Wednesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* No big surprise: “For the 2nd time this year, a federal judge has thrown out a lawsuit filed by a Florida democrat delegate angry over party rules that have threatened to keep Florida Delegates from being seated at the upcoming Democratic Convention. Once again US District Judge Richard A. Lazzara ruled Wednesday the DNC did not violate any laws in stripping Florida’s delegates of their voting powers.”

* The White House pushback against Scott McClellan intensified as the day has gone on: “Former White House counselor Dan Bartlett lashed out at Scott McClellan in a telephone interview Wednesday, saying the allegations that the media was soft on the White House are ‘total crap.'”

* On a related note, Republicans probably won’t care for this, either: “On Thursday morning, Scott McClellan will be interviewed on NBC’s ‘Today’ show. That night, it’s MSNBC. Indeed, Keith Olbermann has scored the first cable interview with McClellan on Thursday night on ‘Countdown,’ according to a network release.”

* I’ll have more on this in the morning: “President Bush said Wednesday that rebuilding Iraq and Afghanistan while battles rage is proving difficult, and ‘we’re learning as we go.'”

* In the credit-where-credit-is-due department, the Supreme Court did the right thing yesterday, ruling that “employees are protected from retaliation when they complain about discrimination in the workplace, adopting a broad interpretation of workers’ rights under two federal civil rights laws.”

* I’m actually starting to feel encouraged: “Signaling a generational shift in attitudes, a new Field Poll on Tuesday said California voters now support legal marriage between same-sex couples and oppose a state constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage. By 51 to 42 percent, state voters believe gay couples have the right to marry, according to a May 17-26 poll of 1,052 registered voters.”

* As part of the criminal investigation against Rep. Rick Renzi (R-Ariz.), prosecutors have questioned John McCain staffers.

* It’s about freakin’ time: “The oil giant ExxonMobil has admitted that its support for lobby groups that question the science of climate change may have hindered action to tackle global warming. In its corporate citizenship report, released last week, ExxonMobil says it intends to cut funds to several groups that ‘divert attention’ from the need to find new sources of clean energy.”

* The WaPo had an interesting item on MSNBC getting all kinds of criticism of late. Republicans insist the network leans to the left, but I suspect the network brass won’t want to mess with what works: “NBC executives say the ratings growth at MSNBC — up 61 percent this month in prime time, compared with a year ago — has made it a target.”

* Reporters, for reasons that defy comprehension, continue to buy into the GOP spin that says Obama thinks hunters use handguns to hunt ducks. He doesn’t.

* Which pollsters have done the best in predicting the results this year? FiveThirtyEight takes a look with a helpful analysis.

* I didn’t realize Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.) opposes the death penalty. Good for him.

* Will McCain keep Hagee’s campaign contribution?

* I don’t want to alarm anyone, but it appears that Republican policies make the gap between rich and poor considerably worse. Shocking, I know.

* Can’t say I blame them: “With eight months left in President Bush’s term, scores of senior officials already are heading for the exits, leaving nearly half the administration’s top political positions vacant or filled by temporary appointees, federal statistics show.”

* Bush, McCain, and the longest 47 seconds ever.

* And finally, Dana Perino told reporters that Bush “doesn’t wish for a third term.” I guess it’s unanimous then.

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

Guess I’m part of that California majority.

  • Re: the 47 seconds….after Bush got on the plane, McCain started back to the limo. But nooo… Sad for him -the limo is off-limits without Shrub. Turned around…where do I go????

    HAHAHHAAHAHAAHAAHAAHHA

  • Among the more fascinating if less significant revelations in Scott McClellan’s new book is his discussion of George W. Bush’s past use of cocaine. Bush, McClellan now claims, told him he couldn’t remember whether or not he used coke. That, of course, is a far cry from the response of Governor Bush offered Americans during the 2000 campaign. And as it turns out, McClellan, too, was telling the public white lies.

    For the details, see:
    “White Lies: McClellan Then and Now on Bush’s Cocaine Use.”

  • The WaPo story on how godawfully far left MSNBC has drifted is by Howard Kurtz, who’s made a career of trying to cast anything more liberal than Fox (or his own Fox-like show on CNN) out of the mainstream.

  • Can we add my conspiracy theory of the day: McClellan’s book was released early to help McCain and Hillary. Both were being hit big time. McCain would have to deal with his adviser/lobbyist friend. Hillary may have had to endure another day of either RFK-gate or Lanny-gate. Either way, Republicans lose.

