What has the GOP done for you lately?

This week, asked to mention some of the recent success stories of his [tag]Republican[/tag] colleagues, former House Majority Leader [tag]Dick Armey[/tag] (R-Texas) said, “I’m not sure what this [tag]Congress[/tag] has [tag]accomplished[/tag].” He’s not the only one; no one else can think of lawmakers’ accomplishments either — including the [tag]GOP[/tag] leadership.

In an election year, when one party controls every branch of government and the public is anxious for signs of progress, being labeled, accurately, as a Do-Nothing Congress is problematic. But an article in today’s Roll Call suggests Bill Frist has a plan: look back at previous victories. Way back.

Senate Majority Leader [tag]Bill Frist[/tag] (R-Tenn.) and other GOP leaders are developing a new political offensive for September and October that will spotlight the GOP’s [tag]accomplishments[/tag] since the Republicans took control of Congress in 1994, [tag]Senate[/tag] aides said.

A GOP aide familiar with the effort explained that since Democrats have been successful in making this election “a choice between us and them” in a broad sense, Frist hopes to use that to the GOP’s advantage by highlighting changes to welfare, tax cuts and the economic boom over the period.

“The one constant over the last 12 years has been that we’re in charge,” the aide said.

That’s largely true, but it’s also the problem. When it’s time to write up the list of meaningful accomplishments, and it’s a very short list, Republicans have no one to blame but themselves.

But the truly entertaining angle to this strategy is the emphasis on accomplishments that “predate President Bush’s tenure.” As Roll Call explained, “[I]n the coming months Senate Republicans can be expected to tout issues such as the 1996 welfare reform bill and the economic successes of the mid-to-late 1990s.”

You know, maybe Republicans decided being in the [tag]majority[/tag] isn’t so great after all.

This strategy couldn’t make any less sense. For one thing, Republicans suddenly seem anxious to tell voters: “Vote GOP, because Clinton got us to do some stuff you liked 10 years ago.” This only helps highlight the fact that Republicans haven’t been able to govern effectively since.

The strategy immediately raises the obvious what-have-you-done-for-me-lately question. If you’re drawing up a list of success stories, and you need to go back to 1996, you might as well give up.

And perhaps best of all, this strategy helps Democratic efforts to nationalize the elections even more. Frist’s we-were-effective-once tack puts all the Republicans together at a time when the GOP is unpopular and trails Dems badly in generic-ballot polling.

Far be it for me to give the GOP advice, but if we’re really, really lucky, they’ll pursue this strategy enthusiastically. It’s easy to believe that voters will be impressed by decade-old legislation, right?

What have they done for us lately?

As of this moment:

The War in Iraq Cost: $295 billion.

Hey, I hear they’ve painted a lot of schools in Iraq.
A whole lot.

And I bet that paint won’t peel away either.
I bet it is good paint.
Real good paint.

  • In the west, a good number of states are proud of their “citizen legislatures” that only meet for part of the year or in some states meet every other year. The pride comes from the fact that the less time they spend legislating, the less “harm” they can do. To some, a do-nothing Congress ain’t half bad. The advantage for the Dems will come if the public comes to the polls convinced things needed to be done (healthcare, minimum wage increase, executive branch oversight) and to recognize that what this past Congress did try to do (Terri Schiavo, flag burning, gay marriage bans) were not in their best interest. Instead of a do-nothing Congress, I’d call it a maliciously neglectfull Congress

  • I’m still not so sure the American people aren’t dumb enough to fall for it — so few get their news from a diversity of sources, so they’ll just swallow whatever they see on the networks as gospel truth.

    I guess we’ll find out in November …

  • “Frist hopes to use that to the GOP’s advantage by highlighting changes to welfare, tax cuts and the economic boom over the period.” – Roll Call

    This guy has GOT to get out more. I suppose his golfing buddies all tell him the economy is booming. Frankly, the rest of America is not so sure. Consider the fact that native born men of working age have increased by 2.3 MILLION over the last five years, but they have not gotten ONE MORE JOB. All the job growth over the Boy George II administration has gone to American women or IMMIGRANTS.

  • There’s still a sizeable percentage that doesn’t know that the Republicans control both houses. Democrats need to mention this obvious fact early and often, because it makes the Republican BS look pretty lame. Without this basic information, the idiots can and do make some really stupid decisions.

    It’s like the “connection” between Saddam and 9/11, once a person sees it as real, all kinds of things make sense that are completely insane.

  • CB: “It’s easy to believe that voters will be impressed by decade-old legislation, right?”

    You never know… For one thing, such propaganda isn’t going to stress *when* it happened; just that it did happen. Which, of course, will be the truth, if not the whole truth. But people with little interest in day-to-day workings of the Congress will asssume it happened recently — just hadn’t been reflected in their lives yet.

    For another thing, a lot of the die-hard base doesn’t reason; it trusts. Maybe not always the politician, but it trusts its own “gut feelings”.The idea that “buyer beware” should be applied to politics never enters their minds.

    I think that’s what GOP is counting on is that the cart will be driven by those two horses: ignorance and trust. As long as those horses are showily dressed, it might even work.

    I needed to get some sugar today and looked at the shelf which holds two of the cheaper brands. One of the brands was on sale — for $1.99. The other was at its regular price: $2.29. The sale brand, however, is a 4lb bag, while the non-sale is 5lbs. The per-unit breakdown is plainly written (if in smaller print than the total): the on-sale brand is 49.8 cents per pound; the non-sale is 45.8. Nevertheless, it’s the on-sale brand that’s almost cleared out …

    As my husband says: republicans do not read labels, especially not the small print.

  • Comments are closed.