When in doubt, schedule an alternative-fuel photo-op

The president doesn’t seem to have much of a policy agenda anymore, so he’s apparently stuck looking at alternative-fuel cars all the time.

An imperiled attorney general, an unpopular war, a hung-over housing market and a presidential approval level of 32 percent: White House officials took all that into consideration and made their decision.

They would have President Bush do another event promoting cellulosic ethanol.

“Most of our ethanol is made from corn,” the commander in chief announced yesterday morning, posing in the White House driveway with three “flex-fuel” cars. “But the federal government is spending a lot of money to try to develop new technologies that will mean that ethanol could be made from wood chips or switch grass.”

It was another milepost in the shriveling of a presidency. What began as “with us or against us” now must share time with “wood chips or switch grass.”

“Shriveling,” indeed. I didn’t realize this, but apparently Bush has done six alternative-fuel events over the last year — and a seventh comes this morning when he inspects newfangled Postal Service vehicles. On average, that means the president is hosting a photo-op on alternative-fuel vehicles about once every seven weeks.

Part of me is kind of impressed. Bush used to mock hybrid vehicles on the campaign trail, but now he seems to habitually appear at staged campaign-like appearances in front of a hydrogen-powered car. I suppose this is progress.

But I can’t help but wonder if he’s decided this is the only safe thing he can do right now.

Bush doesn’t want to talk about the war. He doesn’t want to talk about the economy. He can’t take his State of the Union message on the road, because his State of the Union didn’t really include a message.

So we’re left with all “flex-fuel” cars, all the time. Reporters who cover the president’s every move have stopped showing up for public events.

Only half a dozen members of the White House press corps bothered to attend Bush’s event in the driveway yesterday — and they had come to ask about Alberto Gonzales’s diminished life expectancy as attorney general because of the prosecutor firings.

“What do you say about support for Gonzales falling?” CNN’s Ed Henry shouted when Bush finished his flex-fuel pitch. Another reporter shouted out a similar Gonzales question. Henry repeated his question. The president only smiled and waved, as though the reporters had complimented his suit.

If Bush wants to avoid the lame-duck label, shouldn’t he, you know, do something? Assuming, that is, he actually knows?

Doesn’t this sort of also direct attention to the great strides Bush has made regarding the environment and combating global warming?

  • it seems to me that he only became interested in alternative fueled vehicles when the american manufacturers started making them, and generally ignored them when they were manufactured by foreign auto makers.

  • If wood chips were the original fuel source, the country would be deforested by now. Every tree in the country would be 3 feet tall. It’s not easy being green is it Bush?

  • In five minutes Bush could excel over all the alternate fuels progress so far, by saying “The top speed limit is now 55 mph on interstates.” It would also save several times the number who died in 911 and the Iraq war every year.

  • Bush could excel over all the alternate fuels progress so far, by saying “The top speed limit is now 55 mph on interstates.”

    Comment by Dale

    Ummm . .

    “As an emergency response to the 1973 oil crisis, the U.S. Congress and President Nixon imposed a nationwide 55 mph (88 km/h) speed limit in 1974 . . . ”

    I’m willing to bet the Republicans don’t exactly want ANOTHER Nixonian parallel floating around out there.

  • The photo-op president lives. Maybe he should put his flightsuit back on.

    FYI the Jeep Cherokee on the whitehouse lawn was filled with B5 (5% biodiesel).

    Big Fat Whup.

    I can run my car on 100% biodiesel every day its over 40 deg F, and it’s a 2002 VW.

    Flex-fuel vehicles are a huge loophole for the automakers, a loophole which actually causes national fuel use to increase. By making flex-fuel cars, they get to skew their CAFE numbers, even though E85 isn’t available, and even if it was, it wouldn’t make economic sense to burn it because MPGs drop a LOT when you use it.

    We could do a lot better than what Bush is pushing, I know you’re all shocked.

  • Maybe he can find a way to make ethanol out of all the brush he clears from his land in Crawford.

  • Dale, you must be an east coaster. Go spend a week in rural Nevada, then come talk to us about the “good sense” in national 55 mph speed limits.