    Since the book was going to come out anyway next week, why not release it now and at least get some advantage out of it.

  • Furious, nobody cares that Bush used coke or lied about it because he’s not a Democrat. Besides, at this point, both drug usage and lying about it are a highpoint for Bush. It helps distract from the truly horrible things he’s done.

    Hell, I betcha he’d see a real bounce in his approval ratings if he sparked up a fatty during his next press conference. Honestly, how many of you out there wouldn’t think a little better of him after that?

  • In the credit-where-credit-is-due department, the Supreme Court did the right thing yesterday, ruling that “employees are protected from retaliation when they complain about discrimination in the workplace, adopting a broad interpretation of workers’ rights under two federal civil rights laws.”

    I’m glad you mentioned this. Note also that there were actually two cases involving this issue; Roberts and Alito were both in the majority on one of them (indeed, Alito wrote one of the majority opinions), while Alito was in the majority and Roberts dissented on the basis of perceived legislative intent in the other. Thomas and Scalia were the only justices to dissent in both cases. As I’ve said before, there is room for some optimism that Roberts and Alito are not going to be the fire-breathing reactionaries that many fear they will be. On culture war stuff like abortion and gay marriage I’m pretty sure they’ll be right there with Scalia and Thomas, but the Supreme Court does a lot more than that, and I really think we’re going to see that the two newer justices, Roberts in particular, are capable of being somewhat less ideologically rigid than the hard-core conservative wing of the Court.

  • The WaPo had an interesting item on MSNBC getting all kinds of criticism of late. Republicans insist the network leans to the left…

    In the black and white world of modern conservatism, all truth is contained within conservative ideology. If you use the brain god presumably gave you for any purpose other than memorizing and recalling conservative talking points, you’re far left. If you use the eyes and ears god presumably gave you to see or hear real-world evidence that contradicts conservative ideology, you’re far left. Like nearly all religions, the ideology is infallible, although believers frequently fail the ideology through lack of faith and personal shortcomings. To question conservatism is blasphemous.

  • “For the 2nd time this year, a federal judge has thrown out a lawsuit filed by a Florida democrat delegate angry over party rules….”

    A ‘democrat delegate’? Apparently, ABC gets his wire feed right from the GOP playbook…

    Homer

  • “With eight months left in President Bush’s term, scores of senior officials already are heading for the exits, leaving nearly half the administration’s top political positions vacant or filled by temporary appointees, federal statistics show.”

    The really sad thing is that nobody can tell the difference. They were never there to fulfill the duties of their positions, only to support the neocons’ march to global domination and to be cheerleaders for the diktats of the Dear Leader.

    To paraphrase a line from Firefly, they’re going to “that special hell” reserved for traitors and thieves, every last one of them.

  • * Will McCain keep Hagee’s campaign contribution?

    The paltry $1000? What’s really interesting in that table is that Hagee’s heart belonged to Huckabee; he maxed out there ($2300); McCain is definitely a second choice.

    * Bush, McCain, and the longest 47 seconds ever

    For some reason, I can never get to view your Salon references. My puter says it’s “done” loading but all I get is the masthead over a blank page.

    In the “Anything to add?” category:

    Over at the electoral-vote.com, the Votemaster is floating an interesting idea. He thinks that, between now and Tuesday, Obama will be releasing 2-3 of his superdels, so as to allow the *voters* (of Montana and South Dakota) the satisfaction of flipping him over the final number barrier needed for the nomination. I find it believable because it’s exactly the kind of thoughtful and elegant maneouvre that I have come to expect of Obama.

  • “GOP spin that says Obama thinks hunters use handguns to hunt ducks.” No doubt the next silly Repug smear they’ll dream up will be something on the order of “Obama wears brown contact lenses to hide his blue eyes and look more black (oops — ethnic — heh).” It must be rough sitting around all day trying to come up with new nonsense.

  • BREAKING!

    Obama Campaign Staff Member is Federal Lobbyist for Foreign Government

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/28/AR2008052802499.html?hpid=topnews

    Okay, the foreign government is Puerto Rico.

    But still!

    Okay, but the staff member is an unpaid volunteer.

    But still!

    Okay, this situation doesn’t violate Obama’s rules.

    But still!

