What’s to be done with this Nazi church?

Guest Post by Morbo

Leaders of the Lutheran Church in Germany have an unusual problem on their hands: They don’t known what to do with a church full of Nazi imagery.

As Religion News Service explained recently, Berlin’s Martin Luther Memorial Church definitely has some odd features.

From the outside, it’s an ordinary church with a bell tower in need of renovation. The inside seems standard at first, until one takes a closer look at the elevated lectern. Carved into the wood is a sermonizing Jesus Christ; in the crowd gathered around him are a Nazi soldier and one of Adolf Hitler’s infamous brown-shirted storm troopers.

Planned in the 1920s but completed in 1935, the church is a bizarre blend of the Protestant faith and National Socialist dogma. A carved soldier decorates the baptismal font. Tiles on the wall include Nazi symbols. The spot now occupied by a bust of Martin Luther once was filled by a bust of Hitler. Even the Christ figure on the altar’s cross is strong, athletic and defiant, embodying the Nazi concept of the Ubermensch more than the traditional Jesus surrendering himself.

Other Nazis symbols were removed after the war, but amazingly, the church was used for services until about two years ago. Now in poor shape and in need of extensive repairs, the facility has been decommissioned by the Lutheran Church. Normally a building like this would just be demolished, but church leaders fear that would lead to accusations that they are trying to cover up part of their history.

That history is not good. Nazi leaders found ways to blend Lutheran ideas with their repugnant political philosophy. Despite his important role in the religious history of the West, Luther was, unfortunately, an anti-Semite. His writings blasting the Jews played right into Nazi hands. A historian who has studied the church notes that some members were only too happy to ingratiate themselves with the Nazis.

What should happen to this church?

There is a proposal on the table to turn it into a museum, and I hope that’s what happens. Stop using the church for worship and turn it over to the government, which should pay for the necessary structural repairs. The facility can be a memorial as well. It would offer powerful lessons to visitors.

Several concentration camps were preserved so that future generations would never forget what happened there. Historians will always keep the memory of the Holocaust alive through their writings long after the last survivor is dead — but we need more than that. We need to see the gates of the camps, we need to see the squalid buildings and the death chambers (even if some of them are replicas, which they are in some cases). We need to be able to touch these things and at least try to imagine what it must have been like to be warehoused in a place of such unspeakable horror. We need professional historians to run these sites and provide the necessary context for what occurred in them.

Historians should also take over this church. We know that during the Nazis’ rule, some religious leaders bravely resisted and even saved those marked for deaths. Others acted as sycophants and gave their churches over to the service of the regime. This is reality and it must be faced square on.

Keep the Nazi church open. Germany should also consider passing a new law: Before ordination, every pastor in the country should be required to visit it to learn what happens when religion gets too bound up with grotesque political ideologies.

I agree, it should be left as is to be a reminder to all what power can do to religion and what religion can do to power. Also should be a reminder to religionists of ALL stripes that being a religionist is not an automatic “Good Guy” Pass to do whatever the hell they want (as many folks are want to do.)

  • It should definitely be turned into a museum to counter all this “Darwin created the atheist Nazis nonsense” that’s running around these days – totally devoted to the entire history of Hitler, the Nazis and the Protestant church in Germany…thekeez

  • The swastika is an ancient symbol, found in many cultures, apparently deriving from the four wind directions. It figures prominently in Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism.

    Here’s what David Meier wrote about it in Hitler’s Rise to Power:

    There was an old Catholic Benedictine monastery in the town. The ancient monastery was decorated with carved stones and woodwork that included several swastikas. Adolf attended school there and saw them every day. They had been put there in the 1800’s by the ruling Abbot as a pun or play on words. His name essentially sounded like the German word for swastika, Hakenkreuz.

    Young Hitler did well in the monastery school and also took part in the boys’ choir. He was said to have had a fine singing voice. Years later Hitler would say the solemn pageantry of the high mass and other Catholic ceremonies was quite intoxicating and left a very deep impression. As a young boy he idolized the priests and for two years seriously considered becoming a priest himself. He especially admired the Abbot in charge, who ruled his black-robbed monks with supreme authority. At home Hitler sometimes played priest and even included long sermons.

    Hitler was an altar boy in that abbey church and sang in its choir (he even flirted briefly with the idea of becoming a Benedictine monk). It was probably Hitler’s first exposure to the swastika. I hate efforts to re-write history. Leave that to the GOP (e.g., Reagan’s “contribution” to our nation).

  • Museum, definetly. I’m guessing this church preceeds the Nazi’s Ayran as God religion which might make it unique. Also, it would be nice if there were docents to point out the intense stupidity of being anti-Semetic and worshipping Jesus Christ. It could serve as a warning to beware the illogical arsewipe.

  • The building should be preserved, and part of that preservation ought to include something along the lines of a Christian message.

    Hitler and his thugs are responsible for this ecumenical travesty, to be sure—but even so, there’s a powerful message that can counter the hate. The Nazarene Carpenter would have gone where he was needed most; where the Spirits of Men were at their weakest, and in the era of Hitler, the greatest need for the messages of that Carpenter would, in his POV, have been amongst those same soldiers who stand near him in that church.

    Jesus never preached anti-semitism; he never tacitly supported the goals of the Reich. If he could help a Roman Centurion and openly renounce the religious status-quo of the Pharisees, then I suppose he could talk to a couple of Herr Hitler’s soldiers. The Nazi message was that Jesus was preaching the Nazi message. He tried to twist the very purpose of Jesus—and he failed miserably in the attempt.

    Hitler took many good things and twisted them. Preserving this building would be both a way of reminding the world of what he did—and of likewise reminding the world that the things he twisted can be “untwisted….”

  • The swastika is an ancient symbol, found in many cultures, apparently deriving from the four wind directions. It figures prominently in Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism. — Ed Stephan

    We were taught in school (in Poland) that the ancient swastikas and Hitler’s one “turned” in opposite directions. Can’t remember if that’s true, since my sense of left-right is very poor.

  • I agree with Mark. Government using churches to further their aims is as old as man. Looking at the repressive tactics used by the neo-cons running our nation is another reminder of the fact there is nothing new under the sun.

  • I’m with #8 on this.

    I’ve seen the swastika’s from India, on paintings and carvings of various gods and goddesses, and they were indeed facing the opposite way from the Nazi ones.

    Also, I was told that the Ayrans were people from around India and central Asia– and were in no way blonde, tall, blue-eyed, or square-jawed, they looked like Indians, Pakistani’s, and Afghanis.

  • Very fitting I think: “God is the inner principle of all movement, the only identity which already fulfils and illuminates the universe. Everything is incorporated in this one principle, because it encloses infinity, it includes everything, and there is nothing that could be outside of it. ” Giordano Bruno

  • Comments are closed.