will bring more fuel-efficient vehicles into auto showrooms and require wider use of ethanol, calling it ‘a major step’ toward energy independence and easing global warming. The legislation signed by Bush at a ceremony at the Energy Department requires automakers to increase fuel efficiency by 40 percent to an industry average 35 miles per gallon by 2020. It also ramps up production of ethanol use to 36 billion gallons a year by 2022.”

    Isn’t this going to hurt his tender relations with King Abdullah? Will there still be friendly intermarriage between their families?

    2020 is a ways away.

  • Here it is people, the whole Craig police interview transcript, found on CNN at http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/30/craig.transcript/index.html

    Read it – NO WHERE DOES CRAIG SAY WIDE STANCE!!!!

    So for those who believe everything they read on this story, and think they know the truth – this most basic detail the media couldn’t get right.

    Transcript of police interview of Sen. Larry Craig
    Story Highlights
    Unedited transcript of police interview after incident in public restroom
    June 11 incident occurred at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport
    Audio tapes and transcript were released August 30
    CNN — The following is an unedited transcript of an interview between police Sgt. Dave Karsnia and police Detective Noel Nelson with Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, regarding a June 11 incident at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. Audiotapes and a transcript of the interview were released today.
    Investigative Sgt. Dave Karsnia #4211 and Detective Noel Nelson of the Minneapolis Police Department intert 1162
    (NN) INTERVIEW WITH Larry Craig (LC) Case 07002008
    Larry Craig: Am I gonna have to fight you in court?
    Dave Karsnia: No. No. I’m not gonna go to court unless you want me there.
    LC: Cause I don’t want to be in court either.
    DK: Ok. I don’t either.
    (inaudible) DK: Urn, here’s the way it works, urn, you’ll you’ll be released today, okay.
    LC: Okay.
    DK: All right. I, I know I can bring you to jail, but that’s not my goal here, okay? (inaudible)
    LC: Don’t do that. You You
    DK: I’m not going to bring you to jail
    LC: You solicited me.
    DK: Okay. We’re going to get, We’re going to get into that. (inaudible)
    LC: Okay.
    DK: But there’s the, there there’s two ways, yes. You can, you can, ah, you can go to court.
    You can plead guilty.
    LC: Yep.
    DK: There’ll be a fine. You won’t have to explain anything. (inaudible) I know.
    LC: Right.
    DK: And you’ll pay a fine, you be (inaudible), done. Or if you want to plead not guilty, ah, and I, I can’t make these decisions for you.
    LC: No, no. Just tell me where I am (inaudible) I need to make this flight.
    DK: Okay. Okay. And then I go to people that are not guilty, then I would have to come to court and end up testifying. So those are the two things, okay. Did I explain that part?
    LC: Yes
    DK: Okay Urn, ah, I’m just going to read you your rights real quick, okay? You got it on?
    Noel Nelson: Yep.
    DK: Okay.
    DK: Ah, the date is 6/11/07 at 1228 hours. Urn, Mr. Craig?
    LC: Yes.
    DK: Sorry about that. (ringing phone)
    DK: You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in court of law. You have the right to talk to a lawyer now or have a present, a lawyer present now or anytime during questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be appointed to you without cost. Do you understand each of these rights the way I have explained them to you?
    LC: I do.
    DK: Do you wish to talk to us at this time?
    LC: I do
    DK: Okay Urn, I just wanna start off with a your side of the story, okay. So, a
    LC: So I go into the bathroom here as I normally do, I’m a commuter too here.
    DK: Okay.
