Today’s edition of quick hits.
* Economic growth has almost come to a complete halt: “The bruised economy limped through the first quarter, growing at just a 0.6 percent pace as housing and credit problems forced people and businesses alike to hunker down.”
* Paul Krugman tackles anemic growth and the “r” word: “So, GDP was up slightly in the first quarter. Does that mean that we’re not in a recession? The correct answer is, who cares?… The point is that the official definition of recession has become delinked from peoples’ actual experience. Right now, we’re in an economy with deteriorating employment and incomes, collapsing home prices, and business retrenchment. Is it also an economy in recession? Who cares?”
* On a related note: “The Federal Reserve cut a key interest rate by a quarter of a percentage point today, the seventh cut in as many months, continuing its efforts to guard the economy against a steep downturn.”
* After an encouraging dip, casualty rates in Iraq are on the rise again: “The killings of five U.S. soldiers in separate attacks in Baghdad pushed the American death toll for April up to 49, making it the deadliest month since September…. The spike in U.S. troop deaths comes as intense combat has been raging in Sadr City and other neighborhoods between Shiite militants and U.S.-Iraqi troops for more than a month.”
* I’ll have more on this tomorrow, but we learned today that terrorism rates are not improving around the world: “Al-Qaida has rebuilt some of its pre-Sept. 11 capabilities from remote hiding places in Pakistan, leading to a major spike in attacks last year in that country and neighboring Afghanistan, the Bush administration said Wednesday…. More than 22,000 people were killed by terrorists around the world in 2007, 8 percent more than in 2006, although the overall number of attacks fell, the report says.”
* The Dems’ new “100 years” ad can’t be too outrageous to the Republican Party — Fox News has agreed to begin airing it.
* No matter who’s elected in November, I hope treating the troops with more dignity is high on the next president’s to-do list: “Army officials said Tuesday they are inspecting every barracks building worldwide to see whether plumbing and other problems revealed at Fort Bragg, N.C., last week are widespread.”
* A lengthy book could probably be written on the ways in which the Bush gang has utterly decimated the EPA: “A White House budget agency is ‘actually dictating’ which chemicals the Environmental Protection Agency can assess for health impacts, a congressional investigator told a Senate committee Tuesday. John Stephenson, the Government Accountability Office’s director of natural resource programs, told the Senate Environment Committee that the White House Office of Management and Budget not only is closely involved in the chemical assessments but ‘actually dictating which assessments that the EPA can undertake.'”
* On a sort-of related note: “The latest contribution to good government from Vice President Dick Cheney: preventing the implementation of rules to protect the endangered right whale.”
* Apparently, a bunch of right-wing blogs got excited about the notion that the new DNC ad took footage from “Fahrenheit 9/11.” It didn’t.
* According to Bill O’Reilly, the United States never “invaded” Iraq. O’Reilly has, of course, said the opposite many times.
* Is Tim Russert keeping Arianna Huffington off the NBC airwaves?
* The Obama campaign weighed in on the controversy of the day: “In a conference call with reporters, Obama aides tentatively accepted the Women’s Voices Women Vote apology for ill-timed robocalls, but simultaneously compared the calls to deliberate voter suppression tactics. ‘The group has apologized and indicated that it was inadvertent,’ said Obama campaign counsel Bob Bauer, adding that the apology is ‘presumably to be taken at face value.’ But Pricey Harrison, a local Obama supporter on the call, said it was ‘a possibly deliberate attempt to disenfranchise voters.'”
* A deal in the works on FEC commissioners?
* Pentagon bean-counting gone horribly awry.
* Jonathan Alter has a good item in Newsweek on the gas-tax holiday debate.
* And finally, Fox News’ “Fox and Friends” pondered the Clinton campaign’s proposal for a “Lincoln-Douglas style” debate against Barack Obama, but showed an on-air graphic with Frederick Douglas, instead of Stephen Douglas. Um, Fox News? I know it was a long time ago, but you do know that Frederick Douglas and Stephen Douglas were opposites, don’t you?
Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.