Why does Falwell hate America?

Guest Post by Morbo

The Rev. Jonathan Falwell is proving to be a real chip off the old blockhead. The son of the late Jerry Falwell, Jonathan took over Thomas Road Baptist Church and the television ministry after his father died last year. (Another Falwell son, Jerry Falwell Jr., is chancellor of Liberty University.) Anyone hoping for a more moderate tone out of Lynchburg is disappointed.

Jonathan Falwell recently penned a column titled “Our Dishonest Nation.” He complains about a recent report by the General Accounting Office that found some government employees have been diverting tax funds for personal use.

“I imagine this is typical behavior within many businesses around the country. We have become a nation increasingly comprised of me-first citizens who have no problem using deceitful practices to satisfy their personal needs or to enhance their lifestyles.”

What comes next is predictable:

“First, I see the GAO report as being reflective of our nation’s continued departure from its Judeo-Christian heritage. This nation was founded on biblical principles, and those principles largely sustained us until about a half-century ago. As our nation has turned away from (and even become hostile toward) the Ten Commandments and other biblical principles, we have seen our citizenry become progressively more dishonest and deceptive. Crime has risen, our schools have failed and our culture has become vulgar and crude. I believe it’s all related to the ouster of God from our schools, our media and our society.”

So the bottom line is, we’re all a bunch of crooks. But you’ll notice the one thing missing from Falwell’s screed is anything like proof of his assertions. Are we really more dishonest now than we were in past years? Can Falwell cite a controlled-study on that?

Yes, some people are just crooks. They have always been with us and always will be. But they are not the majority. Most Americans are fundamentally decent and honest. Yet Falwell tars us all with the brush of dishonesty.

I’ve noticed that Falwell and other members of the Religious Right “America stinks” brigade tend to assert that things went in the toilet about 50 years ago. So we’re to believe everything was just wonderful until 1958? Has Falwell never heard of the Petticoat Affair, Tammany Hall, Credit Mobilier, the Whiskey Ring, Prohibition-era gangsterism, the wave of bank robberies during the 1920s or Teapot Dome?

It seems to me an argument can made that we’re more moral now, at least in some areas. I’d like for Falwell to travel back in time and ask a black man who wants to vote, eat lunch in a Woolworths or attend the University of Mississippi if he thinks all is well. Ask that of a Jew who wants to join a “Protestants-only” country club or a woman who wants to become a doctor. Modern society has its ills — as all ages do — but I think we’ve made impressive progress in some very important areas.

What’s galling to me is that people like Falwell say things like this and then have the nerve to assert that it’s the liberals who don’t love America. It sounds to me like Falwell is unhappy living among a bunch of thieving, no-good, lying Americans. I’d like to recommend a favorite right-wing line: If you hate America so much, why don’t you go live somewhere else?

I’d say we need to call in some auditors – generally when right wingers start ranting about some perceived vice in the culture they’re involved in it themselves. They’re just setting up the ‘but everyone does it!’ defense for when they get caught.

  • Of course, Morbo, you’re absolutely correct. Crime and corruption in governments existed 50 years ago and 200 years ago and 1000 years ago. It has nothing to do with people departing biblical principles.

    Besides, how many stories of theft and corruption can you find within Church organizations including Falwell’s own organization?

  • Why does Falwell hate America?

    I love that headline. My first thought was “Isn’t he Dead?”. Which is always a great way to start the day.

    Johnny’s 50 years is the standard period for blaming American liberalism for the decline in culture. The fact that it is the Republican’t party that is full of sicko exploitive homosexuals, along with the televangist churchs, kind of disproves their thesis. But don’t tell them that.

    Conservatives believe in Truthiness (cr Stephan Colbert) while Liberals believe in Empiricism. But Evidence means nothing when you have Faith.

  • Conservative ideology is heavily dependent on myth – the past was better than the present, the invisible hand of the marketplace provides pure and natural social justice, taxes hurt the economy, wealth trickles down, intelligent design, abstinence only sex education, manifest destiny. etc. As the late Joseph Campbell would tell us, myth is an extremely powerful force.