    LC: I sit down, urn, to go to the bathroom and ah, you said our feet bumped. I believe they did, ah, because I reached down and scooted over and urn, the next thing I knew, under the bathroom divider comes a card that says Police. Now, urn, (sigh) that’s about as far as I can take it, I don’t know of anything else. Ah, your foot came toward mine, mine came towards yours, was that natural? I don’t know. Did we bump? Yes. I think we did. You said so. I don’t disagree with that.
    DK: Okay. I don’t want to get into a pissing match here.
    LC: We’re not going to.
    DK: Good. Urn,
    LC: I don’t, ah, I am not gay, I don’t do these kinds of things and…
    DK: It doesn’t matter, I don’t care about sexual preference or anything like that. Here’s your stuff back sir. Urn, I don’t care about sexual preference.
    LC: I know you don’t. You’re out to enforce the law.
    DK: Right.
    LC: But you shouldn’t be out to entrap people either.
    DK: This isn’t entrapment.
    LC: All right.
    DK: Urn, you you’re skipping some parts here, but what what about your hand?
    LC What about it? I reached down, my foot like this. There was a piece of paper on the floor, I picked it up
    DK: Okay.
    LC: What about my hand?
    DK: Well, you’re not being truthful with me, I’m kinda disappointed in you Senator. I’m real disappointed in you right now. Okay. I’m not, just so you know, just like everybody, 1,1,1, treat with dignity, I try to pull them away from the situation
    LC: 1,1
    DK: and not embarrass them.
    LC: I appreciate that.
    DK: And I
    LC: You did that after the stall.
    DK: I will say every person I’ve had so far has told me the truth. We’ve been respectful to each other and then they’ve gone on their way. And I’ve never had to bring anybody to jail because everybody’s been truthful to me.
    LC: I don’t want you to take me to jail and I think.
    DK: I’m not gonna take you to jail as long as your cooperative but I’m not gonna lie. We…
    LC: Did my hand come below the divider? Yes. It did.
    DK: Okay, sir. We deal with people that lie to us everyday.
    LC: I’m sure you do.
    DK: I’m sure you do to sir.
    LC: And gentleman so do I.
    DK: I’m sure you do. We deal with a lot of people that are very bad people. You’re not a bad person.
    LC: No, I don’t think I am.
    DK: Okay, so what I’m telling you, I don’t want to be lied to.
    LC: Okay.
    DK: Okay. So we’ll start over, you’re gonna get out of here. You’re gonna have to pay a fine and that will be it. Okay. I don’t call media, I don’t do any of that type of crap.
    LC: Fine.
    DK: Okay.
    LC: Fine.
    DK: All right, so let’s start from the beginning. You went in the bathroom.
    LC: I went in the bathroom.
    DK: And what did you do when you…
    LC: 1 stood beside the wall, waiting for a stall to open. I got in the stall, sat down, and I started to go to the bathroom. Ah, did our feet come together, apparently they did bump. Well, I won’t dispute that.
    DK: Okay. When I got out of the stall, I noticed other other stalls were open. LC: They were at the time. At the time I entered, 1,1, at the time I entered, I stood and waited.
    DK: Okay.
    LC: They were all busy, you know?
    DK: Were you (inaudible) out here while you were waiting? I could see your eyes. I saw you playing with your fingers and then look up. Play with your fingers and then look up.
    LC: Did I glance at your stall? I was glancing at a stall right beside yours waiting for a fella to empty it. I saw him stand up and therefore I thought it was going to empty.
    DK: How long do you think you stood outside the stalls?
    LC: Oh a minute or two at the most.
    DK: Okay. And when you went in the stalls, then what?
    LC: Sat down.
    DK: Okay. Did you do anything with your feet?
    LC: Positioned them, I don’t know. I don’t know at the time. I’m a fairly wide guy.
    DK: I understand.
    LC: I had to spread my legs.
    DK: Okay.
    LC: When I lower my pants so they won’t slide.
    DK: Okay.
    LC: Did I slide them too close to yours? Did I, I looked down once, your foot was close to mine.
    DK Yes.
    LC Did we bump? Ah, you said so, I don’t recall that, but apparently we were close.
    DK Yeah, well your foot did touch mine, on my side of the stall.
