Welcoming the party switchers

The American Prospect’s Benjamin Weyl had a great item yesterday on what’s slowly become an important phenomenon: Republicans leaving the [tag]GOP[/tag] and becoming Dems.

Kansas is the epicenter of [tag]party[/tag]-[tag]switch[/tag]ers, with nine former [tag]Republicans [/tag]running for office as [tag]Democrats[/tag], including Gov. Kathleen Sebelius’ (D) running mate, who was no less than the former state GOP chairman.

But Weyl notes that it’s not just Kansas. A prominent Republican in South Carolina recently switched parties; retired NBA star Charles Barkely is considering a gubernatorial campaign in Alabama as a Dem (“I was a Republican,” he said. “Until they lost their minds”); and in Virginia, Senate candidate James Webb was a Dem, became a Republican, and recently switched back.

Some voters and activists may have reservations about supporting candidates they believe can win but who may not conform to party orthodoxy. When it comes to ex-Republican candidates, the question of Democratic authenticity — not to mention ideological acceptability — becomes even more glaring. But if the party is big enough to house everyone from Baucus to Boxer, surely it can welcome Republican converts, especially in places like Kansas and Virginia where Democrats need to become more competitive if they ever hope to regain majority party status.

“The more converts you get, the bigger the party you have. Are there going to be some people inside the Democratic Party who are resentful of switchers? Yes, there are people like that,” said political analyst Stuart Rothenberg. “[But] of course it’s better for the Democrats to get those switches because it means: a) the party is attractive to people who it wasn’t attractive to in the past; and b) that’s how parties grow!”

Maybe some Dems will look askance at recent-converts to the Dem cause, but as I see it, the more Republicans who leave the GOP in disgust, and embrace Democrats for a new direction, the better.

I suspect there’s a strong under-current of disappointment among the Republican rank-and-file. Maybe they’re hesitant to admit it, and perhaps they hold back in response to polling questions, but what’s left of the GOP center can’t be satisfied with the direction of their party.

As the country witnesses the massive failure of Republican governance, coupled with the increasing isolation and elimination of the party’s moderate wing, large swaths of the electorate may be up for grabs. Webb thinks so.

He says that despite his party switch, his basic beliefs haven’t changed. “I’m a realist on foreign policy, a moderate on social policy, and a populist on economic policy,” he said. “Thirty years ago, the Republican Party embraced people like me. Today, however, the Republicans’ extreme wing has pulled the party so far outside the mainstream that a lot of people who share my basic beliefs are looking for new leadership.” If he is right, and if more Americans who share Webb’s views start heading to their county election offices, the current trickle could turn into a flood — one that could carry Democrats back to power.

Disgusted Republicans are probably broken up into two large categories: those who are dejected because the GOP has gone so far to the right, and a smaller group who are disappointed the party hasn’t gone right enough. For the latter, there’s little chance of them even giving the Dems a second glance.

But the prior believe in balanced budgets, sensible foreign policy, competent and ethical governing, and the separation of church and state — and they lament how far their party has strayed. For them, I have a message: come on over; the water’s fine.

I’ve said it here and elsewhere before and I will continue to say it–I really think that the time is right (if not overdue) for folks like Soros and some of the other big money members of the Dem nation to put together a community type election war chest “earmarked” for current GOP politicians who wish to leave the GOP and join the Dem party (or even go independent but caucus with the Dems). The two biggest things right now keeping true moderate republicans in the GOP fold are money, and threats by the party to withhold the money from those who do not tow the GOP line. I think your post above validates this idea.

  • Great, a bunch of politicians who see the GOP ship sinking and are trying to save their butts. I’m happy the GOP is falling apart and if we can have Dems representing Kansas and South Carolina all the better.

  • Bubba’s right. Welcome GOP defectors — it takes more than political opportunism to bolt one’s party — and back that welcome up with support.

