White House labels accountability on North Korea ‘silly’ and ‘gratuitous’

Let’s see, under Bush’s watch, and following a foreign policy embraced enthusiastically by Republicans in Congress, North Korea has dramatically increased its weapons material stockpiles, withdrew from the Non Proliferation Treaty, threw out U.N. weapons inspectors, tested numerous missiles, and detonated a bomb. All of things the president said he would not allow to happen, have happened.

Bush White House, do you have a comment?

Today, a reporter asked if President Bush believes he has made any mistakes with respect to North Korea. White House Press Secretary Tony Snow responded, “Oh, my goodness…it’s a silly question.” Later, he called the question “gratuitous.” Snow explained that “you need to give presidents the benefit of the doubt when national security is involved.”

This is classic, quintessential Bush White House. A cursory glance at the administration’s policy towards North Korea highlights just how wildly, dangerously unsuccessful it’s been. If you’d like some kind of explanation for why the policy has failed so spectacularly, it’s “a silly question.” Of course it is; his “accountability moment” was two years ago.

And the very idea that Bush deserves “the benefit of the doubt when national security is involved” is, perhaps, the single most amusing thing Tony Snow has ever said. The whole idea behind credibility is someone earns it by demonstrating competence. Bush would probably have the benefit of the doubt on national security, if it weren’t for Iraq. And North Korea. And Iran.

As Kevin Drum put it yesterday, “The Bush/Cheney administration took a bad situation with Iraq and made it even worse. They’ve taken a bad situation with Iran and made it even worse. They’ve taken a bad situation with North Korea and made it even worse. At every step along the way, they’ve deliberately taken actions that cut off any possibility of solving our geopolitical problems with anything other than military force.”

“Benefit of the doubt”? Asking about possible mistakes is “silly”? Is Snow serious?

Here’s the transcript via ThinkProgres. Read it and weep.

QUESTION: Looking back, is there anything that the president would have done differently? Does he believe he has made any mistakes in this region?

SNOW: Oh, my goodness.

QUESTION: It’s a fair question.

SNOW: No, it’s a silly question.

QUESTION: (OFF-MIKE)

SNOW: Yes, it is, because… (CROSSTALK)

QUESTION: You just talked about…

SNOW: Well, let me ask you, give me some characterization of what you might think, because what typically happens is that any answer to that question is spun into: President made mistake, regrets.

What you do as president of the United States — and I have said this repeatedly from this podium, and you need to give presidents the benefit of the doubt when national security is involved — is the very best, in their judgment, of what they can do.

Now, what will happen is over time you find out, Hmmm, that data point wasn’t right. We need to adjust. So for every adjustment, sure, in perfect hindsight you would want perfect information and therefore perfect policy.

But instead what you do have in this administration and in prior administrations is a full-on effort to do what you think, based on the intelligence and the facts available to you, that’s going to be the most effective way to secure the safety of the American people.

QUESTION: The notion that that’s a silly question, when you have a president who draws a red line three years ago and says, We will not tolerate nuclear weapons, and now you have a country that just tested a nuclear weapon, you don’t think it’s fair to ask for some accountability as to what happened and whether there were mistakes made?

SNOW: The accountability lies in North Korea, not in Washington.

Put it in a time machine; future generations won’t believe it.

and you need to give presidents the benefit of the doubt when national security is involved

Unless that president is named Bill Clinton.

I love it. “We’re the only ones who can protect you. Except if we can’t.” ShrubCo should have to post a little disclaimer when they give their “Tuff on Terra” speeches.

  • SNOW: The accountability lies in North Korea, not in Washington.

    That line says it all. I think they should enscribe that on a big bronze plaque, and put it up somewhere prominent- say, the Washington Monument or something. That about sums up the entire Bush Regime.

  • If the press doesn’t smell that as blood in the water, they won’t know what is. Tony’s doctrine of presidential infallability has no basis. He can’t even spin the f-ups anymore.

    This is a Republican picture of Dorian Gray. They may think they are maintaining a good looking facade, but there’s an increasing ugly picture developing of how poorly this adminstration has handled everything since coming into office. The policy of talking tough and not backing up the talk is now proved to be BS. Tony Snow isn’t man enough to admit that. …And yes the proof of their incompetence is now a mushroom cloud.

  • “At every step along the way, they’ve deliberately taken actions that cut off any possibility of solving our geopolitical problems with anything other than military force.” – Kevin Drum

    Sadly, I doubt they have maintained the military capability to achieve any solutions using military force either. So basically, they’ve bankrupted America.

    Snowjob is being pretty laughable.

  • Boy George has broken everything he has put his hands on – U.S. Foreign Policy, Iraq, The Constitution!

    Vote the Rascals Out in ’06 and ’08! -Kevo

  • ***”Benefit of the doubt”? Asking about possible mistakes is “silly”? Is Snow serious?***

    And now, ladies and gentlemen, you know why I call this guy “SnowFlake.” He has—with absolute, certainty—gone over “the Great Wah-Zoo.” He’s got kool-aid in his veins, and a microchip in his brain-stem that makes him do all sorts of Pavlovian tricks for “his Masters.”

    Sit up.

    Play stupid mouthpiece for a stupid president-in-name-only.

    Whine, beg, and snarl as needed when you lack the unquestionable attention of everyone in the room.