    The truth is that Puerto Rico is a colony, and the volunteer in question isn’t even able to legally vote in the presidential election! He may not even speek English! Foreigners are taking over the Obama campaign!

  • SCOTUS: “employees are protected from retaliation when they complain about discrimination in the workplace….”

    Putting on my cynics’ hat for a second, I wonder how many justices will support remedies for actual workers’ actual claims of discrimination, not only their right to have their suits slapped down without discrimination?

  • As I was sitting in the green room waiting to do my on-air interview about my two latest books (Watch Out Honkey, Obama’s Gonna Get Your Momma and Watch Out Mr. Black Man Sir, Obama’s Gonna Get Your Momma Too) I was thinking that there seem to be a lot of misconceptions about Senator Obama. I thought it might be because he hasn’t been on the scene for very long. Then I thought that the more publicity a person gets the less we know about them.

  • Dan Bartlett lashed out at Scott McClellan in a telephone interview Wednesday, saying the allegations that the media was soft on the White House are ‘total crap.’

    Gotta give Bartlett his due: he’s right on this. The media haven’t been ‘soft’ on Bush at all. They’ve been comatose.

    Except for the wonderful and never sufficiently praised Helen Thomas, of course; and the miserable pricks demoted her to the back row and totally marginalized her because they were and are terrified of her. Too bad not a single one of the other worthless press corpse sleepwalkers wouldn’t back her up.

  • * Reporters, for reasons that defy comprehension, continue to buy into the GOP spin that says Obama thinks hunters use handguns to hunt ducks. He doesn’t.

    He does. But then he’s just really really good.

  • Has the media gone nuts or something? For five years we have heard revelation after revelation, including the Downing Street Memos, about the fraudulent lead-up to the war, all confirming what any thinking human being believed before the war. The media has steadfastly ignored, pooh-poohed, or dismissed as old news all these reports.

    And now, Scott McClellan comes out with a book which exonerates Bush and casts a few aspersions upon his advisors, and a firestorm erupts throughout the media and the whole damn lead-up is being revisited, as if the possibility that Bush and company haven’t been completely straight forward with the American people is a totally unexpected nuclear bombshell.

    To top it all off, McClellan’s allegations are rather mild compared to what we all know to be the truth.

    I don’t get it.

  • And talk about complacency in our air-mindedness as a presumably “morally superior” society!

    And Another Thing: Fox Prolefeed is seeking out “stories” of so-called “voter fraud”, which, methinks, are all the likely to be incredible when all is said and done. Especially considering the likelihood of some offering their “stories” as a way out of serious financial problems when, in fact, the influence of Al Cohol may be all the more prevalent.

  • Shows how out of step I am. I thought it would have been neat if Obama didn’t really know how ducks are slaughtered. But it turns out that’s a pretty awful gaffe. Could cost him the election if we don’t set this right.

  • MsJoanne said:Hey, Dale…FYI, your Website URL isn’t right. You transposed blogspot.

    Thanks Ms Joanne. I noticed my blog hits were down by a couple. And since a couple is all I get it really hurts my ad revenues. 🙂

    Hey I perfected John’s firefox script. I changed it so I show ONLY my own comments! Actually being able to do that comes in handy when I check to see if I want to harvest any for my blogposts. Also I wrote a little script for myself that pops up the number of days Bush has left in office whenever I enter the comments section. I’ll probably take it out though since even 237 is depressing.

    I notice that you, MsJoanne, write many good comments over here that would serve as post on your own blog.

  • Nothing to add except that Dr. Biobrain and Dale always entertain. Special felicitations for posts #6, 15 and 17. That is all.

  • .. I betcha he’d see a real bounce in his approval ratings if he sparked up a fatty during his next press conference. Honestly, how many of you out there wouldn’t think a little better of him after that?

    Any lab tech can teach a chimp to smoke a joint. Color me unimpressed.

  • … I really think we’re going to see that the two newer justices, Roberts in particular, are capable of being somewhat less ideologically rigid than the hard-core conservative wing of the Court.

    That’s akin to saying you’re somewhat less dead if you shot in the head than if you get stabbed through the heart. Roberts and Alito are CONSERVATIVES, period. There’s already been plenty of fodder for the average frothing fascist to be happy about (voter id, workplace discrimination). Gaia help us all when the Robertson crowd figures out a way to challenge Roe v Wade head-on.

