‘When you put your trust in the sword, you lose the cross’

The growing push-back against trying a conservative partisanship and [tag]Christianity[/tag] is hard to miss. Earlier this month, for example, progressive religious leaders such as Bob Edgar, Tony Campolo, and Jim Wallis argued, “We are furious that the religious right has made [tag]Jesus[/tag] into a [tag]Republican[/tag]. That’s idolatry. To recreate Jesus in your own image rather than allowing yourself to be created in Jesus’ image is what’s wrong with politics.”

It’s important to remember, however, that we’re not just talking about Christian leaders with liberal worldviews. Conservative [tag]Christians[/tag] are coming to the same conclusion. Consider the Rev. [tag]Gregory A. Boyd[/tag], for example.

Before the last presidential election, he preached six sermons called “The Cross and the Sword” in which he said the church should steer clear of politics, give up moralizing on sexual issues, stop claiming the United States as a “Christian nation” and stop glorifying American military campaigns.

“When the church wins the culture wars, it inevitably loses,” Mr. Boyd preached. “When it conquers the world, it becomes the world. When you put your trust in the sword, you lose the cross.”

Mr. Boyd says he is no liberal. He is opposed to abortion and thinks homosexuality is not God’s ideal. The response from his congregation at Woodland Hills Church here in suburban St. Paul — packed mostly with politically and theologically conservative, middle-class evangelicals — was passionate. Some members walked out of a sermon and never returned. By the time the dust had settled, Woodland Hills, which Mr. Boyd founded in 1992, had lost about 1,000 of its 5,000 members.

A fifth left, but Boyd was also encouraged by congregants who were relieved to have their pastor defend the notion that the Christian church need not be an extension of the [tag]Republican Party[/tag].

The Woodland Hills isn’t yet common, but it’s hardly an isolated incident.

“There is a lot of discontent brewing,” said Brian D. McLaren, the founding pastor at Cedar Ridge Community Church in Gaithersburg, Md., and a leader in the evangelical movement known as the “emerging church,” which is at the forefront of challenging the more politicized evangelical establishment.

“More and more people are saying this has gone too far — the dominance of the evangelical identity by the religious right,” Mr. McLaren said. “You cannot say the word ‘Jesus’ in 2006 without having an awful lot of baggage going along with it. You can’t say the word ‘Christian,’ and you certainly can’t say the word ‘evangelical’ without it now raising connotations and a certain cringe factor in people.

“Because people think, ‘Oh no, what is going to come next is homosexual bashing, or pro-war rhetoric, or complaining about ‘activist judges.’ “

Not surprisingly, those who prefer to combine the GOP and Christianity are less than pleased. At Woodland Hills, one angry church volunteer told a family pastor, “You’re not doing what the church is supposed to be doing, which is supporting the Republican way.”

Obvious idolatry notwithstanding, there seems to be a perceptible shift in what serious Christians are willing to tolerate with regards to the politicization of their faith.

“Most of my friends are believers,” said Shannon Staiger, a psychotherapist and church member, “and they think if you’re a believer, you’ll vote for Bush. And it’s scary to go against that.”

Perhaps, but it’s getting a little less scary all the time.

One can only hope that real Christians will start to realize just how little the GOP does that is good and Christian.

Care for the poor, comfort for the widowed and orphaned, making peace not war, etc..

“You’re not doing what the church is supposed to be doing, which is supporting the Republican way.”

That is particularly delusional.

Bye for the week, I’m off to the outer banks. I bet all the greatest threads pop up while I’m gone. Just ask Frak to post more and you’ll know exactly what I think (grrrr!).

  • Religious extremism is the greatest threat to America today. And I’m not talking about Islamist terrorists, but the rise of the American theocrats who increasingly control the Republican Party.

  • For all too many of the ‘Christian’ nutjobs, the church is not about faith. It’s a tribal marking. It’s part of the God, Guns and Country Music trifecta.

  • Wrapping the cross in the flag almost always leads to trouble. When churches make the decision to back an existing worldly belief or regime, they risk having to eat crow when the belief or regime changes.

    It was that way when Galileo saw four moons orbiting Jupiter. The Roman Catholic Church felt secure in the Ptolemaic universe of “seven heavenly bodies” revolving around Earth. Arranged by the number of days taken to complete a cycle, they were Moon, Mercury, Venus, Sun, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn. It’s that ordering which produced our seven day week. Having staked their religious belief on the unaided eyes of the ancient Greeks, they were unable to shift gears in light of the new evidence easily available through the telescope.

    Similarly, “everyone” knew that biological evolution was impossible because the universe hadn’t been around long enough for it have occurred. James Ussher (1581-1656, Bishop of Armagh), using the “begats” of the Bible, summarized here, calculated that the Earth and Adam were created in 6,000 BC. Darwin at first believed that, too (it was printed in the marginal notes of the Church of England’s officially approved Bible which he carried with him on the Beagle). On that voyage Darwin read Charles Lyell’s (1797-1875) Principles of Geology which contained empirical evidence that the Earth was much, much older than people commonly believed. Those churches which had firmly attached themselves to the previously successful “creationist” view were left in the dust when Darwin published his Origin of Species in 1859.

    I’ve never understood the need of churches to make worldly alliances or make scientific pronouncements. If there’s anything to religion (which I doubt) it must lie in it’s claim to “eternal truths” separate from the world, from empirical science and all earthly systems of governance. Apparently, that’s not good enough for them.

  • “You’re not doing what the church is supposed to be doing, which is supporting the Republican way.”

    God forgive me, but that’s just fucked up.

    So the church is supposed to serve the GOP?

  • The story was published in yesterday’s NYT and first appeared online Saturday evening. Whenever I check the site, the headline for the story had changed – all varying degrees on the theme that this particular congregation was paying a price for challenging the GOP/Christian combination. The on-line headline must have changed at least 4 times between Saturday evening and Sunday but always with that theme making it apparant that that was the gloss that the NYT editors were trying to put on it. It was interesting that that is what they wanted to emphasize.

  • this is good reporting on what appears to be a trend developing. thanks for bringing it to my attention with citations.

  • ***”You’re not doing what the church is supposed to be doing, which is supporting the Republican way.”***

    Yep—and the wingnuts who bantered that form of thinking the first time around—it was Sadjucees, Pharisees, and Scribes back then; they’d not quite gotten around to inventing the GOP yet—nailed a carpenter from Nazareth to a cross the first time around—now didn’t they?

  • Thank God that some semblance of sanity is starting to break through. All I can say is, “More!”

  • Kevin Drum posts this today. Very interesting, considering who’s talking:

    “BAPTIZING POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS”….I can’t quite tell whether he approves or disapproves, but in any case Andrew Sullivan drew my attention today to an interview with Mike Gerson, formerly George Bush’s chief speechwriter, in the current issue of Christianity Today. Here are a couple of excerpts:

    What challenges do you see for evangelicals who want to broaden the movement’s social agenda?

    It’s probably a long-term mistake for evangelicals to be too closely associated with any ideology or political party. The Christian teaching on social justice stands in judgment of every party and every movement. It has to be an authentic and independent witness….

    Where specifically do you think the Religious Right has gone off track?

    Some of it is what I would call baptizing policy recommendations, as if there were a Christian view on tax policy or missile defense. These are questions of prudence and judgment on which reasonable people disagree.

    Now, it’s not as if Gerson has suddenly become a social liberal or anything, but it’s still slightly stunning to see a major player in the Bush administration advise evangelicals not to become “too closely associated” with any political party. Karl Rove must be spinning in his casket.

  • Comments are closed.