We’ll ‘never’ see the McCains’ tax returns?

The Obamas released tax returns for both Barack and Michelle. The Clintons released returns for both Bill and Hillary. But when John McCain released his tax returns a few weeks ago, Cindy McCain’s tax documents will remain private.

It’s not too hard to understand why. The McCains are extraordinarily wealthy — one might even be tempted to call them “elites” — and Cindy McCain’s assets are estimated to be about $100 million, including a private jet, which her husband has been borrowing at a reduced rate.

Given the other candidates’ disclosures, and McCain’s own alleged commitment to transparency, will we ever see Cindy McCain’s returns? She was asked on the “Today” show this morning, and said, politely, “Never.”

I’ll tell you a little secret: at first blush, I’m not inclined to care. The McCains have more money than some countries, they haven’t been accused of any financial improprieties, and while it’s interesting when a guy like McCain opposes minimum-wage increases while flying around on his wife’s private jet, I’m not exactly itching to go through Cindy McCain’s tax returns. In fact, I’m not surprised that someone of her wealth would want to keep her returns free of scrutiny.

But this is absolutely relevant in this presidential campaign for a few reasons.

First, John McCain, for all of his talk about the importance of transparency and disclosure, has gone out of his way to ensure that all of his assets are in his wife’s name. And as Kevin recently noted, “There’s only one reason for a politician to make sure that all his assets are in his wife’s name: it’s to make sure that no one knows anything about his assets. It’s not as if McCain is the first pol to try this, after all. Is the press really going to let him get away with this?”

Which leads us to the second reason this matters: McCain has always relied on his wife’s wealth, and has always “mixed business and politics.” If the point of releasing tax returns is to offer voters a chance to get a better sense of the candidate, then it’s incumbent on the McCains to stop acting like they have something to hide.

And third, there’s just the shameless hypocrisy of it all. In 2004, the Republican National Committee spent quite a bit of time and energy demanding that the Kerry campaign release Teresa Heinz Kerry’s tax returns. The candidate’s wife resisted, but after pressure from the GOP and the media, she eventually gave in and made the materials publicly available.

The situation is exactly the same. John Kerry made less money than his wife, who inherited most of her fortune. McCain is practically broke, and relies on his wife’s millions, which were also inherited.

In other words, if we hold the McCains to the standards set by the Republican Party, they owe the public some additional information. The press hounded the Kerrys on this; we’ll see if the media chooses to give the McCains equal treatment. I’m not optimistic.

[The McCains] haven’t been accused of any financial improprieties

I dunno about that.

What about Keating Five? Cindy McCain had significant investments with Charles Keating, whose business John McCain did favors for in Congress. IIRC McCain defended himself on the grounds that his pre-nup meant that he had no access to his wife’s assets and therefore there was no conflict of interest. He was rebuked by the Ethics Committee (not that they did anything about it).

And what about the games McCain has been playing in apparently violating — of all laws — his own cherished McCain-Feingold? Does that count as a financial impropriety?

  • I watched this interview in it’s entirety and, not surprisingly, Ann Curry didn’t ask Cindy McCain about the Senator’s use of her company’s plane or any of the issues that CB mentioned above. Now, the traditional media is likely to take the position that the question was “asked and answered” and move on. Tough interview, huh?

    Frustrating (again).

  • “The press hounded the Kerrys on this; we’ll see if the media chooses to give the McCains equal treatment. I’m not optimistic.”

    I don’t think this is accurate. I think you have to edit it to read as follows: “The rightwing hounded the press to hound the Kerrys on this…”

    Which would mean the second part of the sentence should read: “We’ll see if the media chooses to react the same way to entreaties from the Democrats to give McCain equal treatment.”

    The last part was perfect and should remain unchanged: “I’m not optimistic.”

  • How fortunate for St. John McCain that being committed to straight talk does not constitute an unbearable burden.

  • Laura @ 2, you’re close with your theory. But what people will really think is not “well the question was asked and answered, time to move on.” They’ll think “If the question is worth asking, it would’ve been asked. Therefore, since no one in the media asks the McCains about it, it must not be important, so why should *WE* worry about it?