  • Isn’t this kinda like biting(or snapping) at the hand that feeds you? I think its crooked to give tax exempt status to faith based institutions,period.Chuck Grassley has been investigating some of the biggest names in prosperity preaching televangelists-most of whom sit on the bard of Oral Roberts University-Roberts being the ORIGINAL televangelist. Oddly enough,John Hagee(,McCains’ ReverendWright),is a member of the Board of regents for ORU,BUT he is NOT being investigated…….. Speaking of chips off the blockhead,Hagee’s son was preaching on TV just last night………ORU is invlved in a sex and money scandal-a recent lawsuit(among many) has alleged a one billion $$ secret bank account at the University,althugh the financial statements show the university in the RED.-BTW,John Hagee established Christians United For Israel-CUFI, a couple of years ago-he even preaches with a Hebrew shawl around his shoulders. This is the preacher who called the Catholic Church”The Great Whore of Babylon.” Check out CUFI on Google.

  • “Most Americans are fundamentally decent and honest. Yet Falwell tars us all with the brush of dishonesty.”

    But if we send him loads of money, we’ll be absolved!

  • So how does Falwell explain Jim Bakker, Jimmy Swaggart, and Ted Haggard?

    “I believe it’s all related to the ouster of God from our schools, our media and our society.”

    Yeah, nothing screams “I’m full of God’s love!” more than the lynching of a black man.

    Or the Wounded Knee massacre.

    Or “civilizing” Philippinos with the barrel of a Krag.

  • Furthermore, how depressing to find Falwell has sons, and they’re a pair of hucksters like their father. I had hoped that after Fatty snr., Dobson, and the rest of that crowd had passed on to their great reward roasting for Satan’s pleasure, that some of the younger, more tolerant evangelists (the purpose driven life bloke, can’t remember his name, springs to mind) might lead the movement into the second half of the twentieth century.

    How naive of me.

  • Great post, Morbo. One would add that the idea that God has been “ousted” from media and society is pretty much ludicrous. Tell it to me when an openly non-religious person has been elected to some high national office. We, as a nation, demand overt and humiliating avowals of religious faith as a prerequisite for participation in the public discourse and certainly for any kind of role in making policy. But Falwell, his late father, and their ilk got where they are today by playing the victim and will continue to do so.

  • Thanks Morbo.

    Okay I admit it. I ousted God out of my life. But I had to. For one thing I was going broke because He demanded 10% of everything I earned. Shattered my budget. I lost my wife because she wasn’t really comfortable with the missionary position. But when he tried to get me to stone people for all kinds of silly reasons I had to put my foot down. I do feel a little bad about kicking Him out because he obviously needed pyschiatric treatment. But really it was Him or me.

  • “This nation was founded on biblical principles, and those principles largely sustained us until about a half-century ago.”

    Isn’t “about a half-century ago” when Cold War anti-communist hysteria gave us “In God We Trust” and the “Under God” version of the Pledge?

    The irony, it burns.

  • I’ve noticed that Falwell and other members of the Religious Right “America stinks” brigade tend to assert that things went in the toilet about 50 years ago. So we’re to believe everything was just wonderful until 1958?

    No, he said “about” 50 years. More precisely, he was referring to 1954. You see, that was when Brown v. Board of Education was decided and the so-called “natural order” of things started to break down. It was when the society, collectively, officially decided that the status quo was unjust and wrong, and needed to be change.

    In the mind of a conservative, Brown marks the beginning of all the ills we have today — things like the federal government recognizing its obligations to protect all citizen; (successful) challenges to authority; belief that one can known better than what one’s been handed by previous generations; the notion that states also had obligations and that they’d be forced to come along for the ride.

    Not to mention all those formerly-acquiescent blacks who now became “uppity”…

    You can see why 1954 is the conservatives’ annus horibilis.

