What happens if Rehnquist doesn’t step down?

It was expected Monday morning. The morning passed? OK, Monday afternoon. No? OK, Tuesday for sure. Um, Wednesday, no doubt. Maybe Thursday?

The political world keeps looking to Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist, whom we’re all sure is definitely going to retire, waiting for word that he’s stepping down. This was supposed to be the week we finally heard the news, the White House has already started interviewing possible replacements, senators are already putting together lists, the interest groups’ ads are ready to run — all we need now is that pesky little retirement announcement to be released.

Except it hasn’t happened.

The possible retirement of Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist has taken shape as a hulking storm front approaching this anxious city. It won’t rain. It won’t blow over. It’s just parked there. Rumbling.

An entire industry of activist groups is waiting to lurch into action should the ailing jurist decide to create the first Supreme Court vacancy in 11 years — as many experts had expected him to do Monday, when the high court issued its last rulings for the current session.

They all had game plans for what to do if Rehnquist announced his departure. But he didn’t, and now Washington is stuck in a heightened state of readiness. Vacation plans are in limbo. Kids have been plopped into camps. Million-dollar ad campaigns are stuck in their starting blocks.

And as if that weren’t exasperating enough, there’s a real possibility that it may not happen this year at all. Lyle Denniston, an experienced court watcher who writes for SCOTUSblog, said, “With every passing hour, it becomes clearer and clearer that nothing is going to happen.” Sean Rushton, director of the Committee for Justice and the man who is supposed to the lead the right’s fight to replace Rehnquist, added, “It makes no sense to announce at this late date. The groups that we’re working with are now moving on.”

OK, let’s assume, just for the sake of discussion, that Rehnquist throws everyone a curve ball and doesn’t step down. Then what happens?

My friend Ryan Oddey at That’s Another Fine Mess raised a very good point recently about the ever-changing political landscape and how it might affect Bush’s approach to filling a high court vacancy.

If Rehnquist decides to stick around for another year, President Bush may find an ever harder time when it comes to appointing future judges to the Supreme Court. If the current political climate stays the course, and things for Bush continue to get worse, it is likely the Democrats will pick up seats in Congress come 2006, and the gap between Democrats and Republicans in the Senate will shrink, with an outside chance of Dems regaining the majority.

Still, with fewer Republicans in the Senate, Bush will have a tougher time putting forth any radical judges, simply because the Dems will have more seats and require fewer Republican defections when it comes to voting down a nominee. If the Dems picked up more seats, the ability for the GOP to break a filibuster would become much harder in the event the Democratic leadership decides on that course of action.

This definitely sounds right to me. Bush and the GOP not only have been working under the assumption that Rehnquist will retire; they also need Rehnquist to step down while they have 55 seats in the Senate. If he retires next year after the next Supreme Court term, and Republicans aren’t able to rush through a confirmation vote before the end of the term, Congress will take up the vacancy in 2007. If Dems make gains in ’06, as many believe they will, the White House will find it increasingly difficult to ram a rigid ideologue down the Senate’s throat.

With a 55-45 chamber, Bush doesn’t mind picking a fight. With a 51-49 chamber, it might occur to him that it’s a fight he could lose.

The AP recently noted that some court watchers have said Rehnquist “looks better than he had been, is keeping a regular schedule and, maybe most important of all, still loves his work.” Don’t be surprised if the guy decides to stick around a while longer. The weeping sound you’ll hear will be coming from the West Wing.

Ya think maybe Rehnquist isnt too keen on the ideology of the current administration and he’s trying to hold on long enough for there to be more balance in the legislative branch?

  • Maybe Rehnquist is taking a lead from his fictional counterpart from TV hit show West Wing. Putting aside the conservative/liberal differences between the real and fictional, that Chief Justice only stepped down when he was assued that the president would only appoint a person of worth caliber.

    Perhaps Rehnquist is gasp questioning Cher 2BushII’s ability to do so?

  • Ya think maybe Rehnquist isnt too keen on the ideology of the current administration and he’s trying to hold on long enough for there to be more balance in the legislative branch?

    I think he hates Scalia and Thomas, and he’s willing to do what it takes to make sure he never has to hear the words “The Scalia Court.” He and fellow Arizonan O’Connor may be conservative, but they’ve got some dignity, and they don’t want to see the Court stacked with jackasses.

  • As a friend and I were sadly admitting we want Rehnquist to hold on because whatever follows will be worse, it occured to us the Sandra Day O’Connor was widely reported to be hanging on just long enough for Bush to win in 2000. Why hasn’t she retired? Could it be she, like Rehnquist, has seen what she has wrought and wants to stop it before it does anymore damage?

    Well, one has to have hope;>

  • Rehnquist is upset about the reports of his demise. Now he’s going to hold on as long as possible to screw the preznet.

  • REArance etc – gotta go with you on this. I have to wonder if he hasn’t been holding out because of the current climate within the GOP. All the profiles on him leave me with the feeling that he is not a conservative in the Bush & Co mold and that he is worried about the Court if those bozos start running it. I think he might be seriously worried about the stature of the Court and it’s position in the government if it became another arm of the new GOP. That doesn’t even touch what he feels on the partisan/rancourus speechifying the nomination of a new justice AND a new chief justice.

