When troops’ lives are ‘wasted’

For a Republican frontrunner, [tag]John McCain[/tag] sure can be careless.

Republican presidential contender John McCain, a staunch backer of the Iraq war but critic of how President Bush has waged it, said U.S. lives had been “wasted” in the four-year-old conflict. Democrats demand the Arizona senator apologize for the comment as Sen. Barack Obama did when the Democratic White House hopeful recently made the same observation.

“Americans are very frustrated, and they have every right to be,” McCain said Wednesday on CBS’ “Late Show With David Letterman.” “We’ve wasted a lot of our most precious treasure, which is American lives.”

There’s that word again, “[tag]wasted[/tag].”

Shortly after the Letterman interview aired, the DNC called on McCain to take back the “wasted” lives remark.

“Senator McCain should apologize immediately for his callous comments,” said Karen Finney, a DNC spokeswoman. “How is it that John McCain now believes American lives are being wasted, yet he so stubbornly supports the president’s plan to escalate the war in Iraq and put more American lives in harms way?”

That’s a good question, but I have another: how is it McCain would use the same word on national television that got [tag]Barack Obama[/tag] in hot water just two weeks ago?

On Feb. 12, during an appearance in New Hampshire, Obama told an audience that “we ended up launching a war that should have never been authorized and should have never been waged, and to which we now have spent $400 billion and have seen over 3,000 lives of the bravest young Americans wasted.”

Conservatives were apoplectic about his use of the word “wasted.” Michelle Malkin said Obama’s choice of words proves that he has a “patronizing, infantilizing, and insulting view of all American troops as dupes/victims who have squandered their lives.” Hot Air said, “Of course he thinks their lives were wasted. Everyone on the anti-war side does.” Dan Riehl referenced Obama’s comment to call him a “piece of political detritis” (one assumes he meant “detritus”) and an “ex-coke snorting, ex-social working useful idiot.” Yes, they’re a classy bunch.

Obama quickly realized that “wasted” was perhaps not the ideal choice of words. In an interview with a newspaper reporter, Obama said, “I was actually upset with myself when I said that, because I never use that term. Their sacrifices are never wasted.”

He added that he would “absolutely apologize” to military families if they were offended by the remark.

“What I would say — and meant to say — is that their service hasn’t been honored,” Mr. Obama told reporters in Nashua, N.H., “because our civilian strategy has not honored their courage and bravery, and we have put them in a situation in which it is hard for them to succeed.”

Apparently, McCain missed all of this. As such, I’m now looking forward to conservatives lambasting McCain, questioning his commitment to the troops, calling him childish names, and doubting his patriotism.

You don’t suppose it’s wrong for a Democrat to say lives have been wasted in Iraq but it’s fine for a Republican to say it, do you?

Of course McCain didn’t worry about it, because he knows IOKIYAR. The Democrats have no equivalent of the Republican noise machine, and the media will never cover any “outrage” over a Republican’s “insult” to the troops.

The Democrats’ outrage over McCain’s remark may be fake, but it’s no faker than the Republicans’ outrage over Obama’s, so that hardly explains the difference in treatment. It’s all about relative ability to play the media, along with the media’s attachment to long-established story lines about Democrats hating the troops.

  • MaCain and Obama are both correct, the lives of US Servicemen are being wasted. I spent 20 years in the military and never saw anything more wasteful. Over 3000 folks are now not with there loved ones because of lies and deceit be a bunch of chickenhawks who make sure that none of there loved ones ever see a day of military service.

  • The only hope is that anti-McCain elements within the Republican noise machine can crank it up to go after him (which is doubtful, since McCain is the most pro-Bush candidate), and the DNC is irrelevant in that. They’d still have to overcome the media’s ongoing (but perhaps slightly faded) love affair with the supposedly maverick so-called straight talker.

  • Apparently, McCain missed all of this. As such, I’m now looking forward to conservatives lambasting McCain, questioning his commitment to the troops, calling him childish names, and doubting his patriotism.

    Indeed. Paging Ms. Malkin… Oh Hot Air denizens, are you still working up your outrage and 500 word diatribe? Mr. Riehl, Mr. Riehl this is your friendly hypocrisy wake up call…

  • that’s what happens when you let nutso wingnut bloggers determine what’s acceptable political discourse in America. The fact is, those lives ARE being wasted. If they want to get angry at anyone pointing that out, they should direct their anger at Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld/Rove, etc.

  • That’s why Democrats have to stand up for themselves, especially when they’re right. McCain is a doof, but he and Obama were right. It was dumb for Obama to fall for the phony outrage and apologize for saying lives were “wasted”. He should have used his apology/clarification to ram the point home, not back off and slink away. McCain says the same thing and no one cares because there isn’t a “liberal” disinformation industry (thank god) to raise hell over manufactured bullshit. It’s like the Kerry “joke”. All of that is fake. The media participate in the smear because it’s easy and it fits their narrative. Democrats must, absolutely must, learn how the media works. On an individual basis, I don’t think reporters have a “conservative” bias (although MANY do), but they willingly report the narrative that many GOP journalist apparatchiks and right-wing think tanks create for media consumption. It’s how they “work the refs”, as Eric Alterman says.

