I appreciate the fact that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales believes an aggressive public relations offensive will help him keep his job, but to avoid being laughed at, again, he should probably add some nuances to his defense.
For example, yesterday, Gonzales appeared on a Seattle talk-radio show. Seattle is of particular significance, given John McKay having been fired as the area’s U.S. Attorney. Asked to explain McKay’s ouster, Gonzales said, “Listen, we made a decision at the Department as to the appropriate way forward. There was nothing improper about the decision here … There’s no evidence whatsoever, and it’s reckless and irresponsible to allege that these decisions were based in any way on improper motives.”
Now that’s funny. Up until now, administration officials have grudgingly acknowledged that the questions about the purge scandal were legitimate, but no one should rush to judgment. Yesterday, however, Gonzales insisted that his critics are “reckless and irresponsible” for daring to point out the obvious: that the U.S. Attorneys were fired for purely political reasons.
Indeed, McKay’s ouster is one of the more glaring examples.
Gonzales’ statements are distortions. McKay revealed earlier this month that Rep. Doc Hasting’s (R-WA) office contacted him and pressured him as to the status of an ongoing investigation into voter fraud in the midst of a tight gubernatorial election. Emails released this week show that then-Gonzales’ chief of staff Kyle Sampson touted McKay for a federal judgeship, saying that it is “highly unlikely we could do better in Seattle.” But one month later, McKay was listed as one of the seven attorneys in the process of being “pushed out.” “What happened between those dates to reverse McKay’s political fortunes is a bit of a mystery.”
And now his critics are being “reckless and irresponsible”? After having months to prepare for these questions, is this really the best Gonzales can come up with? Apparently.