  • if folks want to switch parties, fine

    but if i were a republican who cared about the party, i would not switch,

    i would vote straight-line democrat this election and maybe the next.

    i would do so with the expectation that causing the current right-wing, authoritarian, religious-based republican party to lose badly in the fall of 06 and the fall of 08 would allow more sensible conservatives to move back into positions of power in the republican party.

    right now the republican party is no more than the republican wing of the old southern democratic party (think newt gingrich, tom delay, dick army, george bush),

    most properly denominated as

    the Republican Authoritarian Theocratic Capitalist party

    RATC’s for short .

    (one can pronounce that with a broad “a” (rat c) or a short “o” (rot c)).

    this country really does need a competent republican party – a party competent to govern if and where elected. we don’t have that now and the cost to our society of the 1994-2006 RATC interregnum has been enormous.

  • I guess this is good, but isn’t there a risk of these guys just being Marshall Whitman-types who will just do what they can to drag the party to the right from within?

  • The main trick is politics is forming a successful coalition of the sane against the insane. (paraphrase of Sterling Newberry) For many years, that “coalition of the sane” was bipartisanship, that centrist desiderata, of which Dean Broder is so fond. The pragmatic leaders of both Parties cooperated with the opposition to craft policy and contain the crazies in their own, respective Parties.

    Today, the crazies have completely taken over the Republican Party. The Republican Party is the party of torture, national bankruptcy, corporate corruption, authoritarianism and theocracy. The coalition of the sane, if one is to form, must form within the Democratic Party, alone.

    The hostility in the Democratic Party between center and left — the potshots the DLC regularly took in its Sister Soujah moments — as well as the despair of liberals at Republican-lite Presidents like Clinton — is basically incompatible with the kind of coherent partisan machine the Democrats have to become.

    The Democrats have to grow a New Democratic Right, taking in the sane, rational, decent, secular refugees from the Republican Party, and, yet, tame the mutual hostility and resentmentments, which have characterized the dynamics of Democratic Party politics since the 1960’s. The difficulty of assimilating a New Democratic Right is made easier by two things. 1.) Unlike the old Democratic right, e.g. Lieberman or Cuellar, the New Democratic Right is defined by its intense hostility to Republicanism. Kos, Lamont, Webb, Tester, Hackett need concede nothing to Barney Frank in terms of their passionate disgust with Republicanism. 2.) The now old Democratic Left has been suitably chastened by the experience of 2000; even Michael Moore is not voting for Nader any time soon.

    The really tough sell in all of this are two groups. First, the corporate right-wing media and their punditocracy, which is willing or able to channel the narratives of the New Democratic Right, accurately. The Media is still owned by the core constituency of the now crazy Republican Party; they will try to marginalize the swelling ranks of the New Democratic Right and of the whole, increasingly powerful Democratic Party.

    A slightly easier sell will be the punch-drunk veteran rump leadership of the Democratic Party — the now Old Democratic Right of Dianne Feinstein and Joe Biden (D-MBNA). All that ails this group can be relieved by the simple elixir of power; in that respect, all depends on success in November.

  • Wittman’s a different case. He’s a loud and proud non-Democrat, a guy so infatuated with his own integrity and so certain that he knows what’s best for the nation that he eschews partisan politics. It’s why he defends Lieberman so loudly and persistently. (And *that’s* why I’m so looking forward to checking out his blog Wednesday morning.)

    Not to blog-whore, but I wrote about Wittman and Lieberman yesterday at my blog, if anyone’s interested.

  • So these guys realize their band of brothers are a bunch of idiots/wackos. Bet if GWB numbers were up they would be singing a different tune, or rather beating the drum harder and louder then ever.

    It’s not that we should be appreciative of these folks, at least they seem to realize that maybe blind faith isn’t the best thing for America. But are they really becoming democrats or are they becoming non-crazy republicans ?

    I think that in the spectrum of politics, this past 6 years has really slid to the right and I think the line that distinguishes the two parties has also slid, so these moderate republicans now find themselves in the Democrat camp.

