Wednesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* The Fed isn’t optimistic: “The Federal Reserve on Wednesday sharply lowered its projection for the U.S. economic growth this year, citing blows from the housing and credit debacles along with zooming energy prices. It also expects higher unemployment and inflation. Even with the more downbeat outlook, Fed officials left the impression that they would not be inclined to cut interest rates further.”

* Political theater: “Amid increasing public outcry over record-shattering oil and gas prices, senators on Wednesday hauled industry executives in to testify about the recent runup. The Senate Judiciary Committee called the hearing to explore the skyrocketing price of oil, which jumped over $4 a barrel to a new record of over $133. The committee grilled executives from Exxon Mobil, ConocoPhillips Co., Shell Oil Co., Chevron and BP as to how their companies can in good conscience make so much money, while American drivers pay so much at the pump.”

* Teddy left the hospital this morning: “Sen. Edward M. Kennedy gave a thumbs up to well-wishers and kisses to relatives as he walked out of the hospital Wednesday, a day after learning he has a cancerous brain tumor. A square bandage at the back of his head marked the spot where doctors performed a biopsy Monday that led them to diagnose the Massachusetts Democrat with malignant glioma. Experts say such tumors are almost always fatal.”

* It’s painful to hear such misguided rhetoric: “Hillary Clinton compared her effort to seat Florida and Michigan delegates to epic American struggles, including those to free the slaves and win the right to vote for blacks and women.”

* Fascinating report; read the whole thing: “There are many problems facing the United States today: a faltering economy, a health-care crisis, and the continuing war in Iraq, to name a few. But viewers of some of the most prominent cable news programs are presented a different reality, one in which one issue stands above all others: illegal immigration. Media Matters Action Network undertook this study in order to document the rhetoric surrounding immigration that is heard on cable news. When it comes to this issue, cable news overflows not just with vitriol, but also with a series of myths that feed viewers’ resentment and fears, seemingly geared toward creating anti-immigrant hysteria.”

* Dan Froomkin reported on a big development that’s gone largely unnoticed: “Top White House officials waved off early warnings from the FBI that interrogation tactics being used on detainees might be illegal, according to a new report from the Justice Department’s inspector general.”

* The NYT keeps needing to run corrections on Bill Kristol’s columns. That should tell the editors something.

* Something to look out for: “John McCain’s campaign is using their campaign website to encourage supporters to post supportive comments on political blogs, including the most well-known liberal site in the blogosphere. And to make things easier, they’re including talking points with which sympathizers can use to get out the McCain message…. McCain supporters are asked to send the details of their comment to the campaign, which in turn will verify it and then reward the supporter with ‘points’ (assumedly to accumulate for McCain swag).”

* Hmm: “The U.S. military, in a shift, has postponed the release of a report detailing allegations of Iranian support for Iraqi insurgents, according to people familiar with the matter.”

* Of all the possible responses to the new ad from VoteVets.org, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) appears to have picked the worst one.

* EPA scandal, Part I: “The head of the Environmental Protection Agency refused to say Tuesday whether he had any specific discussions with President Bush that would have caused him to reverse his agency’s position and deny a waiver California needed to move ahead with stringent auto emission standards.”

* EPA scandal, Part II: “A Senate panel voted narrowly Wednesday to overturn EPA’s decision blocking California and more than a dozen other states from limiting greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles. The bill by California Democrat Barbara Boxer passed the Environment and Public Works committee 10 to 9, sending it to the full Senate.”

* McCain finally seems to have learned who runs Iran. It’s about time.

* Michael Savage is beneath contempt.

* Alex Castellanos is no better.

* Douglas Feith believes we found “a serious WMD threat” in Iraq. Poor guy is clearly confused.

* Geraldine Ferraro went on Fox News today to complain about “black journalists” who, she believes, have been unfair to Hillary Clinton. I miss the time when Geraldine Ferraro was a respected figure. I really do.

* And finally, Obama drew 75,000 people for an event in Oregon over the weekend, but some conservatives are crying foul because the Decemberists, a Portland-based indie rock band, appeared at the show, which some on the right argue exaggerated the numbers for the campaign. Jason Linkins argues that the right is off base, since as the Decemberists “are a modestly successful indie outfit, more apt to perform at venues such as the 1,200-person capacity 9:30 Club, it would be more accurate to suggest that the promise of an Obama rally is a great inducement to come see the Decemberists, rather than the reverse.”

