When the right targets judges

For far too long, the right has been using some over-the-top rhetoric when it comes to the federal judiciary. Even conservative lawmakers have pushed the envelope pretty hard. Tom DeLay, as you’ll recall, made some veiled threats against judges after the Terri Schiavo controversy. Shortly thereafter, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said judges who are the victims of violence may bring the attacks onto themselves with liberal rulings. Just as the rhetoric started to cool down again, DeLay returned to the subject, insisting that the federal courts had “run amok” and needed to be reined in.

It contributes to a political environment in which judges have to live in fear. (via Ron Chusid)

More than two years after enraging right-wing groups by ordering Terry Schiavo’s feeding tube removed, George Greer still peers over his shoulder nervously at times.

In fact, the Florida judge told a rapt audience Friday at the American Bar Association’s annual meeting, he even used an alias when he registered at his San Francisco hotel on this trip.

Two years ago, he said, someone in the Bay Area threatened to kill him over his decision to end life support for the brain-damaged Schiavo. And even though that person was prosecuted and jailed, Greer said, he’s taking no chances.

“It is a little unnerving,” he said. “I still can’t see a strange car come down my street without wondering [who’s behind the steering wheel].”

Greer is hardly alone. At the ABA conference, attendees heard from a New Jersey judge who ruled in favor of gay rights, and soon had his home address announced on a right-wing radio show. A Texas judge ordered anti-abortion activists to stop harassing doctors, and received so many death threats, she was put under constant police protection. A California judge was targeted after reversing a death-penalty sentence.

Some extreme elements of the right just don’t take losing court cases very well.

It’s a problem at the Supreme Court, as well.

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said she and former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor have been the targets of death threats from the “irrational fringe” of society, people apparently spurred by Republican criticism of the high court.

Ginsburg revealed in a speech in South Africa last month that she and O’Connor were threatened a year ago by someone who called on the Internet for the immediate “patriotic” killing of the justices.

Now, just to be clear, I’m not blaming far-right lawmakers for death threats against judges. As John Cole noted a while back, Tom DeLay and others engage in “blatant pandering to the lunatic wing of the religious right,” but they aren’t directly responsible for how lunatics respond to their comments. These guys aren’t literally advocating violence against judges.

But there’s apparently a sense among a small but vocal part of the right that judges are fair game, and when activists don’t like a ruling, the appropriate response is to threaten violence. As a result, we have jurists making reasonable decisions, based on the law, who frequently have to live in fear.

If Republican leaders stopped stoking these dangerous fires, it might help a bit.

Are these the same people who claim to love the United Statesof America and then display a confederate flag which represents the Divided States of America?

  • Thank you Bananna Republicans. The U.S. is headed down the same road as Columbia, where Judge assasination is a common occurance. OT – In a similar vein, economics are taking us to the Mexico model, Richistan & the Peons.

    Hey, nutso Republicans, you are the terrorists. You are Timothy McVeigh.

    It’s time to legalize some drugs to make room for the domestic terrorists destined for our prisons. Tom “Bugman” Delay, I hope you are the first of many.

    Boy, that felt good.

  • “…and when activists don’t like a ruling, the appropriate response is to threaten violence.”

    Well, with role models like Bush, Cheney, Giuliani, the Kagans, etc., etc., etc. what else should we expect.

  • These guys aren’t literally advocating violence against judges.

    And there’s a reason they aren’t. If they say “We ought to kill this specific judge,” and someone does it, they could be legally responsible. So they stick to careful, lawyer approved language. Chickenshits.

  • DeLay and others, with their ideological comments, bear a heavy responsibility for what happens to judges because they give implicit permission to people with marginal personalities to be violent. The fascist right is always more ready to use violence to achieve political ends than even conservatives who believe in authoritarian rule, but respect democracy at some minimal level. Their enablers are many, and at the moment we more than our share of them.

    A small organized right-wing group will always achieve more of its objectives through violence or the threat of violence than a mass grass-roots campaign peacefully petitioning their government for redress. Please, let’s live in the real world.

  • I’m ready for a second civil war! Let’s just get rid of these right wing nut jobs once and for all and get on with fixing our country to face the challenges of the 21st century. Either that or let’s all chip in, buy some island in the south pacific, or anywhere, and let them run their Christian Taliban however the fuck they want to. These people aren’t American, their fucking communists!

  • I disagree with your final paragraph.

    I believe that lunatic inciters are wholly responsible for what their lunatic pandering will wrought.

    If I, as an official of authority, instruct my followers to lynch anyone of color because they are threatening “our way of life,” then I am wholly responsible for reaping what I have sown along with the lunatics who actually committed the atrocity. Those lunatic inciters cannot hide behind “free speech” after pulling such a stunt.

  • Yes, they are literally advocating violence to federal judges. Maybe you’re trying to protect your “centrist” cred, but the final two paragraphs don’t follow the trail of the preceding paragraphs.

    You spend the majority of your post claiming that a duck is a duck. Then it sounds as if you got weirded out and then call the duck a turkey.

    Huhn?

  • I’m expecing the dems to do pretty well in 2008. If they do real well, I do wonder what that’s going to mean to the supreme court on several levels (including my dream somehow they can find a way to get scalia off the court, but I digress).

    Here’s another question – how are these wingnuts going to react to THAT?

    25% of our country lives in a fever dream where Bush can do no wrong, the Republicans are perfect, and God is on their side. When reality comes crashing in, what’s next?

    I’ll be honest – I give it a good chance that more of them will turn violent. If they do, let’s be there to denounce, condem, and confront it as what it is – terrorism. And if any wingnut politicans defend them, let’s paint them as soft on terror.

  • Any responsible public figure would vigorously denounce threats against judges as immoral, illegal, unAmerican and otherwise totally unacceptable. No caveats. By encouraging or at least making attacks sound acceptable, DeLay and others are indeed responsible.


  • citizen_pain: I’m ready for a second civil war! Let’s just get rid of these right wing nut jobs once and for all and get on with fixing our country to face the challenges of the 21st century.

    Gee, thanks cp for giving Bill O’Reilly something he can hold up as “proof” that the entire progressive blogosphere wants civil war!

  • Look, we already live in a country where most bombs are planted in family planning clinics and offices, judges are threatened and attempts on their lives are made, and doctors have been killed by these people…

    …When do you start worrying, exactly?

  • Crissa is right. We’ve been living in a terrorist state for a couple of decades, at least. It’s only the level of intensity that has really changed.

  • When then genocide began in Rwanda, the call over the radio was to “cut the tall trees”. How is this any different? It is an open call for murder by those who understand it. We are vermin. We don’t deserve respect. Always remember, that in their eyes, we are oppressors who rule when they should be in charge. They want a 2nd Civil War where they get to smite the wicked and take back this country for God. That crave it like and addict craves his next fix.

  • Comments are closed.