    LC: All right.
    DK: Okay. And then with the hand. Urn, how many times did you put your hand under the stall?
    LC: I don’t recall. I remember reaching down once. There was a piece of toilet paper back behind me and picking it up.
    DK: Okay. Was your was your palm down or up when you were doing that?
    LC: I don’t recall.
    DK: Okay. I recall your palm being up. Okay.
    LC: All right.
    DK: When you pick up a piece of paper off the ground, your palm would be down, when you pick something up.
    LC: Yeah, probably would be. I recall picking the paper up.
    DK: And I know it’s hard to describe here on tape but actually what I saw was your fingers come underneath the stalls, you’re actually ta touching the bottom of the stall divider.
    LC: I don’t recall that.
    DK: You don’t recall
    LC: I don’t believe I did that. I don’t.
    DK: I saw, I saw
    LC: I don’t do those things.
    DK: I saw your left hand and I could see the gold wedding ring when it when it went across. I could see that. On your left hand, I could see that.
    LC: Wait a moment, my left hand was over here.
    DK: I saw there’s a…
    LC: My right hand was next to you.
    DK: I could tell it with my ah, I could tell it was your left hand because your thumb was positioned in a faceward motion. Your thumb was on this side, not on this side.
    LC: Well, we can dispute that. I’m not going to fight you in court and I, I reached down with my right hand to pick up the paper.
    DK: But I’m telling you that I could see that so I know that’s your left hand. Also I could see a gold ring on this finger, so that’s obvious it was the left hand.
    LC: Yeah, okay. My left hand was in the direct opposite of the stall from you.
    DK: Okay. You, you travel through here frequently correct?
    LC: I do
    DK: Um,
    LC: Almost weekly.
    DK: Have you been successful in these bathrooms here before?
    LC: I go to that bathroom regularly
    DK: I mean for any type of other activities.
    LC: No. Absolutely not. I don’t seek activity in bathrooms.
    DK: It’s embarrassing.
    LC: Well it’s embarrassing for both.. I’m not gonna fight you.
    DK: I know you’re not going to fight me. But that’s not the point. I would respect you and I still respect you. I don’t disrespect you but I’m disrespected right now and I’m not tying to act like I have all kinds of power or anything, but you’re sitting here lying to a police officer.
    DK: It’s not a (inaudible) I’m getting from somebody else. I’m (inaudible)
    LC: (inaudible) (Talking over each other)
    DK: I am trained in this and I know what I am doing. And I say you put your hand under there and you’re going to sit there and…
    LC: I admit I put my hand down.
    DK: You put your hand and rubbed it on the bottom of the stall with your left hand.
    LC: No. Wait a moment.
    DK: And I, I’m not dumb, you can say I don’t recall…
    LC: If I had turned sideways, that was the only way I could get my left hand over there.
    DK: it’s not that hard for me to reach. (inaudible) it’s not that hard. I see it happen everyday out here now.
    LC: (inaudible) you do. All right.
    DK: I just, I just, I guess, I guess I’m gonna say I’m just disappointed in you sir. I’m just really am. I expect this from the guy that we get out of the hood. I mean, people vote for you.
    LC: Yes, they do. (inaudible)
    DK: unbelievable, unbelievable.
    LC: I’m a respectable person and I don’t do these kinds of…
    DK: And (inaudible) respect right now though
    LC: But I didn’t use my left hand.
    DK I thought that you…
    LC: I reached down with my right hand like this to pick up a piece of paper.
    DK: Was your gold ring on your right hand at anytime today.
    LC: Of course not, try to get it off, look at it.
    DK: Okay. Then it was your left hand, I saw it with my own eyes.
    LC: All right, you saw something that didn’t happen.
    DK: Embarrassing, embarrassing. No wonder why we’re going down the tubes. Anything to add?
    NN: Uh, no
    DK: Embarrassing. Date is 6/11/07 at 1236 interview is done.
    LC: Okay