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

I’ve been warning you for months about this loom:

“Hillary Clinton compared her effort to seat Florida and Michigan delegates to epic American struggles, including those to free the slaves and win the right to vote for blacks and women.”

It is a Clinton.
Expect nothing less than the worst.

  • RE: Michael Savage

    Does he have a column? I’d like to run him in this Sunday’s Post. I’m sure it would get the most hits of any Op-Ed this week.

  • McCain is actively encouraging trolling? Just effing great.

    Hillary thinks seating MI and FL is akin to freeing the slaves? Then I guess her agreeing to their loss of delegates is akin to owning slaves.

    She needs to go now. Not just out of the campaign, out of the party. I’m done with her.

  • but some conservatives are crying foul because the Decemberists,

    Isn’t their claim to fame pretty much that Stephen Colbert accused them of copying his ninja style green-screen contest? I’d rather go to a crowd where Mertyl Cobertyl the turtle was going to be.

  • I am concerned that Democrats are going too hard on McCain. Voters don’t want that kind of divisiveness. People believe McCain has integrity, so we should feed into that. I’ve been a Democrat for fifty years, and if Obama continues to veer this far to the left, I’m going to vote for McCain.

  • I look forward to the day – perhaps some day in late 2008 or early 2009 – when I start seeing little ads on the blogs that read something like this:

    “Team Clinton Cruise! A 7-day, 6-night cruise on a luxurious Holland America Line cruise ship sailing out of Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, with stops in Cozumel, Grand Cayman Islands, and Jamaica. Featuring ad-hoc sessions, private seminars, and private receptions with numerous speakers and luminaries, including President Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, James Carville, Lanny Davis, Sidney Blumenthal, Terry McAuliffe, Howard Wolfson, and Geraldine Ferraro. Ample opportunity to eat and mingle with the luminaries. Travel and party with like-minded Clinton fans. All-inclusive pricing. Price depends on accomodations.”

  • Hillary Clinton compared her effort to seat Florida and Michigan delegates to epic American struggles, including those to free the slaves and win the right to vote for blacks and women.

    I’d completely forgotten about the time blacks were told their votes wouldn’t be counted, but they were used to beat a black candidate in spite of the fact he actually followed the rules. What year was that anyway?

  • I have to agree with doubtful here. Hillary is so far gone at this point that I don’t think there’s any coming back for her. Time to start thinking about who to run against her in the next Senate primary– he or she already has my vote.

  • Everyone keeps talking about how there’s no problem with Clinton staying in as long as she’s not doing damage, and I agree, but can we stop defining damage narrowly as “outright snarking at Barack Obama?” For my money, the damage she and Bill are doing to the party and Democrats with this self-dramatizing, outrageous spinning and outright lying about Michigan and Florida is likely to cause long-term pain to Democrats because very low-information, high-dudgeon voters who don’t know any better keep falling for this crap. Is there anybody on this planet Clinton will listen to at this point when they tell her to stop dragging the entire Democratic effort down with her? (Hmmm…is there anyone on this planet she respects enough to listen to? That one’s worth speculating on.)

    And speaking of out-of-control sore losers, you know that elderly, bad-tempered aunt who comes to every Thanksgiving dinner, gets loaded and starts making wildly inappropriate remarks about people who don’t look like her? Your family puts up with her because they know she’ll leave at the end of the evening and you don’t have to see her for another year. Ferraro is like the embittered, plastered aunt who has no idea how much she’s embarrassing herself, but this time Thanksgiving’s been over for months and damned if she isn’t still here.

  • Clinton’s “Plan B” will be to move on from her humiliating defeat at the hands of those “terrible Obamo-fascists” (of which I am a proud, card-carrying charter member-for-life), gather together all the white-folk states where many, many people think that wearing a pillowcase on your head is a fashion statement—and form the New Confederate Secessionist Queendom of Rodhamtopia.

    Or at least it was her plan B, until she started making all those “free the slaves” comments. You just don’t play the “White-People-For-Me” card by talking about Scary Black Guy to the denizens of BubbaVania—and then remind them about setting all the Scary Black People free before the forefathers of the reality-based community beat the First Confederacy back into the Primordial Soup Age more than 140 years ago.