  • I think there’s an ego factor – nobody wants to share a news cycle with the big end of term case decisions that came down this week. I think there will be a retirement announcement after the Fourth – either next Tuesday or the following Monday.

  • Sorry, can’t help it – have to repost this from the June 21 comments:
    (Abridged – see http://www.rit.edu/~smo4215/monty.htm#Scene%202 for full text)
    MORTICIAN: Bring out your dead!
    [clang] Bring out your dead!
    CUSTOMER: Here’s one — nine pence.
    DEAD PERSON: I’m not dead!
    MORTICIAN: Here — he says he’s not dead!
    CUSTOMER: Yes, he is.
    DEAD PERSON: I’m not!
    MORTICIAN: He isn’t.
    CUSTOMER: Well, he will be soon, he’s very ill.
    DEAD PERSON: I’m getting better!
    MORTICIAN: Oh, I can’t take him like that — it’s against
    regulations.
    CUSTOMER: Well, can you hang around a couple of minutes? He
    won’t be long.
    MORTICIAN: Naaah, I got to go on to Robinson’s — they’ve lost
    nine today.
    CUSTOMER: Well, when is your next round?
    MORTICIAN: Thursday.
    DEAD PERSON: I think I’ll go for a walk.
    CUSTOMER: You’re not fooling anyone y’know. Look, isn’t there
    something you can do?
    DEAD PERSON: I feel happy… I feel happy.
    [whop]
    CUSTOMER: Ah, thanks very much.
    MORTICIAN: Not at all. See you on Thursday.
    CUSTOMER: Right.

  • One of the commenters at SCOTUSblog points out that the current nine justices become the longest-serving continuous group next March.

  • Some court-watchers also believe Rehnquist is trying to avoid the “Potter Stewart effect” — the rapid mental and physical decay that besets long-serving judges or senators once they retire. (Cf. Thurgood Marshall.) And serving on the high court isn’t terribly stressful these days. I believe the Rehnquist Court has one of the lowest case loads of all the postwar courts.

  • The mistake is in assuming that the Supreme Court is governed by political priorities. However, the Court has been designed to insulate itself from political priorities. Rehnquist, O’Connor, and the rest will leave when they dang well please, and not worry about what a mere President thinks about the whole affair.

    In addition, there’s this assumption that a President can influence the ideological balance of the court. Yeah, like Eisenhower did by appointing Earl Warren, and Ford did by appointing John Paul Stevens.

  • I think most Supremes are, just as they damn well should be, really deeply embarrassed by how much their involvement in the 2000 election has cast them as the political, biased court. Probably only two of them aren’t embarrassed at all…

    So I wouldn’t be surprised if Rehnquist is willing to die with his robe on, just so he doesn’t have to accede to the desire of Bush to pack the Court. But can Rehnquist hang on until 2008?

    Probably not. What is he expecting, the impeachment of this administration? Wouldn’t surprise me. Respectable legal eagles see grounds for impeachment. See Elizabeth Holtzman’s article in the 7/28 Nation. Maybe Rehnquist believes he sees a solution along those lines.

    And if that’s not what’s holding him back, I go with Andy’s theory. Ego.

  • If Rehnquist does elect to stay on for another year, or at least, tries to, it increase the probability that retirements will stack up. Stevens, O’Connor and Ginsburg all seem at least fairly probable to leave the court before January 20, 2008.

  • i think too many uneducated people in the bushie world hear cancer and think death. i know the media has this idea—they are really uneducated. thyroid cancer is not a killer if caught early and i am sure rehnquist has the best medical insurance and the cancer caught early. this is easily curable.

  • Willie Rehnquist, Chief Monkeywrench screwed tight on Karl Rove’s oinky little nose. Make him talk funny Bill. Hang in there.

  • I thought Rehnquist just wanted to hold on till he earns the title of the longest sitting Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. He’s just a few months away from that, I think.

  • I would prefer that the CJ step down now. I can just see Bush/Rove making an inflamatory choice this time next year that gets shot down, motivating the base in time to save the Republicans bacon in the midterms. The fight would push Iraq, SS, and Delay out of the news.

  • Could it be that Rehnquist is afraid of what GWB will do?
    Do you think he might try to outlast the loonies who control he Republican Party?
    I don’t agree with his philosophy but he does seem to care deeply about the law. I doubt that anybody that the GWB group nominates will put law before dogma.
    Is Rehnquist going to be the hero who saves America?

  • John Dillinger –

    You need to look at the list of 5-4 decisions handed down that could (and probably would) be reversed if BushCo can stack the deck any higher. Their work stacking the Circuit seats has made any challenge cases a snap to push up the chain.

    Roe v. Wade is just one of many. . .

    This has been the James Dobson crowd’s goal from the get-go. Presidents come and go, but radical changes in the decisions of the SCOTUS tend to last.

  • Comments are closed.