  • quatrain gleam in #10. imho, 55 mph doesn’t even make “good sense” here in rural vt, which is much smaller.

  • I’m in SoCal #10 where the speed limit is often 0 on the freeways. I can see some exception for big western states, but it’s all relative too. Who says 55 is slow or fast. If cars were only able to go 55 you’d think you were really moving. 🙂

    And where in Nevada does anyone need to be 30 minutes sooner. 🙂

  • Far be it from me to defend George W. Bush, but alternative fuel and technology is “happening science.” Link here: http://www.greencarcongress.com/

    Just as a broken clock is right twice a day, it’s an easy and the right thing for Bush to do these alternative energy photo-ops. But Bush is still Bush.

  • “Flex-fuel.”

    The technology to produce fuel from switchgrass on an economic scale is a good many years away—as is that needed for woodchip-based fuels. Both are nothing more than a smoke-and-mirrors scam to feed untold billions into the pockets of a few startups owned by the petro-industry. The only viable technology right now is corn-based fuel—but there’s a problem in that camp, as well: There’s not enough corn to supply the refining-plants that are running now.

    There’s a plant near Dayton, Ohio that’s getting corn as far away as Iowa, and they’re taking everything they can get from western Ohio and most of Pennsylvania. Now there’s a bunch over in western Pennsylvania who want to build a similar plant in Crawford County, somewhere around Meadville. Where do you suppose these guys are planning to get THEIR corn?

    Western Ohio, northern Indiana, and as far away as Iowa.

    Two plants—each gearing up to manufacutre about a million gallons of this “stuff” per year—and they’re both planning to use the exact same supply of corn.

    Question—what happens, when two companies have to go up against each other for the exact same fixed supply of material? And what happens to the farmers who need that corn for their livestock, or the cereal companies who need it for their products, or the grocery stores, or the polymer manufacturing facilities, or the millions overseas who manage to get something to eat once in a while, because of those great big bags of corn labelled “United Nations Humanitarian Relief?”

    All because some doofus wants to park a fat SUV on the WH lawn….

  • Now there’s a bunch over in western Pennsylvania who want to build a similar plant in Crawford County, somewhere around Meadville. Where do you suppose these guys are planning to get THEIR corn?

    Western Ohio, northern Indiana, and as far away as Iowa.

    [Steve]

    Interesting. At least one little town in N. Indiana is wrangling over the location of their own ethanol plant. I think the choices are:

    1. Right on the train tracks in the middle of this field of corn very close to town.

    2. Further from the town (and train tracks) in the middle of this other field of corn.

    Will Warsaw, IN be wracked by Corn Wars?

    The corn we eat isn’t the same as what livestock eats and I suspect ethanol corn will be a third type of plant, but here’s another what if to consider: What happens when the super-duper hybrid corn gets struck by a super-duper disease or insect that frags a huge percentage of the crop?

    I feel a future-shock novel coming on.

  • Does this take pressure off the non-renewable fuels issue? If people have heard about this are they less likely to be politicized by Dems hawking the issue? Does it take steam out of the Dems’ grassroots if they heard this was done, and make them imagine that something is being done, even if the pace isn’t that great?

    That’s how I look at it. It might have a short-term effect for Bush but it also might be a little self-interested work by Karl Rove, looking forward at his career promoting politicians in the future.

  • It could be worse. I suspected that as his popularity tanked he would become more aggressive and likely to start more wars. But if he chooses to cope with it by jawboning to the alternative fuel industry, at least there’s that.

  • tAiO,

    The fields used to grow human-consumption corn can just as easily be used for fuel-corn. And what’s going to be more profitable to the farmer? A box of corn flakes will only bring more profit to the farmer, when the cereal costs more than hybrid fuel. The starches used in polymer/plastics production will only net the farmer more when they cost more than the fuel. And I don’t even want to think about what this’ll do to the price of dairy products.