    ***Okay, little bear—now it’s your turn….

  • Just one more voice to call Major BS on the Clinton’s dishonest and deceptive effort to frame the seating of the Florida and Michigan delegates as a Nobel Civil Rights issue.

    SNL had it dead on.

    Why is Hillary staying in the race?

    1. She exploited racism and now has a hard core support from white racists.

    2. She has No Ethical Standards.

    3. She is a bitter, sore loser.

    And note to feminists. Her screed of losing because of sexism is so outrageous that she will stir up a backlash and resentment that will impede support for legitimate civil rights issues such as reproductive rights and sexual preference.

    Their selfishness seems to have no limits. They would indeed sacrifice and destroy Obama if the they could get away with it, but they will be stopped by those who realize the stakes are to great— and far from worth the risk and cost of a Bush third term and the complete theocratic takeover of the Judiciary and Supreme Court.

    And second note to the Ferraro/Feminism=Racism crowd’ glass ceiling bla bla.—two words— Nancy Pelosi. Unlike Ferraro, the racist drunk, and Hillary, dishonest sleaze owing her position to a sleazy rapist, women abusing who she enable, Nancy has intellect, character and leadership.

  • It’s painful to hear such misguided rhetoric: “Hillary Clinton compared her effort to seat Florida and Michigan delegates to epic American struggles, including those to free the slaves and win the right to vote for blacks and women.”

    Misguided rhetoric–well, that’s a polite, tactful way to put it. Myself, I would call it outrageous, offensive, and an insult to slaves, oppressed African Americans, and suffragists. I have some other words as well, but I’m trying to remember that my mother attempted to raise me to be a lady.

  • Steve, are you going to do anything about your trolls running amuck?

    Not a single thing they’ve said in this thread is true.

    …And they accuse Clinton of hurting the party.

    Has anyone the quote from Clinton yesterday? “I’ve been told I’ve gotten more votes than any other Democratic Primary Candidate to come before…” ‘Cause none of these trolls apparently actually knew the right quote. And no one has shown to me it’s false.

  • “There are many problems facing the United States today: a faltering economy, a health-care crisis, and the continuing war in Iraq, to name a few. But viewers of some of the most prominent cable news programs are presented a different reality, one in which one issue stands above all others: illegal immigration.”

    Excuse me, but the one topic that stands above all others is the horse race, to the absolute exclusion of anything that is going on in the world. For months and months and months we’ve been saturated with the daily back and forth between Obama and Hillary with mountains of demographic information and repetitive speculations about a race that was settled three months ago. Viewers could easily forget what the hell these candidates are running for, because the issues never get discussed.

    Except, ironically, one issue, immigration, does get discussed, albeit only by one side, the bigots who hate the immigrants, on some programs. But at least they talk about one of the issues. Nobody else talks about any issues ever..

  • I think it makes us Democrats look really bad to talk about Savage like this. This kind of mean spiritedness will turn off independent voters.

  • As I recall, Kristol is on the NYT op-ed page for a six-month trial period. He’s obviously embarassing the self-styled newspaper-of-record with his sloppy commentaries, which is no surprise. He’s not subject to any fact-checking at all at the Weekly Standard, and the Times only does it in response to the blogosphere. This may be a reality check for the moon-faced prevaricator. He won’t see it that way, and spin his trashing, which should be a thrashing, by the NYT, when it hopefully comes, as a liberal conspiracy. Everything in his delusional world is.

  • Crissa @ 16

    Clinton’s comments about receiving most of the votes is actually false. She does not count caucus votes, whose popular votes have not been allocated yet, nor does she include the ‘uncommitted’ totals from Michigan from the votes who would have gone to Obama or Edwards – had they been on the ballot, which obviously Obama has a percentage of – towards their totals. Oregon hasn’t been included yet, pending the mail-in vote tallies.

    http://www.newsweek.com/id/138109

  • Let’s see how much McCain staffer time we can waste.

    Another little jewel: you can flag *offensive* posts there (without registration, even!) I’ve actually been successful with a few 🙂 🙂 :)) Of course some little gnome somewhere has to consider each and every flag issue…

    There’s one Obama fan (“diverdown”) over there waging war entirely by himself.

    It’s our American duty to help out.

  • Why is Hillary staying in the race?