  • Jon Swift wrote:

    Nazis liked organic food and many were vegetarians. So are many liberals! A lot of Nazis were gay and a lot of liberals are, too!

    I haven’t clicked through the link yet, so I don’t know how satirical he’s being or how much he’s actually taking Jonah’s actually points and throwing them back in his face for being silly.

    But if this is stuff Goldberg actually wrote, the only Nazi I’ve ever heard of being vegetarian was old Adolf himself (and it didn’t even have anything to do with Nazi ideology, at least not that they promoted– for him it may have been more of a crazy, OCD thing about associating Jewish blood with animal blood, and no one’s even totally sure why he was vegetarian. That’s actually just some historians’ guess. Since he grea up Catholic, and since in Catholicism skipping meat is a symbol of respect for Christ (you don’t eat meat on Friday, the day of the week when Christ died) and since he went vegetarian after his niece, who he was scandaloulsy close to, mysteriously died, and it’s been connected with his guilt over her death, my guess is he had some kind of a quasi-romantic, dysfunctional relationship with her, maybe she was obsessed with him (she supposedly adored him) and he rebuffed her advances, and then in a spurned rage she threatened to harm his reputation, to harm him politically- and then he ended up having something to do with her death. Then, out of guilt, he psychologically “let himself off the hook,” by giving up meat as a “sacrifice” to deal with his guilt over her death. Catholics will tell you that it’s a common part of Catholicism to give up something you like for forty days every year (called Lent) to show your devotion to God.

    Also, there was one prominent Nazi who was gay, and he was also the leader of the SA (the stormtroopers). I alwasy get a big kick out of that. Hitler ended up having him killed, reluctantly. Apparently, he was really useful, but his gayness was just too embarrassing and pissed off too many Nazis. So as far as I’ve heard, Nazi gayness really just had to do with this one guy, too.

  • Hitler is just the type of asshole who would do some cheesy little symbolic thing and think it made it ok for him to murder someone. A lot of conservatives are little pricks like that, too. They try to have their piousness and their evil acts at the same time.

  • jeez, the pantload take the cake. has anyone ever started out a book by breaking godwin’s law?

  • That was a real slap in the face to Al Gore by Time Magazine, wasn’t it? Imagine what the media would have done to him if he’d decided to run. Would have made the 2000 sliming and smearing seem like patty-cake.

    I’m glad he didn’t run, after all. The media might have flushed the issue down the toilet along with Al Gore.

    Imagine what things would be like without the liberal media standing up against the right wing crazies!

  • CB, I am glad you said there are opposing views on the energy bill. it will raise the price of food and beer. The ethanol(corn) subsidies are not good for the country in any way shape or form.

  • Yes, yes, Eric C. Quite right. Accuracy is important.

    The phrase “wide stance” is actually from the written statement (pdf) of the arresting officer who was paraphrasing Craig, That was the first publicly available document, and the source of the widespread news reports.

    Craig himself only actually said “I’m a fairly wide guy”.

    I’m still laughing.

    (ps. did you really need to copy the whole thing? Isn’t that what hyperlinks are for?)

  • Re the “wide stance”-denialist idiocy, the phrase originated from the official police report when Craig was busted for cruising the airport bathroom for gay sex. (To which he pled guilty.)

    http://www.ktvb.com/news/legislature/stories2/ktvbn-aug2807-police_report.7b673027.html

    Craig provided by his Idaho driver’s license. In a recorded post-Miranda interview, Craig stated the following:

    – He has a wide stance when going to the bathroom and that his foot may have touched mine

    Insert collective wingnut Emily Latella imitation, “Oh… never mind.”

  • * There was a two-alarm fire in the OEOB — the office building adjacent to the West Wing — today, specifically in the Vice President’s office. (Insert conspiracy theory here.) — CB

    Either Deadeye stored materials there, which were so hot that they self-ignited, or else that’s where the entire WH (from Shrub and Deadeye down to Perino) kept their spare pants.

  • Tsk, tsk libra. The fire at the Executive Building took place in the Vice President’s “ceremonial offices.” Clearly a candle made out of baby’s blood and Joe Lieberman’s earwax fell over and ignited the pentagram drawn with Iraq oil and the sweat of Gitmo detainees, which then set alight the ebon drapes that shroud The Altar of Utter Darkness.

  • Eric C[raig?] gibbers:

    So for those who believe everything they read on this story, and think they know the truth – this most basic detail the media couldn’t get right.

    Wow! Leaving aside the fact that you’re completely wrong, Craig plead guilty, game over. Stop burning up bandwidth and go tell your dad he’s a schmuck.

  • Melior,

    Thank you for providing the source for that phrase – clearly it was a paraphrase from the officer. Well at least I now know where it came from.

    To the commentor who rightly pointed out I took up too much bandwidth with my comment, I apologize for being somewhat ignorant.

