Well, it is a pretty long book

The New York Times Sunday Magazine will run a cover feature Rick “Man on Dog” Santorum this week, which will offer all kinds of interesting thoughts and perspectives, including a quote from a former Senate aide who calls the senator “a Catholic missionary who happens to be in the Senate” and the fact that some of Santorum’s Hispanic constituents greet him as a “holy man.”

He is, however, a religious person who isn’t into reading long books. Even when the book is Santorum’s Holy Scripture.

“I’ve never read the Bible cover to cover; maybe I should have,” Santorum said.

Indeed, as Taegan Goddard noted, Santorum goes on to explain that he’s “not a reader of scripture” and instead “reads magazines and journals offering commentary on religion.”

To be fair, this is probably more common that a lot of people, even devout theists, would care to admit. For that matter, I strongly believe that whether Santorum reads his Bible or not is entirely his business.

I nevertheless find it a little odd that a senator, who frequently offers his religious perspective on political issues, has shaped his entire life, worldview, and governing philosophy on a book he hasn’t read.

It’s one thing to accept the idea that Scripture offers believers a guide on how best to lead one’s life. It’s another thing to accept that belief while relying on magazines to tell you what Scripture says.

Typical lazy and ignorant asshole.

  • As stated earlier/elsewhere … in his defense, Santorum is really, really dumb.

    Also, isn’t he just being a good party member? Do any of them read anything other than the current official talking points? None of them show any signs of independent thought. Or even any appreciation of rational thought. Or empirical facts.

  • Put it this way: Mother Teresa was truly a holy person in the finest sense of the word, and nobody ever saw her running for political office, did they?

    A politician with a theological bent is one who simply tries to use religion as another tool to achieve his or her political goals. The really heinous ones are those who try to make their constituents believe that they really believe in it themselves.

    There have been, are now, and probably always will be ordained clergy elected to public office. (The Rev. Phillip Berrigan comes to mind, for one, forgive me if I misspell his name). But most of them keep their political duties clearly separated from their religious beliefs, and we can all learn something from their clarity of vision.

  • It isn’t that suprising that Santorum hasn’t read the Bible cover to cover. As Catholics, bible reading generally isn’t part of mass. We have two readings by lay people and then a reading of the Gospel during mass and that is all the Bible reading. I personally went to CCD as opposed to Catholic school and instead of strict Bible reading, we focused more on the lessons of the Bible (i.e. good samaritan, prodigal son).
    That being said, for a self-righteous, judgemental bastard like Santorum to have not read it while trying to base public policy on it, its just a little ridiculous.

  • Santorum reads magazines about religion so he can come up with gems like this:

    Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.), who blamed the church’s sex abuse scandal partly on America’s liberal culture in a July 12 article for Catholic Online (www.catholic.org).
    “It is startling that those in the media and academia appear most disturbed by this aberrant behavior, since they have zealously promoted moral relativism by sanctioning ‘private’ moral matters such as alternative lifestyles. Priests, like all of us, are affected by culture. When the culture is sick, every element in it becomes infected. While it is no excuse for this scandal, it is no surprise that Boston, a seat of academic, political and cultural liberalism in America, lies at the center of the storm,” Santorum wrote.

    via: http://weblog.theviewfromthecore.com/2002_07/ind_000626.html

    Sorry, couldn’t find original. Let’s hope we get to watch Casey, who’s much more authentically Catholic, take him out next year.

  • Someone should tell ‘Man on Dog’ that the same bible chapter of pagan-origin (Leviticus) that declares homosexuality an abomination also states that eating shellfish, too, is an abomination. We must repent and ask ‘Man On Seafood Pasta’ to pray for us for our souls are in jeopardy!

  • that plays into the stereotype about us catholics, that we never read the bible.

