When it’s abstinence vs. AIDS, it’s no contest

We learned in January that the [tag]Bush[/tag] administration and congressional Republicans are directing a large percentage of federal grants to combat [tag]AIDS[/tag] directly to religious groups, which, of course, emphasize disease prevention through [tag]abstinence[/tag]. [tag]Contraception[/tag] is downplayed in these publicly-funded programs, if it’s mentioned at all.

So, how’s that working out? Surprise, surprise, not terribly well.

Insistence by [tag]Republican[/tag] Congressional leaders that American money to fight the spread of AIDS globally be used to emphasize abstinence and fidelity is undercutting comprehensive and widely accepted aid models, the Government Accountability Office said in a report released Tuesday.

The report by the G.A.O., an investigative arm of [tag]Congress[/tag], examines the effect of a mandate from Congress that at least a third of United States money to prevent the spread of AIDS worldwide be devoted to sexual abstinence and fidelity programs.

It found that the provision had limited the reach of broader strategies to fight AIDS that include the use of condoms — a conclusion strongly contested by a senior Bush administration official.

The report also said the requirement had meant that officials in some countries have had to reduce spending on programs to prevent the transmission of H.I.V. from women to their newborn babies, as well as other prevention strategies.

“It is hampering their ability to implement key elements of the widely accepted model of H.I.V./AIDS prevention — the ABC approach,” said David Gootnick, the main author of the report. ABC stands for [tag]abstain[/tag], be faithful or use [tag]condoms[/tag].

Government researchers concluded that in nearly all of the countries that are receiving U.S. funds to combat AIDS, abstinence requirements undercut the “ability to develop interventions that are responsive to local epidemiology and social norms.”

In the United States, the Republican plan to use abstinence for social engineering is bad enough — federal abstinence-only guidelines and curricula don’t work, are usually littered with factual errors, and tie the hands of good teachers who want to educate students with reliable, accurate information.

But to see this approach extended to combating AIDS around the globe is simply tragic.

That’s America for you: divert at least a third of the effort the experts say will combat AIDs toward changing human nature (which preachers have failed to do from time immemorial).

  • … a conclusion strongly contested by a senior Bush administration official.

    A senior Bush administration official? Who the hell is this Bush-bot?

  • Ignorance and denial are the alters upon which the new republicans make their sacrifices.

  • Surprise surprise alright. By granting money to religious organization the Bush administration is in overt violation of the first amendment to the constitution, an impeachable offence. In the dark world of supernatural beings, threats of hell and claims of divine guidance there is a light. The Bible which “they” rely on for their license to violate their oath of office, (uphold and defend the constitution) is now a proved hoax. Over 42 million Americans agree with the find from the historical/archaeological record. The Bible being a hoax is not the sort of thing one immediately grasps, takes a little getting used to. Get used to it for it’s here to stay. Proof the Bible is a hoax is on the web at: http://www.hoax-buster.org

    Senator McCain knows about this. I’ll bet his ears burn when he gives the commencment speech at evangelical Jerry Falwell’s Liberty university. Look for him to promote their agenda which the Bush administration embraces. It’s a shame one of the few Republicans still untarnished by the evangelical strangle hold on American government is caving in to them.

  • The Republicans are much more interested in a “war on sex” than a “war on AIDS.”

    Or, for that matter, unwanted pregnancies. When loose women conceive, they should be forced to bring it to term: they deserve the misery of having a child they can’t or don’t want to support and nurture and love. That the child also will suffer–indeed, much more than the mom–seems to escape their calculations… see Rep. Frank’s line that Republican interest in “life” begins at conception and ends at birth.

  • Not only is abstinence a failed policy, it’s a dangerous one. From a monetary standpoint, it seems ludicrous.

    At least with a condom prevention program, you know the funds are going to purchase and distribute the condoms as well as providing education. With abstinence where is the money going? Directly to the preachers who were preaching abstinence for free before all of this?? Or is the U.S. purchasing and distributing chasity belts in the Third World?

  • Bill,

    How is granting money to religious org going against the first amendment? The RFP’s released for these funds are competitive and it’s perfectly legal to allow religious orgs to compete for said funds.

  • I agree with Dafali — it’s a “war on sex.” Right-wing Republicans would be quite happy if sex didn’t exist at all. If storks brought every baby into the world, it would make everything a lot easier for them.

    And Gridlock raises an interesting point — where is the money going? Perhaps…abstinence propaganda? Propaganda, after all, is something Bush & Co. do quite well.

  • Sorry, Dajafi, for misspelling your nom de plume — my fast fingers got the better of me.

  • I find myself thinking of the old algebraic adage:

    “If A equals B, and B equals C, than A equals C.”

    So…if BushCo and its Republikanner lemmings decide to spend a huge sum of money to promote a policy that’s a proven failure from the get-go…and the promotion of this particular policy that’s a proven failure from the get-go results in the otherwise-unnecessary death of many, many people…then BushCo and its Republikanner lemmings are spending a huge sum of money to fund the unnecessary deaths of many, many people.

    Or is that a bit too much?

  • Comments are closed.