What to watch for tomorrow

After a lengthy break, DC’s political world begins anew tomorrow when Congress goes back into session. What’s on the agenda? Believe it or not, a vote in the Senate on repealing the estate tax.

Over the weekend, Rep. Mark Foley (R-Fla), a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, asked, “How do you do tax cuts when your budget is straining to save lives?” It’s a fair question, but Foley’s fellow Republican lawmakers don’t seem to share his concerns.

Members of the Senate Finance Committee were notifed on Friday and Saturday that Bill Frist is planning to go ahead with a vote on the estate tax tomorrow. Harry Reid’s office emailed a statement that summarized the problem nicely.

“I am surprised at the Republican leadership’s insensitivity toward the events of the last week. With thousands presumed dead after Hurricane Katrina and families uprooted all along the Gulf Coast, giving tax breaks to millionaires should be the last thing on the Senate’s agenda. I understand that the Senate shouldn’t grind to a halt as a result of Hurricane Katrina, but there are issues that are of much greater importance both to the people directly affected by the hurricane as well as the nation as a whole than estate tax repeal.

“This shouldn’t even be a choice. Families have been torn apart and homes have been washed away in four states. These victims deserve the Senate’s time, not the handful of millionaires repealing the Estate Tax will affect. I once again urge Senator Frist to reconsider his decision.”

We’ll see if Frist can be persuaded, but when his office started calling Senate Finance Committee members, the devastation on the Gulf Coast was already clear — and he didn’t care. There are some mutli-millionaires out there and they need Congress’ help.

The irony is, Republicans have been hoping to put Senate Dems in a tough spot over a repeal of the estate tax. By holding the vote tomorrow, those same Republicans are making it easier for Dems to reject the effort. Indeed, they’re handing Dems a salient political cudgel.

Instead of running from this vote, or feeling embarrassed about voting against yet another tax cut for the very wealthy, Dems should be chomping at the bit on this one. The Gulf Coast has been ravaged, New Orleans is on fire, more Americans are displaced as a result of the devastation than at any time since the Civil War, the relief and rebuilding effort will take billions … and the very first thing Senate Republicans want to do upon returning to work is cut taxes for millionaires and billionaires.

Better yet, as Think Progress noted, the repeal will undercut the very institutions so many are relying on desperately right now: America’s charities.

One stands in awe of Sen. Frist’s timing. Permanently repealing the estate tax would be a major blow to the nation’s charities. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has “found that the estate tax encourages wealthy individuals to donate considerably more to charity, since estate tax liability is reduced through donations made both during life and at death.” If there were no estate tax in 2000, for example, “charitable donations would have been between $13 billion to $25 billion lower than they actually were.”

As they did after 9/11 and during the lead-up to the Iraq war, conservatives have placed tax cuts for the most wealthy and well-off over the spirit of shared national sacrifice. What a stark contrast to the outpouring of generosity being shown by the American people in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.

I realize a vote against a tax cut is generally not a political winner, but this one’s easy. The question now isn’t whether Dems will go along with this nonsense, but rather whether Senate Republicans are insane enough to go along with this nonsense. Reports today suggest at least one high-profile Republican sees the writing on the wall.

Sen. Charles Grassley (R – Iowa), Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, has stated that there is virtually no chance that the Senate will back a full repeal of the estate tax when the chamber reconvenes to address the issue once again after the summer recess. […]

“I would imagine we have 55 or 56 votes to repeal it, but it’s not going to get done,” commented Grassley, who went on to add that the chances of a permanent repeal of the tax are “zero”.

All things considered, Dems might as well hope Frist does bring this to the floor tomorrow.

And one more thing, the feds just lost tax base from THREE different states. So revenue will tank even without the estate tax being repealed.

This is so loony and poorly timed, I’m wondering if this is nothing more than a “wedge issue” for Republicans, so the WH can see who its GOP friends are and who can’t be counted on when the going gets rough (and therefore ripe for purging).