  • Steve, you should not say John McCain is practically broke. He made 500,000 plus thousand dollars last year. He lives high on the hog in his wife’s(perhaps jointly owned) houses and condos. Flying around in her private corporate jet. A loophole in McCain Feingold that applies to how many people? He hides all his wealth behind his wifes skirt.

  • How can someone, Steve Benen for example, make the case that the McCain’s are quite similar to the Kerry’s of 4 years ago?

    Can we find all the quotes from the RNC and other republicans and put them in one place where the media, or other interested parties, find them?

    Who knows, maybe there is a legitimate reason to treat the McCain’s differently than the Kerry’s. I can’t think of one but that doesn’t mean a valid reason doesn’t exist.

  • Is the press really going to let him get away with this?

    I’m pretty sure they will. But the public knows the press sucks, so there’s hope.

  • “He’s just a gigolo and everywhere he goes, people know the part he’s playing”

  • The Clintons believe enough in Hillary’s run for nomination to loan her campaign their personal money.

    Not only does Cindy not beleive enough in ther husband’s run for the Presidency to loan him her money, McCain cried “poor little me” when his run for the nomination was on the rocks and took tax payer’s money.
    I would be less interested in how much money McCain married than in knowing who he will be beholding to, through his wife’s wealth.

    Assuming only these two choices, I would rather trust Billary than McCaindy.

  • Well that’s cool because now the chance that her short, balding, adultress senile gold digging husband will ever become POTUS is zero.

  • I wonder if a little digging will find quotes or videos of McCain advisers or allies, or even McCain himself saying the Kerrys must release the info… that would be easy enough for even Timmeh to understand.

  • I don’t really get the point of releasing tax returns. What business is it of ours?

    If we’re concerned about whether the candidates are involved in any financial improprieties, why don’t we require them to file financial statements with some CPA firm and have them audited? Why don’t we require the IRS to audit the tax returns of candidates to certain offices? What are we, the public, supposed to do with the returns? Go “tsk, tsk” if we see something we don’t like?

    If some kind of audited financial disclosure is considered appropriate for certain candidates or nominees for public office, fine. Come up with a standard and apply it uniformly across the board. But this tradition of releasing unaudited tax returns seems kind of silly.

    Just my opinion.

  • BuzzMon (#15),

    I “stole” those lyrics from the song “Just a Gigolo” which was recorded by a lot of different people. I prefer the version by Louis Prima circa 1956 although the David Lee Roth version was just as good.

  • I’m not sure how many times this has to be said, but, IOKIYAR.

    Honestly, you could be screwing a goat on tv during the late news and, IYAR, all is well.

  • Harper’s did a piece on the tax returns of the John and Cindy Mc Cain Foundation,a couple of months back. The returns covered 2000-2006. Almost all the money donated TO the foundation came FROM the McCains themselves,except $100.The money donated to charity by the foundation went to the elite private schools the McCain children attended-tax write off for the McCains.Im talking hundreds of thousands of $$- A lot to Naval Academy, and a whopping $250 to Child Crisis Center in Phoenix for abused children, an astonishing $500 to purchase “mistymates” for troops in Iraq and incredible $50 to Neighborhood Cancer Drive. Go to Harper’s and check it out(.Authored by Ken Silverstein.)

  • I agree, there can be a hughe conflict of interest when he gets in the Whitehouse. He can decide to only serve Bud and Bud light. That would be terrible for our worldy guests.

  • I’m sure the media wouldn’t have cared if the Clintons only released the income that Hillary made over the last 7 years and Bill kept his separate.

    Mmm-hmmm.

    In answer to the question, why release the tax returns? It isn’t required. It isn’t the law. But it is in the interest of greater governmental transparency being in the public interest. See, e.g. #20.

  • She’s one weird scary woman. It doesn’t exactly help his campaign (except with republicans). Compare her to Michelle

  • Comments are closed.