    Urinate on the blue fire hydrants only; the red ones are your fellow lackeys, and they’re being urinated on quite enough, thank you.

    Out of curiosity—do former White House press secretaries get “protection” (Secret Service, etc.) after their masters are thrown out of the White House? If not—then should I reserve my place in line for “the stoning of SnowFlake?”

    And am I allowed to use paving bricks?

  • These people are so out of touch! They don’t deserve even pity, because they are revolting. How can the country stand two more years? Bush is no student, especially of human nature. His policies are heartless and foolish. He lacks so much, but lets start with compassion. The people of NK are starving and their leader is desperate. If W keep listening to his voices, we may not have a USA in two years because some crazy has blown us to kingdom come to get our attention. Why wouldn’t Bush keep our treaty agreement? Why won’t he talk now? Why won’t the man do his job?

  • “Put it in a time machine; future generations won’t believe it.”

    Ah, but if you sent it into the past, it would sound perfectly commonplace to inhabitants of the Nixon years. Back then, the words “National Security” had magical powers that could make almost any question disappear.

  • There’s a reason why his name is Tony Snowjobber. At least they have a moron out in front who’s so stupid even the idiots in the WH Press Corpse can see it.

  • Since talk of the President making mistakes or doing anything different is silly, maybe the media needs to pose the question differently:

    “The President said three years ago a North Korea with nuclear weapons was simply unacceptable. Yet North Korea claims to have successfully tested a nuclear weapon earlier this week. In light of this, Tony, what would you say this administration has done right in terms of preventing North Korea from developing nuclear weapons?”

    I’d like to hear the answer to that one. It doesn’t seem like the “six-party talks” or John Bolton have been much of a deterrent.

  • Tony Snow on President 42:

    “I understand what the Clinton administration wanted to do. They wanted to talk reason to the government of Pyongyang, and they engaged in bilateral conversations. And Bill Richardson went with flowers and chocolates… and many other inducements for the “Dear Leader” to try to agree not to develop nuclear weapons, and it failed. We’ve learned from THAT MISTAKE.”

    VS.

    Tony Snow on President 43:

    “I have said this repeatedly from this podium, and you need to give presidents the benefit of the doubt when national security is involved ”

  • Asking Snow-Flake if Bush has “made any mistakes” or “could have done anything differently” simply invites the response that was given. Bush make mistakes??? Bush do something differently??? Please. White House News Whores should know by now that asking any question that insinuates Bush’s stupidity or ignorance or missteps by his misbegotten “administration” will be taken as a challenge and the only response given is “Bush never does anything wrong. Whatever it is, it’s someone else’s responsibility. Demanding accountability from this pResident is unpatriotic.”

    Worst. Fucking. President. Ever.

    Any questions?

  • My favorite is: “based on the intelligence and the facts available to you” which is patently false — we know from Woodward that they systematically ignored “intelligence and facts”

  • Yes, and now saving Iraq is up to the Iraqis.

    Oh yeah, and GW is solving global warming too.

    Is it too late to get a vote of confidence on Bush on the Nov ballots?

  • If Bush and chums were so intent on building the Star Wars defense against their most cited target — NK nuclear missiles — then why would they have ever been serious about negotiating with NK? The assumption was always that negotiations would fail. So why try?

  • “QUESTION: Looking back, is there anything that the president would have done differently? Does he believe he has made any mistakes in this region?”

    “SNOW: Oh, my goodness.”

    “QUESTION: It’s a fair question.”

    “SNOW: No, it’s a silly question.”

    “QUESTION: (OFF-MIKE)”

    My guess is that the (OFF MIKE) comment went something like “Fuck you, Snow, you stupid prick. Answer the fucking question. Or did whoring out to the White House suck whatever remaining gray matter you had left in that gynormous bucket sitting on your shoulders?”

    I can only guess, that is.

  • Are you guys kidding? This is freaking brilliant! Snow did what every REAL American should do, his job.
    Just take the money, say everything is fine, smile like an idiot, never use your constitutional rights.Thats all anyone need to do, right?Just work harder, do your job, keep your mouth shut. As long as “we get paid”, anything we do for that beautiful, lush green money is justified, right??. C’mon, Kids lets all sign up for the green Kool-aid, see, whats best for Corporations is best for America, mmm….Kool aid….

    And besides,the soundbite tech at CorPirateNewsco will edit it to make Joe Billybobeercan love Mr Snow for trouncing that damn liberal journalist for wasting his time, after all, Snow has work to do! It’s the journalists didn’t ask questions, we could save money with shorter news conferences. There, I just saved us all some tax money. Silly Liberals.
    La, la la la, al la la I’m not not licking toads!……

  • Sadly, I doubt they have maintained the military capability to achieve any solutions using military force either. So basically, they’ve bankrupted America.

    Does anyone besides me think that’s just what the neocons have intended all along? After all, their interests lie mostly in the private sector and the US government is pretty much the last obstacle standing between the largest corporations/wealthiest individuals and absolute world power. This is what I’ve felt for decades, yet I’ve heard very little on this theory.

    On the other hand, I feel like the inherent power that comes with such high government positions may have tainted their original plan. Perhaps this is the “hidden” conflict of this administration.

  • Comments are closed.