What Fitzgerald wants

Raw Story, which seems to have better sourcing on the Plame story than most, is reporting that Patrick Fitzgerald already has his indictments in mind.

Special Prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald has asked the grand jury investigating the outing of CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson to indict Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby and Bush’s Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice, lawyers close to the investigation tell RAW STORY.

Fitzgerald has also asked the jury to indict Libby on a second charge: knowingly outing a covert operative, the lawyers said. They said the prosecutor believes that Libby violated a 1982 law that made it illegal to unmask an undercover CIA agent. […]

Two other officials, who are not employees in the White House, are also expected to face indictments, the lawyers said.

There’s one other point that seems odd today. Roll Call reported that Fitzgerald visited Rove’s attorney, Robert Luskin, at his DC office yesterday. Why, exactly, would he do that, especially if the plan is to indict Rove this week? Raw Story’s report fleshes that out too.

Those close to the investigation said Rove was offered a deal Tuesday to plead guilty to perjury for a reduced charge. Rove’s lawyer was told that Fitzgerald would drop an obstruction of justice charge if his client agreed not to contest allegations of perjury, they said.

Rove declined to plead guilty to the reduced charge, the sources said, indicating through his attorney Robert Luskin that he intended to fight the charges.


And why were FBI agents still talking to Plame’s neighbors this week about whether they knew about her status as an undercover CIA agent?

The lawyers said Fitzgerald needed more evidence to convince the grand jury that Plame was in fact an undercover agent. On Monday, he sent FBI agents to her residential neighborhood to obtain testimony from neighbors that they were unaware of Plame’s employment prior to her outing.

Evidence collected in these inquiries was aimed at convincing the jury that she was covert, the lawyers said.

I’m just passing on what I hear. I know you’re tired of reading the phrase, but “stay tuned.”

Two others? Bolton and Fleischer? Novak (pled to a lesser charge with cooperation) and Bolton?

Karl Rove to fight the charges. Well, Patrick Fitzgerald better get his resume together, ’cause you know good ol’ Turd Blossom isn’t going to fight the charges in court. He’s gonna fight them in the halls of the AEI, and the pages of the Washington Post. He’ll quit his job, hire a PR firm, 4 more lawyers and Frank Luntz to help him fight these charges.

The wreck is on!

  • I sure hope they’re wrong. We all
    wanted the House of Bush to go
    down.

    This is zip. And it sounds like
    case closed, too. Nothing
    beyond.

    A couple of aides go down, maybe.
    Long live the regime! What a
    disappointment.

  • There could be more than one strategy at work in Fitzgerald’s visit. One could be that he wasn’t quite sure how good his case against Rove is so he tried to get a quick mea culpa as opposed to a possible acquittal.

    Another could be that he’s totally confident that Karl is going down and offered a deal possibly to win Karl’s cooperation to go after someone else, perhaps Cheney.

    If it was Door #2, that may be why Karl turned it down. Or it could be that he’s confident enough that his attack machine will succeed once again as it has in the past of shielding him from the consequences of his actions.

    Let’s just get on with it, shall we? C’mon, Patrick, you’re killing us out here! 🙂

  • I figure Rove is being offered a deal. Maybe Fitzpatrick visited Luskin in his office because he suspects his phones are tapped. They probably are.

    Where is Bush in all this? My guess is that he genuinely doesn’t know many details of the Plame outing. Smearing opponents is SOP. And why would Rove or Cheney bother to tell the wartime president anything? Like everything else, they’d just have to explain it — and in verrrry simple terms.

    Yesterday, for instance, Bush described Fitzgerald’s investigation as “very serious.” Can’t you just imagine Bush asking Rove what the hell all the fuss is about, and Rove giving a deep sigh and saying, “There’s a very serious investigation going on.” And Bush asking, “Investigation of what?”

  • He could still have Cheney racked up as an “unindicted co-conspirator.”

    Also, there might be another charge in the offing–according to Richard Sale, Fitz wants to rack everyone indicted up for violating Joe Wilson’s civil rights as well. In Fitz’ view, Rove, Libby and friends used “U.S. government offices, buildings, personnel and funds” to violate Joe Wilson’s civil rights.

    Sale also says there WILL be indictments announced this afternoon, with a Fitz press conference tomorrow.

  • Rove made the wrong decision.

    But nothing new in that.

    Rove’s whole life has been wrong choices to moral decisions.

    We are beyond the “courts of public opinion” now.

    Even if you look at public opinion, they are all against Rove and the White House. Public opinion is over and off the tipping point cliff on this mess.

    .

  • Following Darrell’s comments, see
    Truthout/Perspective by Richard Sale,
    “Aides to Be Indicted, Probe to Continue”
    over at http://www.Truthout.org, (sorry forgot
    to drag the URL along), in which he
    says:

    ” The probe is far from being at an end. According to this reporter’s sources, Fitzgerald approached the judge in charge of the case and asked that a new grand jury be impaneled. The old grand jury, which has been sitting for two years, will expire on October 28. ”

    So if this pans out, there’s hope yet.

  • Comments are closed.