  • After the release of the ABC poll I’m sure the
    Republicans expressed an enormous sigh
    of relief. They have weathered the storm,
    pardon the pun.

    I’ve noticed a change in the tone of coverage
    from the cable news networks. Gone is the
    harshness from last week. CNN is giving
    the Bush visit plenty of positive coverage.
    The emphasis is on the progress that’s
    being made, and the immense amount of
    work left to do. I don’t see much in the
    blame game, and I think they’ve already
    decided that it should be shared equally
    among the state, local and federal govenrments.
    Bush will be shielded. It’s already happening.

    As I write, Bush is getting a rousing reception.
    CNN is spending more and more time
    interviewing federal officials, who are of course
    spinning this thing for all they’re worth in
    their favor.

    So why not the estate tax? The political crisis
    appears to be past, and waning fast.

    What have Clinton, Biden, Kerry and Dean
    had to say about Bush’s response? I haven’t
    heard a word. And what are they saying
    about the estate tax? I haven’t heard anything
    there, either. Needless to say, CNN is not
    covering the estate tax.

  • Here’s another cudgel the Dems could use: http://www.mydd.com/story/2005/9/5/10953/36451#readmore

    In other words, we need to start planning yesterday for the economic disaster that will follow the loss of New Orleans. The loss of the major port on the Mississippi is going to clobber agriculture in the heartland; if food is going to get anywhere, it’ll have to be on trucks and gas prices have already been shocked and likely won’t react well to the increased demand. And, at least in the central US, it’s going to cost a lot more for imports to get there.

    But, nooooooo. Hardly anyone’s even thinking about this. The GOP would rather do these little pet projects and protect itself rather than protect our country from what’s coming. And the Democrats haven’t even gotten out of bed.

  • these republicans are an absolute embarrassment to america. 74% of them approve of bush’s handling of the worst disaster in american history. so why should he care if a bunch of, in his mind, poor nigger democrats die? those who voted for him don’t.

    why can’t a good republican city be destroyed? oh, i forgot. there’s no such thing. they tend to live apart from people so they can cultivate their ignorance in isolation.

  • This batch of republicans are crook’s. But we know where they stand. Where are our democratic leaders? A good question indeed. There seem’s to be very little difference between them and the thugs.
    How long until we are bankrupt as a country? It won’t take this administration much longer to destroy everything. What will be left? The very rich and the slaves.
    Howard Dean start screaming about this shit now. At least it appears you have some heart left.

  • Don’t forget — Frist is a mutli-multi-millionaire and I’m sure others in his family are as well. Whether they’re rich enough to be affected by the estate tax, however … hell yes they are. You can’t take it with you but you can make sure others have nothing before they go. That’s the thinking I guess.

  • Tip O’Neil once said of Reagan: “The evil is in the White House at the present time, and that evil is a man who has no care and no concern for the working class of America and the future generations of America, and who likes to ride a horse. He’s cold. He’s mean. He’s got ice water for blood.”

    Imagine if we had Democrats with spine now. Instead of being “surprised at Republican leadership insensitivity” he would have lambasted Republicans in general for their greed and cold bloodedness.

  • I think we should build a shrine to the genius of Bush in the flooded
    ruins of New Orleans, perhaps on Canal Street or next to the
    Superdome. And in letters 12 feet high in gold leaf should be inscribed the words SI REQUIRIS MONUMENTUM CIRCUMSPICE
    ( If you require a monument, look around you.)
    (With apologies to Aldous Huxley) Either that or a giant butthole.

  • I think (hope!) the truth is finally out of the bag on this administration and the repugs: that they don’t care for or about average Americans, that they can’t protect us. I don’t care if the MSM is spinning back to bush, it’s too late. We’ve still got Fitzpatrick going after Rove and Libby. That’s more damage. And a majority agree with Cindy Sheehan on the war. The admin. is still in deep doodoo.

    BTW, read Keith Olbermann’s latest.

  • Comments are closed.