    So—when the country begins to unravel, will our “Versailles-on-the-Potomac” chimp-in-chief suggest that the starving, rather than “eating cake,” go out for a drive in an alternative-fueled motor vehicle?

    This has “national disaster” written all over it….

  • By the time I got to this discussion, you had all gone beyond speed limits…so pardon me for going back…Maybe 55 is too low for interstates…but in my old 1996 Toyota with 232,000. miles I have made it my rule to never go over 60…well hardly ever… and I get between 37 and 39 miles per gallon…with the price of gas today, for me, that is great! And I live way out in the country driving at least 20 miles round trip to the nearest store. Cars zoom by me constantly…on roads designed for 55 or less MPH. And to mention the ethanol thing…I think that is a snare and delusion…what is the point for using food to make gas? And a lot of gas to grow and harvest it?

  • In five minutes Bush could excel over all the alternate fuels progress so far, by saying “The top speed limit is now 55 mph on interstates.” — Dale, @4

    That may have been true 30 yrs ago (I wasn’t driving then; learnt late in life), but I don’t think it’s true now, with newer cars. I have a 2000 VW Passat (automatic, which I’m told gets worse milage overall than a stick-shift. But I never learnt to drive a stick shift). It has all sorts of fancy “computers” which can be set to tell you your mileage at any given moment and for a trip. I’ve tested the car — on the same 50 mile stretch of the highway — driving it both at 55 and at 65. At 55, I got slightly less than 32MPG. At 65, I got 34+ . It was only when I tried it out at 75MPH, that the mileage went back down (to about 31MPG). So 55MPH might save lives (both in accidents and in oil wars) but it does not save gas.

  • OK, I see what you’re saying Steve and of course that’s why Warsaw really wants an ethanol plant “Take my corn, please!” Thinking about it a bit more I wonder what it will to the town. The current wrangle over location stems from a concern about how the thing will smell. Now I wonder if there will be an increase in property taxes all around or other negative issues down the road.

  • Corn ain’t the solution to energy independence. A whole lot of corn is grown in areas where we’re mining ancient waters (states drawing on the Oglala Aqifer) and corn ethanol isn’t a good conversion of energy input into energy output. It barely makes more energy than it takes to produce it. Let alone that drawing down the Oglala Aquifer will make our food even more expensive and will even more rapidly dry up “America’s breadbasket.” Save the corn for feeding us or for feeding animals. We’re already eating water that can never be replaced in our lifetimes. We shouldn’t burn that water away even more quickly.

    Don’t let W do to this nation’s water supply what he did to Arbusto.

  • And where in Nevada does anyone need to be 30 minutes sooner

    It’s more a matter of how fast you can leave, which makes for the urgency…

  • We found an interesting article about the problems with Ethanol on ConsumerReports.org:

    http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2008/03/ethanol-e85.html

    “But there are some problems with increasing ethanol blends. Ethanol contains less energy than gasoline, so increasing the amount of ethanol in gasoline will likely result in lower fuel economy. Increasing standard fuel blends from zero to 10 percent ethanol, as is happening today, has little or no impact on fuel economy. In tests, the differences occur within the margin of error, about 0.5 percent. Further increasing ethanol levels to 20 percent reduces fuel economy between 1 and 3 percent, according to testing by the DOE and General Motors. Evaluations are underway to determine if E20 will burn effectively in today’s engines without impacting reliability and longevity, and also assessing potential impact on fuel economy.”

    TheSUBWAY.com would like to invite readers to post their own views and ideas in TheSUBWAY.com’s Investor Forum:

    http://investor-forum.thesubway.com/

  • It’s good to hear BP & GM talk about alternative fuels, but 50 years to implement is too long.

    http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/05/news/companies/bigoil_hydrogen/index.htm

    Perhaps this link will spark more attention:

    http://www.chevrolet.com/electriccar/

    It is GM’s electric concept car the Chevy Volt. If more people begin to demand alternative fuel cars, we should be able to speed the rate at which the technology is developed.

    We have started an Investor Forum where Investors can meet and discuss topics like this:

    http://investor-forum.thesubway.com/

  • Comments are closed.