    Are these people going to bring the left closer to the right ? Are they going to effect our party in a negative way? I think the answer is yes, but at the same time, we need the numbers (votes). Just seems like we might be letting our standards down for votes. But in politics, votes are the gas that run the machine.

    So I am optimistic, but with some heavily guarded optimism.

  • One thing I’d like to note insofar as Republican defectors to the Democratic Party, at least insofar as people who might think about grumbling or questioning loyalties or even expecting them to vote along party lines is, if such people give the Democratic Party a chance to win seats in places where they might normally not have expected to do so, then that’s great! Perhaps these people may not vote with the Democratic Party all of the time, which is fine with me. But the simple fact that they have chosen to put the (D) after their name rather than (R) or even (I) helps give the Democratic Party the majority in the houses of Congress, and thus the power to control the agenda, head the committees, etc…

    In my opinion, accomodating some people who have views somewhat to the right without giving them such a hard time that they consider going back to the Republican Party is certainly worth it in order to give the main Democratic Party the power to do what they need to (i.e., actually acting as a check on the executive branch’s power, putting important issues on the congressional calendar instead of silly proposals with the sole purpose of appeasement of the “base”, etc)…

  • As for me, I’ll continue to remember the old axiom: “Beware the Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing.”

    Granted, it may well be that a fair number of GOPpers are leaving their party in disgust; yet, it might also be that a fair number of GOPpers realize that they can no longer swim to an easy victory with that big rusty GOP anvil chained to their ankle. I have serious concerns of what this country would become, if Democrats started electig fistfuls of Republicans, just because the candidates had a “D” next to their names on the ballots.

    We’re talking about people who are abandoning ship because their luxury ship isn’t working the way they want it to work; people who are becoming Democrats not because they WANT to become Democrats, but because they want to be on the winning side—and the GOP has a great big “L” on its forehead right now. People who had no problem bashing, thrashing, trashing, and slandering anything that was “non-GOP” before they realized that their little empire was on its way down the political toilet.

    “Trust” is a thing to be earned—and these folks have a whole lot of “earning” to do….

  • Scott makes a great point.

    Will someone refresh my memory, does old Joe have an ‘R’ or ‘D’ behind his name ? An army of Lieberman’s is going to do nothing for our party.
    If these guys come over and tow the republican line like Joe, they could really hurt our party.

  • Hmmm, so maybe if the Dems win the Senate our very own Richard Shelby will switch back to the Dems, the same way he switched to the Repubs when they took over?
    Can’t wait;>

  • Sounds like they want to save their careers. I’m not so sure if I were a party chair if I’d allow a new convert to run. This could just be another way to shift the party further to right and squeeze the progressives out even more.

    Are we going to have to have hundreds or Lamonts in the next twenty years to try to take back the party? I hope not.

  • “Beware the Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing.”

    I’m wth you Steve. If I thought for a moment that said republicans had seen the error of their ways, and came to some true realization that Democratic policies are just plain better for the country, that some decent level of social welfare in fact raises all boats, that reining in corporations makes for a better society (and in the end might even be better for business itself), that regulations protecting the rights and safety of workers are a good thing, that our tort system, though imperfect, is the only recourse a citizen has against a negligent coporation, then sure, C’MON DOWN as Monty used to say. I welcome those kind of converts with open arms.

    But instead, I think it’s more likely they just think they’ll have a better shot of getting rid of social security and welfare and affirmative action and otherwise dismantling the remnants of the New Deal and everything else we’ve worked for over the last 100 years, if they jump from the sinking Titanic that is today’s republican party.

    Fuck ’em. Let em start their own third party if they don’t like what’s happening in their own. Why should we let them ruin ours? We got enough problems with our own liebermans.

  • Having watched (and even participated in back in 1968 and 1972) “principled lefty-ism” hand the country over to Nixon and ultimatetly to Boy George, “the ultimate revenge of Richard Nixon,” I am fine with anyone who wants to put a D behind their name and support basic party principles do anything they want. There is never going to be a “left” majority party in America and people who think they can purify the Democrats – or create something useful with the Greens – to accomplish that goal need brain transplants since the one they’ve got obviously doesn’t work.