  • This isn’t hard, this isn’t criticizing the troops. When those young men and women are sent to die for a failing cause and when their deaths do not contribute to the defense of peace, OF COURSE their lives have been wasted. We wasted them, and we owe them more than we can ever repay. Our government is at fault for wasting the lives of our loyal soldiers.

    “Wasted” is exactly how to describe their sacrifices, so why is this word being treated as radioactive? We need to take the narrative away from the chickenhawk right-wingers who constantly try to conflate our war opposition with being anti-troops.

  • Whether with blogs, the media or politicians on the right side, there is nothing they can say to get them into trouble, with the possible exception of “macaca.” What gives righties this impunity is that they never say they are sorry. They’re only misquoted, misunderstood or the contect was mistaken. It’s all the listeners fault.

    Dems might want to take notes on how this is done, not to be like the right, but to befuddle the MSM which blows a Dem remark out of proportion and shows selective deafness to the right. If Barack said “You guys just didn’t get what I said,” he could have received a free pass to Impunityland where everything he says is automatically right. “Seriousness,” that highly vaunted characteristic of rightie pundits and winger politicos, is a function of always placing the blame for controversial remarks on the other. The MSM will only takes Dems seriously if they show such seriousness.

  • I really don’t care if the right-wing blowhards carry this or not. However, I do wish to see if the main stream media, print, airwave, and whatever else there is, provides the same coverage and in the same tone as their coverage of Obama’s comment. I know what it will be, one big yawn.

  • I agree that the lives have been wasted – I think on some level, it’s what motivates a lot of us to be so concerned. The koolaid drinkers want to believe that it’s still a noble cause – it’s not.

    But Obama has a different road in this. I can say “wasted” because I don’t care who I piss off. Obama is trying to be more conciliatory and try to bring people together. That is a noble cause but he doesn’t want to make his “job” more difficult by using inflammatory language like “wasted.”

  • As long as they consider Fox News as news, the MSM will continue to take their cues from the rightwing noise machine that feeds into Fox and gain legitimacy there.

  • I agree Obama should have stuck to his words, because they fit. He could expand on them, and talk about the lives they would have led if they hadn’t been sent to fight the war that Obama rightly opposed (and which now most Americans admit was a mistake).

    Malkin does not get to decide which words mean what, she’s insane.

  • I’m sick about the continued loss of life in both Iraq & Afganistan.
    What makes the situation worse is the media. McCain will get a pass, IOKIYAR.
    How about the 2 Americans & 17 others killed in the suicide bombing where Cheney happened to be? Who were those 2 Americans? Who were the other 17? The news is like a bad action movie with tons of body count, but you don’t care because none of the characters were known.
    Well, I effin’ care!!!! These are REAL people!
    I’m sure there was faux outrage that some bloggers & commenters expressed their regret that The Big Dick wasn’t hit. These Effin “Outrage Morons” need to get some of their body parts blown off, and see how much they care.
    Steam vented. Thanks

  • Ridiculous taboo. If a person believes that the war should not have been started, was bungled, and now cannot be won, how can that person argue that the lives lost fighting the war were not wasted? A noble sacrifice made by brave men and women serving their lessers.
     
    Don’t we want political and military leaders to avoid wasting lives? Isn’t the main problem with the Bush administration that it has done so? The political problem with stating this opinion has nothing to do with logic or reality. Many of the same people expressing outrage against Obama would say Clinton wasted lives in Somalia.

  • The press is a bunch of cowards who slant their reporting in favour of the direction from which the next kick may come. The Democrats will be better at using the press when there’s a democratic majority under a democratic president, hopefully Barack Obama. And in the vein of every cloud having a silver lining, Republicans’ bellowing pieholes provide such excellent material for later laying the smackdown. Recent examples are republican threats to cut off war funding, when it was CLINTON in the driver’s seat, and Ileana Ross-Lethien’s comments under the same administration.

  • American lives are being wasted in a war unworthy of one American death. Just as the Vietnam war was unworthy of one name on a wall, let alone 55,000.

    All those lives, WASTED.

  • “If we do not do that and other Americans die, other Americans are wounded, other Americans are captured because we stay too long — longer than necessary — then I would say that the responsibilities for that lie with the Congress of the United States who did not exercise their authority under the Constitution of the United States.”

    John McCain, arguing for an “immediate, orderly withdrawal” from Somalia, 1993

    “That’s all I have to say about that”

    Forrest Gump

  • Not only are American Lives being wasted – there are many more Iraqui lives being wasted. Everyone knows what these comments mean – every life lost since the start of this war has been because of a LIE, so yes, their lives are wasted. This is indeed a ridiculous taboo that feeds into to the “support the troops” yellow magnet mentality. Along with always calling those serving in the military “the best and the brightest” – sorry to say, THAT just isn’t the case. Look at demographics of enlistees (usually to improve their financial prospects), and see how the standards have had to be lowered so drastically thanks to BushCo. It is all a joke.

  • Comments are closed.