When the U.S. presidential race captures the world’s attention

Clearly, as Americans, we seem to think that our nation’s presidential race is a pretty big deal, but I’d always assumed that the rest of the world, much of which may no longer consider the job the “leader of the free world,” probably wouldn’t follow the U.S. primary process very closely.

I stand corrected.

To look at the reams of coverage in newspapers outside the United States or to follow the hours of television news broadcasts, you might conclude that foreigners had a vote in selecting an American presidential candidate — or, at least, deserved one, so great is America’s influence on their lives.

From Berlin to London to Jakarta, the destinies of Democratic and Republican contenders in Iowa or New Hampshire, or Nevada or South Carolina, have become news in a way that most political commentators cannot recall. It is as if outsiders are pining for change in America as much as some American presidential candidates are promising it.

The personalities of the Democratic contest in particular — the potential harbinger of America’s first African-American or female president — have fascinated outsiders as much as, if not more than, the candidates’ policies on Iraq, immigration or global finances.

And there is a palpable sense that, while democratic systems seem clunky and uninspiring to voters in many parts of the Western world, America offers a potential model for reinvigoration.

Lord McNally, a leader in the British parliament, said, “It is in many ways an uplifting sight to see a great democracy functioning at that most basic of levels. Even with all the money, the publicity, the power of television, the person who wants to be the most powerful man or woman in the world still has to get down and talk in small town halls and stop people on the street and stand on soapboxes.”

This is actually a rather pleasant surprise. As our global standing deteriorated in recent years, it seemed more likely that international observers would be less interested in our internal politics. Oddly enough, the opposite is true — the world is ready to see Bush go, and they’re fascinated by the personalities hoping to succeed him.

In Berlin, [after the Iowa caucuses] newspaper columnists started calling Mr. Obama the “new John F. Kennedy” — no small accolade in a city that reserves a special place for an American leader who, at the height of the cold war, told a divided populace that he, too, was a Berliner. “The black American has become a new Kennedy,” proclaimed the tabloid Bild. […]

In Paris, the fascination with the Clinton-Obama duel seemed to eclipse the Republican contest. “The Republican candidates are much less well known in France,” said Alain Frachon, the editor in chief of Le Monde. “It might be wishful thinking, but the French believe that this Republican era is over.”

Not only the French. Much of the fervid absorption in the primaries and caucuses — accessible as never before on 24-hour satellite and cable television channels like CNN and Fox News — seems inspired by a hope that the American electoral process will end an era of foreign policy dominance by neoconservatives.

“There is a desperate sense of need that there must be something better than Bush out there,” said Dean Godson, head of a conservative research group in London called Policy Exchange. Or, as Thomas Valasek, a spokesman for the Center for European Reform in London, put it: “The world at large has a massive stake in the outcome of the elections. Never before has the U.S. had such a terrible reputation, a terrible image.” […]

As Ramesh Thakur, a political science professor in India, wrote: “We foreigners can but pray that the new president, whoever he or she may be, will return America to its strengths, values and the tradition of exporting hope and other optimism. And so help to lift America and the world up, not tear one another down.”

In Japan, too, there are hopes for American renewal. “Already the fixed idea, ‘Only a white man can become president,’ has been broken,” the newspaper Mainichi Shimbun said Jan. 15. “We are witnessing the history, the process of grass-roots democracy turning into the U.S. strength.”

The world is watching. I hope we don’t let them down — again.

What happens in the U.S. has an impact on other countries. And I’m not just talking about whether or not we decide to bomb someone. I’ve been part of discussion groups with women from other countries who say they are very interested in U.S. politics because very often their country will take its cue about extending civil rights to women based on how women are treated in the U.S.

BAC

  • Earlier this morning I was reading some of the European headlines and articles regarding the South Carolina Democratic primaries. I thought it to be funny that South Carolina is described as a “Poor Southern State with almost half its population being black”

    It certainly looks that quite a few European countries are ready to see an end to the Bush/conservative/republican legacy.

  • The rest of the world has discovered that when the American president is an ignorant ideologue with a personality disorder who thinks that God chose him (him!) to lead what we used to call the Free World, undesirable consequences ensue – for them as well as for us.

    No wonder they are interested.

  • Oddly enough, the opposite is true — the world is ready to see Bush go, and they’re fascinated by the personalities hoping to succeed him.

    All that may be true, but it’s also true that the world as a whole is much more interested in the US than you seem to think. US news has been prominent where ever I have been, and I lived and traveled outside the US for more than ten years.

    Even knowing that, I would occasionally be surprised at just how fascinated with details of US news people in other countries would be. For example, when I lived in Oslo, the death of John F. Kennedy Jr. in a plane crash was the front page, top-of-the-page story for the largest newspaper.

  • The world is livid in anticipation of Bush finally leaving the WH. This is why I find it almost insulting when people here actually make statements that a republican could win the WH this election. The only real race to the presidency is the democratic primaries. Why bother to wast the publics time and money? In this instance we should just go ahead and inaugurate whoever wins the democratic nomination so we can get the ball rolling on a new direction for the country. Just saying….btw…if they think Obama is the new JFK then Edwards is the new FDR and Hillary is totally unique

  • The world is watching. — CB

    Anecdotal corroboration: I mentioned — on my lacemaking list – how upset I was to discover that my husband (and, therefore, my son also) was related to Deadye Dick. Within 24 hrs, I had responses from: France, Netherlands, Germany and UK. All with the same sentiment; “at least, you can console yourself that they’re also related to Obama”. And here I thought that tidbit made rounds only in US and that my comment would be incomprehensible to the list’s members from other countries…

  • The world was ready to see Bush go in 2004; well before that, actually, but that was the first real opportunity short of impeachment. I don’t recall when a U.S, president has been so loathed outside the U.S., or been the object of such mockery. Regardless the estimation in which America is held, it still retains a powerful effect on world affairs.

  • Having the world’s remaining superpower PREEMPTIVELY attack another country got my attention too. Especially when it was the wrong country. At one time America was the world leader. Now, I’m not so sure.

    Bush has been a disaster.

  • Comments are closed.