  • I just don’t understand why federal judges in Florida don’t seem to care that Florida has turned into Zimbabwe. Has Mugabe corrupted them all?

  • Oh, Dale…help me! I couldn’t figure out how to get that GreaseMonkey to work at all!

    I want to block Shillary…what an obnoxious moniker…can you help? Post a comment on my blog and I will email you. (If you’re so inclined, that is.)

    Thanks for any assistance you might provide!!!!

    As for my blog, I tend to write very long, detailed and highly researched posts. I would overwhelm poor Mr. Benen if I put them here. I get a bug up my butt and have at it. Right now, I am reading hundreds of pages of executive orders and all that. Can you say DRY READING? Yeah, thought you could. 😀 I used to post more stuff here but some of my posts on my blog take many days to research and write.

    Steve would probably kill me if I posted anything anywhere near as long as the one on Bush being charged with war crimes.

    Live Frankly

  • Holy cow! I thought “our Mary”, an insane fake professor (though *not* THE Insane Fake Professor) was the apogee of nuttiness and the ultimate practitioner of the “through the looking glass” school-of-illogic. Shows me how much I know of the outside-of-reason world… 🙂

    Here’s an article, by a real professor this time, which beats “our Mary” hollow. The premise is… Obama is an unmanly wimp, unfit to be a president. Because? Because, unlike Willie Wanker, he’s been faithful to his wife all these years…
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sylvia-welsh/the-shrinkage-factor_b_103068.html

  • libra, I saw that earlier. How ridiculous is that? Only girly men don’t cheat? If that’s the case, why did everyone go apeshit when BillC got his blow jobs?

    Give me a break. What an idiotic post that one was.

    That woman should be tarred and feathered.

  • Keith Olbermann has scored the first cable interview with McClellan…

    …After a hundred times more people will have seen McClellan on the Today Show. What’s the big deal about a cable interview?

    By the way, I distinctly remember never doing cocaine. My memory is very good on that subject.

    I also remember many a Duck Hunt where I used a handgun. Of course, it was on the Nintendo.

  • Grumpy, I got such a kick out of that. No, I don’t remember rolling up that hundred dollar bill, bending over and sucking that white powder up my nose. Nope. No recollection of that whatsoever.

  • Grumpy said:
    I also remember many a Duck Hunt where I used a handgun. Of course, it was on the Nintendo.

    The only two guys I can think of who used a handgun to hunt were William S. Burroughs and Hunter Thompson.

  • Maria said:

    Nothing to add except that Dr. Biobrain and Dale always entertain. Special felicitations for posts #6, 15 and 17. That is all.

    Thank you Maria. I always look for your informative comments.

  • WOW – some great ammo to start wackin’ mclame with – and fortunately, Obama is ready and willing.

    Unfortunately, shillary is still up to the same ol’ crap – feels entitled to White House cuz she slept in the Lincoln bedroom or something…

    When rush limbaugh’s favorite fake democratic candidate quits catapulting kkkarl rove’s lies – we can have a real campaign.

    Too bad shillary did not run an honest campaign where she actually went after republicans.

    Check this out: Obama says he’ll review every Bush executive order with his & overturn any that violate Constitution.

    http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2008/05/28/bushs-laws-will-be-scrutinized-if-i-become-president-obama-says/

    That’s some meaningful campaignin’ folks, and all shillary can do is lie and talk about assassinations.

  • MsJoanne said:
    Click to view comment.

    Oh, Dale…help me! I couldn’t figure out how to get that GreaseMonkey to work at all!

    My email is on my blog. Cleaver emails me from there when he gets mad at me. 🙂

    Let me know how far you got.

  • Re Renzi and McCain

    I posted about McCain’s very good friend, Wes Gullett, lobbying for a suspicious Arizona land swap in 2005 at the TPM Cafe today.

    It also appears that Gullett was lobbying Senate Committee on Indian Affairs Chairman McCain on Indian gaming at the same time that McCain was investigating Jack Abramoff for lobbying on Indian gaming.

    At almost the same time the 2000 McCain campaign started up, Gullett and other McCain campaign advisors were hired by defense contractor, Lockheed Martin. Backdoor campaign financing?

    Wes Gullett was McCain’s senate admin assistant who adopted the other baby that Cindy McCain brought home from Bangladesh. I think McCain owes Gullett for sparing him some political embarassment on that one.