    Don’t forget – she also is getting help from rush and kkkarl – the is the repug/neocon’s choice because:

    (1). If she wins nomination, they can either beat her or cover-up/distract from a stolen election because she is so divisive and the can drag up all of the crap that happened under bill. Remember, this is what launched rush into the national scene and enabled the repugs to take over congress in an unprecedented come-back.

    (2). If Obama wins, she is “catapulting the propaganda” now – mclame can’t beat him, but they can hammer and hammer the lies and create the distractions/talking points needed to steal the election (like 2000 & 2004)

    NO BUSH-CLINTON-BUSH-CLINTON junta – she is running a shameless campaign. Historic opportunity – Obama can win without the ignorant, racist Appalachian crowd.

    It is time to take the party back.

    It is time to end the era when the most ignorant, racist Americans decided who would run this country.

  • Crissa, who’s misquoting Clinton and, more important, why the heck does it matter?

    The popular vote isn’t the standard for the nomination. The delegate count is. It always has been the standard, and it was the standard that the Clinton campaign agreed too.

    And with good reason. Caucus states don’t have a representative vote count to include (which is why the Clinton math excludes four of them), and the various primary states have different rules for who can vote (just registered Democrats, or open to all, or whatever). Trying to get an accurate measure of the “popular will” from the popular vote is like adding up apples and oranges and 12 other kinds of fruit.

    It’s pathetic.

  • crissa – the vast majority of commenters know that American was not founded to be an elite monarchy of 2 families: bush-clinton-bush-clinton.

    Our democracy is not NASCAR – you are the dishonest troll, but then, you are one of shillary’s lying liars – so its what we expect.

    Each and every day, we post links to fully discredit your lies. Each and every day you come back and post them again.

    We see through you – the good news is folks like you won’t matter in November 2008 because shillary’s ignorant mountain folks are no longer going to be the tail that wags the democratic party.

  • hark – its not really a horse race – Obama will win. I have no problem with shillary staying in and gracefully losing – infact, I will enjoy it.

    The problem is she is “catapulting” kkkarl rove’s talking points now and is largely in the race because of rush limbaugh’s support. She is going to provide the cover for another stolen election.

    Well, if she somehow steals the nomination, mclame might be able to actually win.

    THAT’S WHY HIS ADVISOR KKKARL ROVE SUPPORTS SHILLARY!

    What part of that don’t you understand?

  • How come shillary is now coddling up to the “vast right wing conspiracy” that undermined bill?

    How come she is silent on rush limbaugh’s dishonest operation chaos?

    Why does she now see kkkarl rove as a trustworthy source and analyst when he is a mclame advisor?

    Where is the outrage? Has she no shame?

  • Crissa

    “I’m told that more people have voted for me than for anyone who has ever run for the Democratic nomination,” Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, said last night after her impressive win in Kentucky.

    Really hard to find too. Google search: Clinton popular vote.

    http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/05/more-on-clinton.html

    I especially liked this one:

    NEW YORK In an interview with The Washington Post’s Lois Romano, Hillary Clinton hit “sexism” in media coverage of her campaign as “deeply offensive to millions of women.” She criticized the “vitriol” from “misogynists” and said that the race factor was often discussed but not gender: “[E]very poll I’ve seen show more people would be reluctant to vote for a woman to vote for an African American, which rarely gets reported on, either.”

    I agree – very, very lame.

  • My apologies in advance for a third posting, I promise I’ll stop after this.

    What is the argument anyway that Clinton is not hurting the democrats by stating that she is ahead in the popular vote? I think we got away from ourselves here. Regardless of the exact quote, she is still trying to shake up the race that she has no mathematical chance of winning anyway.

  • Oh Crissa, you sound bitter.

    The ‘I’ve been told’ construction is just a cop out. It’s a way to put a lie out there without taking the responsibility for it.

    Like when Bush says he was told there were WMDs in Iraq. None of us are buying that he didn’t know any differently just like none of us are buying the Clinton doesn’t know she’s not winning the popular vote, or any other honest metric for that matter.

  • FedUp – what’s with the apology? It isn’t like you are bouncing anyone off the board. Its not like this is a drive-by range.

    If you have something to share – share it.

    While I am glad this blog isn’t one of the “superblogs” with threads of 300+ comments where everyone insults and proclaims the post above them is a troll, it is fun (and informative) to read most of what gets posted.