  • .
    We must not forget thet the raygun FCC opened the airwaves to the televangelists. This led to swagert, baker falwell, robertson haggert and the rest of the TBN like scum.
    ,

  • @#15-Mr. Gilroy- The date you quote is quite telling in light of the activities of the underreported group-The Fellowship. This uber conservative ,and uber low profile Christian Dominionist entity has its roots in Nazi and fascist values. This is the group whom Hillary refers to as her spiritual support mentors. (I posted on this on a previous thread here). The North Carolina smears done on Mc Cain a number of years ago,are alleged to have been their handiwork. McCain,in his defense,at the time ,rejected this ultra right wing ideology. and they jacked back! You can be assured Obama will be ,and is, the recipient of this Christian Dominionist smear. Here are some links from Wikipedia. The article entitled Christian Mafia is the most detailed and informative,IMHO.( Rove is a member from way back.) PLEASE avail yourself of this knowledge._________References:
    ^ Joshua Green, Take Two: How Hillary Clinton turned herself into the consummate Washington player The Atlantic Monthly, November 2006
    ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Doug Ireland, Hillary, l’Amérique, et l’intégrisme chrétien, Bakchich, 13 April 2008 (account of Jeff Sharlet, The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power, HarperCollins, 2008) (French)
    ^ Lisa Getter, “Showing Faith in Discretion”, Los Angeles Times, September 27, 2002
    ^ a b c Jeffrey Sharlet, “Jesus Plus Nothing”, “Harper’s Magazine”, March, 2003
    ^ Anthony Lappé, “Meet ‘The Family'”, Guerrilla News Network, June 13, 2003
    ^ Lara Jakes Jordan, “Fellowship finances townhouse where 6 congressmen live”, Associated Press, April 20, 2003
    ^ Kathryn Joyce and Jeff Sharlet Hillary’s Prayer: Hillary Clinton’s Religion and Politics Mother Jones (1 September 2007)
    ^ Joshua Green “Take Two: Hillary’s Choice The Atlantic (November 2006)
    ^ “Transcript: Bono remarks at the National Prayer Breakfast”, USA Today, 2006-02-02. Retrieved on 2008-03-22.
    ^ Frommer, Frederic. “Minnesotan to deliver keynote speech at National Prayer Breakfast”, Star-Tribune, 2008-02-06. Retrieved on 2008-03-22.

    [edit] External links
    Wayne Madsen, “Expose: The Christian Mafia”, Insider Magazine

  • That’s rich, coming from the latest in an infamous line of con men and hucksters whose forte was bilking the gullible and ignorant using the the oldest con of them all – “believe or burn!!”

    Worse, these grifters breed like rabbits. Can somebody please put something in the water in those “universities” or whatever they call those Bible-banging hellholes?

  • If and Athiest were to say some of the things that Wright, Hagee and other religious zealots have said, they would be rightfully be denounced as both delusional and hateful. But, if it’s a “person of faith” saying such things, they tend to be handled with kid gloves. And if you do denounce them, the zealots will raise of accusations of “anti-religious bias”. This is the result of a combination of political correctness from the left and anti-secularism from the right.
    Take for instance all these “end time” beliefs in which God is supposed to “purify” the world through a genocide that would put the Nazis to shame. (And what is hell, after all, but an eternal concentration camp?)
    Many churches in Germany have historically been very anti-Semitic. Was it any surprise that the Nazi’s were able to rally the masses against the Jews? Hitler himself was said to be fascinated with the book of revolutions. And what was Nazism itself but a religion? They managed to take the worse of Paganism and Christianity and roll it into one.
    Many Churches were instrumental in inspiring and carrying out the genocide of Rwanda.

    One of the most hateful and violent places on Earth is the Middle East. It is also one of the most religious places on Earth. One of the least violent places on Earth is Denmark, which also has one of lowest levels of Church attendance.

    Really makes one think, doesn’t it?

  • Comments are closed.