    I’m not saying welcome to the Marshall Wittmans. I dropped his b.s. site from our blogs recommended sites six months ago, and you can bet the day his hero John McCain declares for the Presidency that we will have seen the last of Marshall (no loss there). The DLC and the rest of the corporate whores need to be confronted and the last thing we need is another Bill Clinton who’s too comfortable with “go along to get along,” but right now we are up against the greatest threat this country has ever seen to the continuance of the United States as a democratic constitutional republic, and it’s “all hands man your battle stations” as far as I am concerned.

    Hell, I’d even vote for Dianne Feinstein, who I have cordially disliked and opposed ever since her first election in 1969, if there was any threat to her re-election (did it in 1994, when Arrianna Stassinopoulos Huffington decided she wanted to be a Senate Wife) too. I mean, I even trust Arianna these days to be a Democrat (so long as I keep my eyes on her and count the silverware before letting her walk out the door).

    Right now, being “the big tent” for real is the best thing we can do. Things can get sorted out once we’ve cut out the cancer right next to the heart of our country.

  • If the Republicans think it’s a great trick to create a bill combining a minimum wage increase with the elimination of the estate tax, what would prevent them from filling the Democrat party with a mass of Trojan horse candidates that will take Dem campaign money, get elected and then vote for the Republican agenda?
    Sorry – I don’t trust them.

  • On the state level, Oklahoma state Sen. Nancy Riley, who just finished third in the Republican primary for lieutenant governor, announced that she is becoming a Democrat because the GOP has no room for moderates. Her move makes it less likely that the GOP will be able to take over the Oklahoma Senate as they’d hoped.

  • In Kansas these bozos are what the moderates are running from. Check the blogroll down the left. Christian Coalition, Heritage Foundation, Clown Hall, Freeperville, WorldNutDaily, Eagle Forum, Drudge, Intelligent Design Network. This is the Club for Growth wing of the party that’s wanting to purge Chafee in RI. Running away from these clowns is almost like doing a sanity check.

    Here’s Nancy Boyda on the issues Nancy is running as a Democrat in the Kansas 2nd in a rematch against Jim Ryun (corrupt house deal and sub-4 minute mile). It’s been a long time and a lot of miles, since I’ve been in the Kansas 2nd, but I’m pretty sure she’s one of the switchers.

    :::Healthcare
    * Healthcare is a basic human right.
    Veterans
    * Veterans Deserve Healthcare
    Medicare Rx
    * Our Seniors Deserve Better
    Children
    * Cuts to Programs for the Needy are Immoral
    Education
    * Restore Funding for Public Education and Higher Education
    Jobs/Economy
    * Raise the Minimum Wage :::

    So what do you think? Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing?

  • I think there are many people calling themselves Republican who have watched in horror as the neo-con agenda unfolded. If some politician wants to come to Jesus and change party affiliation bravo. Welcome home.

    The line that separates the parties has always been a little blurred, but these days it is much clearer. The American people are not as stupid and Karl Rove thinks and enough is enough. I have a number of friends and family members who have re-registered as a Democrat, and intend to vote that way. My brother for example, a Vietnam vet, voted for Bush, but is furious about this war. He feels betrayed and I doubt that he is the only one. I wonder how many politicians out there also feel betrayed? These neo-cons are not Republicans or conservatives, they are facists.

  • My husband wouldn’t vote for Webb (in the VA primary) because Webb’s a switch-hitter (twice), and therefore suspect. Me, I figure he’s electable, which is all to the good; let’s get first things first. It’s not as if the switchers are likely to get important committee appointments until they’ve proved their bona fides. In the meantime, they’re useful for achieving the “critical mass”, which is badly neded.

  • Maybe now some of those Dems who constantly harp(ed) on the “he’s really a Republican” when talking about Wes Clark will shut up.

  • Comments are closed.