ABC News reported this week that a group of so-called “Principals” — including Vice President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of State Colin Powell, CIA Director George Tenet, Attorney General John Ashcroft, and National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice — met dozens of times in the White House to “discuss and approve” specific interrogation techniques to be used against suspected terrorists.
The AP moved the ball forward on this story today.
Bush administration officials from Vice President Dick Cheney on down signed off on using harsh interrogation techniques against suspected terrorists after asking the Justice Department to endorse their legality, The Associated Press has learned.
The officials also took care to insulate President Bush from a series of meetings where CIA interrogation methods, including waterboarding, which simulates drowning, were discussed and ultimately approved.
Those are actually two very interesting sentences. The first noted that Cheney & Co. asked Justice to “endorse the legality” of the interrogation techniques they’d decided to use. That seems backwards — the “Principals” should have sought legal parameters from the Justice Department about what was and was not permissible under the law. Directing administration attorneys to sign off on torture techniques is, shall we say, problematic.
The second noted that Bush was “insulated.” It’s quite a concept. I’m trying to imagine the president walking through his White House asking his chief of staff, “Hmm. Dick, Rummy, Colin, Tenet, Ashcroft, and Condi are all huddled together. What’s that all about?” Only to hear in response, “Don’t worry about it.”
It’s vaguely reminiscent of the “out of the loop” defense utilized during the Iran-Contra scandal. Everyone around the president was engaged in criminal behavior, but we need not blame the president directly because he had no idea what was going on and no clue what the top members of his White House team were doing.
How reassuring.
The AP added to the ABC report, inasmuch as it highlighted how the DoJ’s torture memos might relate to the interrogation decisions made by the “Principals.”
Between 2002 and 2003, the Justice Department issued several memos from its Office of Legal Counsel that justified using the interrogation tactics, including ones that critics call torture.
“If you looked at the timing of the meetings and the memos you’d see a correlation,” the former intelligence official said. Those who attended the dozens of meetings agreed that “there’d need to be a legal opinion on the legality of these tactics” before using them on al-Qaida detainees, the former official said. […]
“No one at the agency wanted to operate under a notion of winks and nods and assumptions that everyone understood what was being talked about,” said a second former senior intelligence official. “People wanted to be assured that everything that was conducted was understood and approved by the folks in the chain of command.”
As ACLU Legislative Director Caroline Fredrickson said, “With each new revelation, it is beginning to look like the torture operation was managed and directed out of the White House. This is what we suspected all along.”