    As reported in the New Yorker in 2005, Gullett and McCain have done 14-hour stints together at the craps table.

  • Reading blogs cuts into my newspaper reading time, so I only just now got to today’s NYT (paper edition). The following is a photo from the front page of today’s (May 28) paper.

    In the recent earthquake in China, a peculiar thing happened: schools for the poor collapsed, crushing estimated 10 thousand children. At the same time, official buildings and schools for the elite, although in the same area, stood untouched. Parents of the killed children are beginning to shake off their initial numb grief and are asking questions. The photo shows an official — the communist party boss of an affected area. He assumes the position I’d like to see Bush/Cheney gang assume. Can’t promise I’d forgive them, but it would go *some* way towards assuaging my anger…
    http://www.nytimes.com/indexes/2008/05/28/pageone/scan/index.html

  • The WaPo story on how godawfully far left MSNBC has drifted is by Howard Kurtz, who’s made a career of trying to cast anything more liberal than Fox (or his own Fox-like show on CNN) out of the mainstream.

    Howie-wowie baby is also married to a veteran Republican operative. How do these nice Jewish boys end up married to the Bitch of Belsen???

  • As I’ve said before, there is room for some optimism that Roberts and Alito are not going to be the fire-breathing reactionaries that many fear they will be. On culture war stuff like abortion and gay marriage I’m pretty sure they’ll be right there with Scalia and Thomas, but the Supreme Court does a lot more than that, and I really think we’re going to see that the two newer justices, Roberts in particular, are capable of being somewhat less ideologically rigid than the hard-core conservative wing of the Court.

    Nope.

    What most people here fail to recognize are that – for Republicans and their corporate masters – the important cases before the SC are hardly ever (outside of this one time and a couple others) the kind of cases that make headlines, but they are the kinds of cases that cement corporate domination and institutional irresponsibility into the law. And on those cases, which the court decides 80% of the time in favor of the scum,. Roberts and Alito are always aboard. In fact, these cases today may be the only ones where they haven’t been the reliable corporate shills they were appointed to be.

  • John, if you happen to see this…YOU. ROCK!

    That script is AMAZING! Thank you so much for sharing!!! I am now officially shillary free! Woo hoo!!

    And Dale, thank you! Thank you! Thank you!

  • http://www.amazon.com/Churchill-Hitler-Unnecessary-War-Britain/dp/030740515X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1212038277&sr=8-1

    In Nazi sympathizer news, Pat Buchanan has a new book blaming Great Britain for WW2. Among their mistakes: “The greatest blunder in British history: the unsolicited war guarantee to Poland of March 1939—that guaranteed the Second World War”. How naive, you might argue; Hitler would have invaded France eventually anyway. Not in Pat’s mind. In his view it seems Hitler would have fought Stalin and the evil commies, saving us from the Cold War.

  • 40. Tom Cleaver said: What most people here fail to recognize are that – for Republicans and their corporate masters – the important cases before the SC are hardly ever (outside of this one time and a couple others) the kind of cases that make headlines, but they are the kinds of cases that cement corporate domination and institutional irresponsibility into the law. And on those cases, which the court decides 80% of the time in favor of the scum,. Roberts and Alito are always aboard. In fact, these cases today may be the only ones where they haven’t been the reliable corporate shills they were appointed to be.

    Stevens and Souter are almost always on board for those cases too, as is Breyer on occasion. Unfortunately, we are far past the point where 1 or 2 votes would change the Supreme Court’s severe pro-corporate bias.

  • ms joanne – I just scroll past your rants – I know you think you are a blog-queen, but we can read recycled news from thinkprogress, democratic underground, buzzflash, and kos from the source.

    – not a shillary fan

  • Will Olbermann have the presence of mind to ask Scott about the military message force multipliers?

  • Tom,

    I’m not exactly sure what sorts of cases you and Shalimar are referring to, but I would point out that Gomez-Perez and CBOCS West— the two cases decided yesterday that CB mentioned above– are both cases in which the Court sided with the individual employee against corporate interests. If you’d care to cite some examples of the cases you view as the “really” important ones, that might be helpful.

  • Boy, TR…that’s some site (and the one they link to). Calling a WW2 vet a Sheehanite struck me as wildly amusing. Very young, stupid, uneducated, pliable and gullible kids.

    I can only hope that this is the minority of the youth of our nation. Alas….

  • Comments are closed.