    Thank you,
    Eric

  • Okay. Did you do anything with your feet?
    LC: Positioned them, I don’t know. I don’t know at the time. I’m a fairly wide guy.
    DK: I understand.
    LC: I had to spread my legs.

    I guess this got translated into I have a wide stance…instead of I’m a fairly wide guy, I had to spread my legs. Thanks for setting the record straight…or for being straight about the record, which ever one you prefer.

    Frum just really pisses me off. He ignores truth unless it’s phrased to his liking. But he will never see it, unless his position entitles him to see it. His ego allows him only to see the ‘true’ motivations behind people’s behavior. Think tanks are paid commentary by people devoid of any experience with reality. His accusations are childish and why he was even mentioned as relevant to anything in the way of public discussion is like indulging in mental masturbation without being able to climax. Just frustrating in the end.

    The FCC’s ruling on media ownership is disgraceful. It will give rise to the fourth Reich if not reversed. The FCC used to stand for something. Now they prove themselves corporate lackeys waiting to be rewarded for their decisions when they enter the private sector.

    “Ignoring this administration’s requests” is the best advice for any public or private agency in the country.

    Nazis masturbated to excess…conservatives masturbate to excess…conservatives breathed in the air…conservatives breathe in the air…Nazis believed the rule of law belonged to whoever was most dominate…conservatives believe the rule of law favors whoever is most dominate….Nazis and conservatives have so much in common.
    Jonah Goldberg is too dim witted to keep from vomiting this crap in the public’s face. He deserves the ridicule.

  • Parenthetically, could we please all recall that ethanol, while it might be handy for energy-independance and addressing the eventual depletion of oil supplies, is not a green fuel, but actually is more polluting to burn than oil. It’s not a good idea (even in the nearly-sane cellulose/Brazilian version) to burn this stuff, and it won’t help against global warming, at all.

  • Don Popkey said:

    As the guy who was on the Craig story for over a year, I actually have to agree with the commenter who said that Craig never said wide stance. Sorry folks, but it’s just true, he didn’t.

    Well, if it was in the police report, than he may have said it to the arresting officer. The transcript of an interrogation at the police station has nothing to do with a conversation at the site of an arrest, of which, of course, there is no transcript made.

    Seems this is just as attempt to make the Larry Craig story seem like a conspiracy theory- and the attempt is about as valid as Holocause denial.

    Re: two-alarm fire in the OEOB

    Maybe Cheney got nervous about a bunch of illegal stuff he did, and decided to burn a bunch of his documents right in his White House office, but the fire got out of hand?

  • Sorry folks, but it’s just true, he didn’t.

    No need to apologize. This instance of the GOP Hypocrisy Machine running at 30,000 rpms doesn’t become less hilarious if you take out “Wide Stance.”

    If Larry “Fred Astaire” Craig wasn’t so busy screaming “I’m not gay! And despite my fully voluntary guilty plea I’m not guilty! And pay no attention to those guys who say we had sex!” he might have taken time to correct that particular misconception.

    But he didn’t.

    Because he’s a stinking liar.

    Oh well.

  • In any event, Craig’s explanation was pretty incredible compared to the gay-pickup-sex version. It would be pretty comical if a man standing in a stall actually stood so wide while he was using the toilet that his foot actually touched another man’s, who also happened to place his foot right at / under the stall partition.

    In NJ and NY, at least, men’s public bathrooms are usually silent and grave places. If I was on Family Feud, and had to guess a place you go where you don’t make eye-contact, don’t talk, and don’t touch other people, my 1st or 2nd guess would be a men’s public bathroom (besides church).

    I guess with Idaho Republicans, it may be different, and the first thing you do when you see someone in a men’s bathroom you just saw on the street outside is walk up to him and give him a slap on the butt as a “hello” gesture, and then reach down the front of his drawers to jiggle his junk for a second or two as a manly gesture of friendliness.

  • You know, I’ve actually got to side with those folks against the whole “wide stance” quote. Do you remember when Al Gore was misquoted as saying that he had “invented the Internet”? That still pisses me off, and if I demand intellectual honesty from the frothing retards that propagated (and still repeat) that lie, I suppose I’ve got to demand it of myself as well.

    Dammit.

  • Comments are closed.