‘We’re still in the middle of the Katrina saga’

The AP noted this morning, “On the second anniversary of Hurricane Katrina, anger over the stalled rebuilding was palpable Wednesday throughout the city where the mourning for the dead and feeling of loss doesn’t seem to subside.”

How could anyone feel anything but anger? For all the rhetoric from the administration, exactly two years after Katrina ravaged New Orleans, “none of the 115 ‘critical priority projects’ identified by city officials” for publicly funded rebuilding efforts “has been completed.” Of the $34 billion “earmarked for long-term rebuilding,” less than half “has made its way through federal checks and balances to reach municipal projects.”

Bush’s presidency has had a series of turning points (coincidentally, they were all turns to the right), but Katrina was the point of no return. After the public soured on the war in Iraq and rejected Bush’s effort to privatize Social Security, Bush’s standing was weak and getting weaker by the summer of 2005. But the nation truly recoiled at the humiliating response to this natural disaster. It encapsulated so many of the president’s tragic flaws: the incompetence, the dishonesty, the willingness to put unqualified hacks in key positions of authority based solely on politics. It was as if the hurricane made landfall, and washed away the emperor’s clothes.

But this is not to just look back and marvel. The crisis began two years ago today, but it has not yet ended. Historian Douglas Brinkley had a powerful piece on the subject the other day, in which he described the “reckless abandonment” of New Orleans.

We’re still in the middle of the Katrina saga. Bold action has been needed for two years now, yet all that the White House has offered is an inadequate trickle of billion-dollar Band-aids and placebo directives. Too often in the United States we forget that “inaction” can be a policy initiative. Every day the White House must decide what not to do.

The stubborn inaction appears to fall under the paternalistic guise of helping the storm victims. Bush’s general attitude — a Catch-22 recipe if ever there was one — appears to be that only rank fools would return when the first line of hurricane defense are the levees that this administration so far refuses to fix. […]

Shortly after Katrina hit, former House speaker J. Dennis Hastert declared that a lot of New Orleans could be “bulldozed.” He was shot down by an outraged public and media, which deemed such remarks insensitive and callous. Two years have shown that Hastert may have articulated what appears to have become the White House’s de facto policy. He may have retreated, but the inaction remains.

Given this, re-reading Bush’s speech from Jackson Square, more than two weeks after the storm hit, is almost comically painful.

This video, from the Campaign for America’s Future’s Anne Thompson, hammers the point home perfectly:

Rumor has it that the president is not aware of his current predicament, and is thinking more and more about his “legacy.” I have a hint for Bush: history will not be kind.

It wasn’t (just) a turning point for Bush. Really it was a turning point for America. Until then we could be considered a modern, civilized society. Since then, such a thought is laughable. Modern, civilized societies maintain critical infrastructure. Modern, civilized societies rebuild rapidly and efficiently after disasters. Modern, civilized sociteies do not have internal refugee problems. Modern, civilized societies do not abandon entire cities out of pure miserliness, negligence, and fatigue.

  • And this failure to address a national embarassment isn’t solely President Bush’s alone.

    I don’t think any of the presidential candidates other than Barack Obama have addressed the failure to restore New Orleans.

    The primary responsibility, however, lies with the President. He made a series of promises in that speech and has yet to do anything about it. In addition, he’s requesting an additional $50 billion for the war in Iraq — I’m sure that some of that money could come in handy in restoring New Orleans, provided that there’s a reconstruction plan (of which there is none), under a single management czar (again, nobody is responsible), and a long-term strategic plan to deal with the flooding (again, the Army Corps doesn’t appear to be doing that).

    President Bush will be judged harshly by history and this is another example of his incompetence and mismanagement. So much for compassionate conservatism.

    Come to think of it, the failure to restore New Orleans is simply a surrender to global warming — something which Bush denies is happening. We’ll be building levees elsewhere throughout the United States as the century passes.

  • I was amused yesterday when John Edwards proposed something he calls “Brownie’s Law,” which would require that senior political appointees to be qualified for their positions.

    This is how far we have sunk under the Bush administration – that requiring nominees to be qualified for their jobs could be considered far-sighted reform.

  • Oh, praise Jesus and pass the tax cuts is not the recipe to a modern civilized society that maintains its infrastructure and educates its young in a global society.

  • But, but … what about all the freshly painted schools? Oh yeah, that’s Bush’s other complete and utter fiasco. It’s hard to keep straight which lies belong to which disaster anymore.

    If George Bush and the Republican Party wanted to create a government that would make America lose faith in government, they have suceeded. But I still remember when government did work well and I did have faith in it and I still see government working well on other levels. The lesson learned from the Bushies is that Republicanism and good governance are incompatible and it would be irresponsible to vote for a Republican candidate on any level.

  • Modern, civilized societies do not abandon entire cities out of pure miserliness, negligence, fatigue and RACISM.

    Fixed that for ya.