    Of course, then there’s the likes of mary, greg, mark pencil, crissa…

    But they add something to the dialog (it just usually isn’t honest).

  • From the “YOU CAN’T MAKE SH#T LIKE THIS UP” department – check out the lastest from shillary’s biggest on-air advocate:

    Limbaugh on Dem primary: If “feminazis” had remembered to oppose “affirmative action for black guys … they wouldn’t face the situation they face today”

    Read more:

    On the May 21 edition of his nationally syndicated radio show, Rush Limbaugh asserted that “one of the objectives of the feminazis over the last 20, 25 years has been to dominate the public education system so as to remove the competitive nature of boys. You know, there’s a crisis of young man-boy education in the schools. And they did this on purpose, to eliminate male competition in the work force. This is part of feminazi grand plan.” Limbaugh then said, “They forgot affirmative action for black guys. And because of that, every bit of their plan has gone up in smoke now, because they — if — they had to come out in favor of affirmative action for black guys, and that’s — see, this is one of the things that really irritates the women. And there are women all over this country fit to be tied — trust me on this. … [L]iberals eventually are going to be devoured by their own policies. And it has happened here. Because [Sen.] Barack Obama is an affirmative action candidate.” He concluded, “So, it’s just — they just forgot that one thing: affirmative action for black guys. And if they had remembered to oppose that, then they wouldn’t face the situation they face today.”

    http://mediamatters.org/items/200805210009?f=h_latest

    So what do crissa, mary, greg, mark pencil, and the rest of that gang have to say about this? Where is shillary on this?

  • EVERY negative notion and concept about the clinton’s has been multiplied by a hundred by this craven, ugly spectacle. Whatever the outcome, she’s finished. I hope she enjoys her final toxic minutes on the big stage.

    She will be remebered as one of the vilest figures in american politics.

  • While I am glad this blog isn’t one of the “superblogs” with threads of 300+ comments where everyone insults and proclaims the post above them is a troll, it is fun (and informative) to read most of what gets posted.

    True, not everyone here does that little bear. just you. and it makes it much less informative for the rest of us, and near as I can tell from the usual reaction to your posts, less fun, too.

    project much?

  • Fed Up, at least in your first reply, you got the quote and time right.

    …But you didn’t prove that she was lying. You just went and found another quote to attack.

    Of course, I don’t believe she’s winning the popular vote. But that doesn’t matter: What matters is the trolls here and elsewhere believing they can choose Obama without accepting Clinton’s more Liberal platform. They spew misogynist, racist creeds, and then link Clinton with Republicans.

    Except there’s one candidate that (when he has voted) has shared the most votes with Clinton in Congress… Obama.

  • She will be remembered as one of the vilest figures in american politics.

    Interestingly,she and her supporters are being welcomed with open arms over at the McCain blog. You’d think they’re in the same party, for chrissake. Maybe she’ll be his VP?

    It’s not that I don’t like Clinton’s platform, Crissa. I truly don’t like her or her behavior. And haven’t since since, well hell, since her godawful health care fiasco. Nor did I like the fact that so many of my feminist friends back then were so hell-bent on seeing her through to this point, nothing else mattered. Not her character, not her self-centered actions, nothing! And her vote for the war, that was it for me. I still can not believe she would do such an idiotshit thing.

    She’s not the Queen of American Women. She reminds me a lot of Sigourney Weaver’s bitch boss character in “Working Girls”, portrayed with the very essence of shallowness. She gets hers and the rest of us, well we can shine her boots and pick up her pantsuits at the cleaners.

  • “Hillary Clinton compared her effort to seat Florida and Michigan delegates to epic American struggles, including those to free the slaves and win the right to vote for blacks and women.”

    Som much for Mrs. Slickster Moron getting any “positive points” for having apparently seen the light over the past week since her meaningless WV win and appearing to be a “good Demorat.”

    The Clintons are always Clintonistas first and the Democrats can take what’s lesft.

    Pathetic bunch of traitors they are and worthless incompetent she is.

    As the the Grampy trolls, I assume discovery of one will result in immediate banning here, right?

  • I don’t get it. Do Miss Mudd and Tom Cleaver not want to seat the delegates? Is it somehow inconsistent to have agreed to not campaign there yet want them seated anyhow?