  • Even though Santorum is an idiot, it is not Catholic tradition to read the bible or belong to bible study groups. The Scriptures that are important and that Catholics pay attention to are the Gospels and the Epistles. We learn about the old testatment stories in Catholic grade schools but we do not read them directly from the bible. Catholics are not fundamentalists (contrary to what passes for modern clergy and right-wing Catholic politicians). We are not encouraged to read the bible but scripture is interpreted (which we believed was inspired by God) for the message He is imparting to us. The clergy of old believed the bible in the hands of the uneducated laity was dangerous and they have a point considering what the fundamentalists do with it.

    I think Santorum must have been truant during religious instruction because he does not live the life of a Catholic. We do not speak about being Catholic, we hope people realize we are followers of Christ by our actions. Rarely do we say we are Christian, we say we are Catholic if asked. The totality of Catholicism is not opposition to abortion, but our belief in the sacredness of all life, the fight for social justice and working for peace. Dorothy Day was a great example of a real Catholic. There are a lot of us out there. We are appalled at people like Santorum, Scalia, the bishops who covered up the child abuse scandal, et.al. A Catholic should not be mean-spirited, disinterested in the welfare of others. The beatitudes were emphasized over and over again in school and in the sermon at Mass.

    Santorum, Scalia, and their Opus Dei ilk give Cathoics a bad name. This is a fringe extremist cult and for some reason, they are allowed to exist in the Church. I cannot figure this one out. I just want my Church back.

  • What nobody is saying is that this means that he’s getting double-indoctrination from the religious wingnuts. That is, they lobby for him, pay his bills etc. and it’s also where he turns for expertise on Christianity, and I’m sure it’s filled with political pabulum. Double barrels. If he were really reading the Bible he might notice some discrepancy between what he and his ilk are doing and what the Bible says he should be doing.

  • I’m a pretty radical agnostic, and I’ve read the whole thing cover to cover, including all of the begats. For Santorum to not have read the book on which he bases his entire life and politics is just pathetic.

    And yes, the current Pope is very support of Opus Dei from everything I’ve read. For example, this.

  • I was preparing to make a point about Catholicism but I see other got there first. Basically, “sola sciptura” is a protestant invention. Catholicism always accepted scripture as inspired, but the real Word of God is a person “Jesus the Christ”. Much of the development of doctine came from non-biblical sources, such as Greek philosophy (for example, “homoousias” at First Nicea). Basically, catholicism believes in a set of truths (“infallible teachings”) that the church protects. Some of these are biblical, some are not.

    To reiterate points made by others, I do not think Santorum is much of a catholic. Talk is cheap. His legislative history speaks otherwise. After all, the essence of Christianity is see Christ in the “least among us”. I don’t see much evidence of that in Santorum. Frankly, I’m sick of the media giving a free pass to these self-proclaimed christains who mock our faith. Let’s please take back our religion!

  • I skipped the begats, they’re boring.

    What troubles me is that these people just don’t seem very interested in the Gospels, and I don’t see how you can be a Christian without them.

  • If he read the Bible in the old Catholic Latin edition, with translation, he’d find out that “Santorum” is Latin for “asshole”.

    Actually, “Santorum” is a frothy mixture of blood, semen, feces, and lubricant. Reallly.

    I love that when I google “man on dog”, Santorum’s name comes up as the first hit. The man Google-bombed himself!

  • If more people like Santorum read the Gospels and took them seriously the nation and the world would be a much better place. In particular, they he should read and follow Mark 16:18:

    They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover.

    I suspect we could get a collection going to pay for the arsenic.

  • Put it this way: Mother Teresa was truly a holy person in the finest sense of the word, and nobody ever saw her running for political office, did they?

    Well, Mother Teresa is on my list of evil bastards, not holy people.

    The thing that keeps nagging at me about this is that journalists (journalists!) are operating from the assumption that of *course* people will base policy on the bible, and of *course* they should *read* it first before they impose it on the citizenry.

  • Re #17, I always enjoyed the scene in Alan Moore’s “V for Vendetta” that contains the line, “…when it reached his stomach, it was still cyanide.” Vicious for veritudinous.

  • …huh? I typed that?

    Change the last line to “Verily vicious” and move along. There’s nothing to see here.

  • Comments are closed.