  • There are so many factors contributing to the the disastrous aftermath of Katrina that one hardly knows where to begin. And there, more than anywhere is where I think the feds have failed. What was needed was a comprehensive strategy,worked out with the states, to address the unprecedented scope of the disaster and the particular needs of the affected areas. Louisiana and Mississippl were among the most vulnerable states for a catastrophic event before Katrina. Add to that the fact that so much infrastructure was wiped out, particularly in NO, and you have a situation where state and local government can’t meet their normal obligations.

    Without a comprehensive, coordinated approach, we have a lot of well-intentioned but ineffective efforts whose sum is less than their parts. Makes one long for a wonky kind of guy at the helm rather a beer-drinking buddy.

  • This just irritates me to no end. I grew up in New Orleans, have friends and family who still live there, and left my job to go down on September 10, 2005 to volunteer in the Gulf Coast for three months after Katrina. I was not alone. Thousands of Firefighters, Army Corps of Engineers, Peace Corps, Red Cross, Nature Conservancy, even WalMart and PigglyWiggly volunteers did the same.

    To me, and call me simplistic, the most maddening thing is that it’s FIXABLE. What needs to be done is tangible and concrete and obvious. It’s not a goddamn game. It’s not a moral issue or a racial issue or a political issue. It isn’t so complicated it requires a think tank and 15 years of evaluation and research to determine a possible course of action. It’s a solution most 7-year-olds would figure out. Something is broken. Fix it.

    That our fearless leaders are so blatant and smug in their utter disregard for anything in the area (save oil) is sickening. And once again, embarrassing. It makes me wish more than ever that I was independently wealthy and could just handle it myself!

  • It’s too bad that Katrina had to happen in 2005 -and not 2004. Could have made all the difference.

  • Katrina was a disaster fifty years in the making, according to an ex-Green Beret Army Officer friend who told me the following story.

    From the late 1940s to the late ’60s, this friends great-uncle was a senior Army officer in the Army Corps of Engineers and was involved and in the latter part of his career, in charge of bolstering the levee system protecting New Orleans. He had more than fifteen years on the job there and was intimately involved in the construction, repair, and enlargement of the vast system enclosing the city and its suburbs.

    His great-uncle told my friend that as the years progressed, the city government of New Orleans became much more involved in contracting out and the bidding process for repairing the levees. The Democrats in charge of New Orleans began consistently lobbying for more control of this process and finally, over the protests of the professional military engineers, was able to have almost complete control over who got the contracts. The due diligence the Corps made after the repairs found more and more often that shoddy workmanship and materials were weakening the dykes, and reported this up their command chain to Washington [the military don’t run to newspapers like the Times-Picayune who often side with the Democratic politicians].

    After years of non-improvement of the process, the COE finally resigned itself to overseeing a politicized kickback and underperformance ritual with the levees. My friends uncle told him that sooner or later the “Big One” would knock over the levees. His uncle died before the “Big One” arrived in 2005.

    And when it happened, whose door did the MSM lay the broken levees and subsequent disaster in front of?

    The real culprits, which were the Democratic administrations Moon Landriau and his crooked relative Sen. Mary and their political ancestors and allies?

    Or a fake bogus made-up smear, which blamed the Republicans?

    Take one guess.

  • Actually, Dave@11, I remember hearing quite a bit about how levee failure was years in the making and that LA congressman (democrats included) were to blame.

    But, nice try.

  • After years of non-improvement of the process, the COE finally resigned itself to overseeing a politicized kickback and underperformance ritual with the levees.

    So, you’re saying the COE preferred advancement over honor? They would rather give in to unsatisfactory design and shoddy construction than fight against future distaster because demanding standards is just too much trouble? Quite an indictment of your friend’s uncle and those he served with.

  • Daveinboca #11, interesting story (and rationalization), but it is not supported by facts. Sounds like a very self-interested defense of the Corps of Engineers, similar to arguments made shortly after Katrina by the Corps (and Bush supporters looking to deflect blame) that have also been refuted. Internal and external investigations of the Corps regarding the levee failures found that the regional commanders in Mississippi disregarded any reports of design inadequacy, long before any democratic or republican politician could have gotten involved.

    Real quickly — the city government of New Orleans has NOTHING to do with the levees. The (now-disbanded) O.P. Levee Board did, and yes, its corruption has been documented elsewhere, but that board certainly had nothing to do with the design failures that are the root cause of the levee failures that drowned our city; that buck stopped at the Corps of Engineers.

    Also, you clearly are not a regular reader of the Times-Pic if you accuse it of always siding with Democratic politicians.

    Finally, Sen. Landrieu (D) is a paragon of virtue compared to Sen. Vitter (R).

    For a good summary of the challenges facing New Orleans today and the disingenuous claims of support made by the Bush Administration, see http://www.wwltv.com/local/stories/wwl082807jbmidura.7c998423.html.

  • Remember the Bushies total lack of response to the tsunami?
    The Bush team and the leadership of the Repcons are simply evil.
    They are heartless, selfish and cruel.

    Let’s face it they have no emotional or intellectual sense of other’s suffering, and they have no intention of learning.

    I want to take this moment to thank the Republican Party for cheating these people into high public office – 4 times.

  • Comments are closed.