    Has Obama gone and voted differently than Clinton lately? McCain voted similar?

    No?

    Then stop lying. Spewing trash. Whatever.

  • Hey Mark, I’m sure I don’t have to tell you, cuz you’re probably doing it already, but…

    you KNOW what you can do with that pencil..///

  • I is like McLain much. He saved the building and the gold and the school, bcuz he was smarter like them yerpians. Him and Bony Bedla wuld be gud white house. He culd WAR dose bad ones like we know, and such. U no, Canda and Treton. I want my munny now.

  • What matters is the trolls here and elsewhere believing they can choose Obama without accepting Clinton’s more Liberal platform.

    It’s called democracy, crissa. When a majority of people choose a candidate, that candidate wins.

    I personally preferred Edwards more aggressive platform to that of either Obama or Clinton. But you know what? Not enough of my fellow Democrats agreed with me and he didn’t get the delegates he needed to continue on in the contest. I would have loved to see him carry on — heck, I didn’t even get a chance to vote for him — but the math wasn’t there, and he fell by the wayside. Not what I personally wanted, but that’s the way it works.

    I’m sure the Clinton backers feel just as passionately about their candidate as I feel about Edwards — or backers of Dodd, Richardson, Biden, etc. feel about them — but the only way you’re entitled to have your candidate’s platform and policies put at the forefront is if your candidate wins.

    Again, it’s called democracy. Look into it.

  • Note how crissy had to add “lately” – when they are both on the road and campagning – as if that somehow discounts some of the biggest differences in their votes

    i.e IRAQ WAR

    i.e. BANKRUPTCY REFORM – which clinton missed without any good excuse (Obama voted NAY)

    But if you are a liberal/progressive – there are define that campaigns (geeee, we don’t have to let rush limbaugh and kkkarl rove define it)

    They are graphically illustrated HERE (National Journal’s 27th annual vote ratings).

    Guess crissa, greg, mary, and mark pencil would rather we ignore this and listen to rush and kkkarl and the lying liars.

  • Has crissa ever posted anything about shillary that is demonstratively and objectively true? Shillary certainly isn’t the most “liberal” – but it is not just that lie, there are new ones each and every day (and the old ones get reposted here until kkkarl or rush has a new one).

    And why don’t hillary, crissa, mark pencil , mary, greg and the like spout off about limbaugh?

  • Again, it’s called democracy. Look into it.

    Some believe in a MONARCHY and support bush-clinton-bush-clinton which for bill clinton would be great. Then he and poppy could share their newfound love together in the White House.

  • mark with the little rubber tip on his stick – I know that you are numerically challenged – but we tend to get a thread of about 30 people that mostly agree, though there are some trolls.

    This is vastly different than a thread of 300+ where each comment is an insult of the one above – not that I expect you to recognize or post facts.

    Do you see that this is difference of a factor of 10?

    Here’s a link if you need help:

    http://www.purplemath.com/modules/factnumb.htm

    And except for a few that insist on continually posting the dishonest/racist propaganda from kkkarl, rush, and hillary, its a dialog here.

  • What I do see, little bear, is out of 52 posts in this thread, 13 are yours. One our of every four. There are certainly way more than 4 contributors in this community. Think perhaps your scroll rate is a little excessive? Particuarly since about 2/3 of your posts are non-substantive, baiting, or repetitive?

    Why is it too much to ask that you discuss things in a reasonable manner rather than hogging the bandwidth? I know you can, I’ve seen you do it. Ironically, I noted that when someone pointed out that you had actually made a positive contribution the other day, you then reverted to form. Whats up with that?

  • mark – post more lies if you want to “balance the bandwidth.”

    Who made you GOD OF CARPETBAGGER anyhow.

    And please, don’t point that little rubber thing at the end of your stick at me.

  • damn – 15 out of 54 now!

    Boy that is gonna piss our little blog-cop off!

  • mark – will put this in the most simplest terms as possible:

    I AM NOT YOUR MONKEY!

  • so much for trying to be helpful.

    but you’d be considerably more credible if you could point to even one “lie” i’ve ever posted. that is a pretty bold accusation, after all. i’d be interested in whether you can back it up or whether the world gets more proof you’re full of hot air.

    so put up – show those lies of mine. take your time. i’ll be around.

  • Comments are closed.