Wednesday’s political round-up

Today’s installment of campaign-related news items that wouldn’t generate a post of their own, but may be of interest to political observers:

* Bush used to be an unstoppable fundraising machine for the GOP. Not anymore: “Financial projections for the President’s Dinner tonight confirm that Republican confidence in the president is in a state of collapse. The National Republican Congressional Committee’s (NRCC) fundraising goal is $7.5 million, which is half what was raised last year. But to reach this lesser goal, each individual lawmaker has been asked to raise the same amount as 12 months ago. In other words, the NRCC is assuming lawmakers won’t be either willing or able to hit the targets they managed last year.”

* Subscribers to the always-conservative Jerusalem Post received an email solicitation yesterday from the Giuliani campaign, which characterized Dems as being unreliable allies of Israel. In an odd twist, the pitch wasn’t sent specifically by Team Giuliani, but rather from the newspaper itself. (In the “from” column of the email, it said, “The Jerusalem Post.”) As Greg Sargent explained, “There’s nothing untoward about sending out fundraising mail to lists that are rented from others — campaigns do that all the time. However, it does seem a bit unorthodox for the sender of the email to be identified as the newspaper, and not the campaign.”

* NBC’s Chuck Todd thinks the McCain campaign is faltering badly and may not recover: “Can Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the initial GOP front-runner, raise enough money by the time the second-quarter campaign finance books close on June 30 to survive and continue on? While his candidacy might not be dead, it is, at best, on life support at this point.” The Washington Times added this morning that McCain’s campaign “is showing signs of unraveling.”

* With polls showing him leading in Iowa and New Hampshire, Mitt Romney hopes to solidify his position with additional television advertising. The NYT reports, “[Romney] has spent some $4 million on television advertising since February, focusing mostly on Iowa and New Hampshire… He increased his advertising in a huge way last month, spending more than $2 million, much of it on national cable advertisements. This month, he added a run of television commercials in South Carolina, another early primary.” None of the other leading GOP candidates have aired television spots.

* And Hillary Clinton got a boost in Nevada yesterday when Dana Titus, the Dems’ gubernatorial nominee last year, endorsed the New York senator.

In the Bush fundraising article, Olympia Snowe says this: “Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) said she thinks her former GOP colleagues Sens. Mike DeWine (Ohio) and Lincoln Chafee (R.I.) lost reelection because of Bush’s unpopularity. “It’s definitely because of the president and his policies, more from the standpoint of immovability and not being willing to adjust policies in response to real-time circumstances,” she said. “It wasn’t just the fact that things weren’t working well in Iraq, it was the president wasn’t willing to adjust his policy to recognize and acknowledge that.””

I guess the fact that these dumbass GOP Senators/former Senators supported Bush’s policies and voted with him near lockstep for the 6 years prior to their ousters had nothing to due with their getting tossed. If they can’t even be honest with themselves, how can they be honest with the American people? It really is true that GOP/Conservatives are responsibility (and usually accountability) free.

  • * NBC’s Chuck Todd thinks the McCain campaign is faltering badly and may not recover:

    Duh. Anyone who spent any time reading the excellent articles in the blogosphere saw this months ago. What new genius revelation will Chuck come up with? Paris Hilton is a spoiled brat?

  • I completely agree that things don’t look good for McCain, but I can’t help but wonder if (barring an entrance from Thomson) he’ll be the one to remain standing. Everytime Giuliani says something, we all become a little dumber (great post on the 12 commitments btw), and I just don’t think Romney has the staying power.

  • If the president is unpopular because of his policies, then someone running for office who supports those policies is not paying attention to his or her constituents.

    I understand the whole thing about loyalty to the party, but I do not understand placing loyalty to policies put forth by a president from one’s party over the interests and wishes of the people one purports to represent.

    If the few people in the Congress who are supposed to be their voice are not speaking for them, the people will find someone who will.

    Unfortunately, a lot of our politcians are only listening to the money, and not the people.

  • I think Brian Schweitzer of Montana is a pretty smart guy but he told Charlie Rose he likes Romney the best out of the Republican field and that they became close on a trip to Iraq together. I don’t know what to make of that, but I still think Romney is a caveman. Too bad Schweitzer won’t run himself.

    It’s too bad all of the choices for president are so mediocre. We didn’t know how good we had it with Al Gore.

  • The Jerusalem Post = Another proud puppet of the Neocon Media Monopoly.

    Of which the Dow Jones will soon become another endentured servant if another buyer doesn’t show up pretty darn snappy. 🙁

  • Oh, so Olympia is lamenting the reduced ranks of the Mod Squad, eh? If she’s that incensed about it, why doesn’t she, I dunno, pull a Jeffords, go independent, and caucus with the Dems? (Yeah, yeah, I know, she’s a New England Republican by marriage, twice over. But, come on– she’s so pro-environment, her own party wants nothing to do with her! Plus, if I were she, I would’ve turned away from Bush back in 2000 when he called Greeks “Grecians!”)

  • Oh, and Haik, I think Schweitzer’s positive comments about Romney might be strategic. Wouldn’t it be great if Romney got the nomination and the southern theocons sat on their hands and didn’t turn out, resulting in a Democratic victory? I’m personally hoping for a Gore/Obama ticket, but if Al doesn’t run, I hope Obama gets the nomination . . . and picks Schweitzer as his running mate.

    Oh, and CB, I just noticed the item on Hillary’s latest endorsement– it’s DINA Titus, not Dana.

  • Comments are closed.