Why reporters fawn over John McCain

This morning, almost in passing, MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough mentioned the national press corps covering the presidential campaign and said, “I think every last one of them would move to Massachusetts and marry John McCain if they could.”

A little crude, sure, but Scarborough’s point is not without merit. Last week, for example, McCain finished fourth in the Iowa caucuses, behind a guy who barely even tried to campaign. No one has ever finished fourth in the Republican caucus and gone on to win the GOP nomination. The national media, therefore, naturally declared the fourth-place finisher the big winner of the night.

TP pulled together some of the embarrassing, ingratiating praise media personalities offered for the Arizona Republican.

MSNBC’s Mike Barnicle: “McCain’s stance on the war. They view it because of who he is and the eye contact during these town meetings. He’s the Babe Ruth of town meetings.”

Politico’s Mike Allen: “Tonight is a fantastic night for John McCain…. He’s one of the biggest winners of the night.”

Newsweek’s Jon Meacham: “To me, the great story about Sen. McCain is, when in doubt, give principle a try.”

Fox News’ Carl Cameron: “Inside Washington, he’s been a real maverick outsider.”

John McCain may very well be the first fourth-place finisher in nominating history to come out of Iowa with momentum and media adulation. It’s worth taking a moment to consider why.

Jason Zengerle, noting that there’s “no denying that the media absolutely loves McCain,” highlights a point that often goes unsaid.

The simple explanation is: McCain affords the press access like no other candidate. In the McCain campaign, there’s no barrier between candidate and reporter. If you have a question for McCain, you don’t have to bother going to his press secretary; you simply go ask him. On some days, you literally spend eight hours with the candidate, just riding with him in the back of his bus peppering him with questions on everything from Pakistan to his philosophical thoughts about suicide. Toward the end of the day, this amount of unfettered access to the candidate can actually be a bit of a problem, when you start to run out of questions for him and there are awkward silences. But, on the whole, it’s hard to overstate the sort of goodwill this access engenders among reporters.

Still, I do wonder why McCain allows this sort of access, given all the risks it entails.

Well, maybe. I explored this a bit last year in a piece for The American Prospect, and found that the risks may not be as great as they appear. In the 2000 campaign, an enamored press corps was willing to cut McCain all kinds of slack. In October 1999, for example, aboard the campaign bus, McCain referred to the Vietnamese as “gooks.” Not only did reporters not call the candidate on the use of the slur, almost none of them reported on McCain’s ugly word choice. According to one insider I talked to, there was a “gentleman’s agreement” in place — in exchange for access and freewheeling interviews, most campaign correspondents would knowingly look the other way from some of McCain’s more “candid” blunders.

And therein lies the point: McCain gets all of the benefits (media adulation) and few of the risks (carte blanche to act like an idiot without being called on it).

Zengerle did add one point I hadn’t heard about, though:

With all of the love between the media and McCain, I do sometimes wonder if voters feel like a third wheel. At yesterday’s packed town hall in Salem, which was in a middle school gym, I witnessed several confrontations between voters sitting in folding chairs on the floor and the reporters who were standing in the aisles blocking their views.

Maybe there’s such a thing as being too tight with political reporters.

This may be silly, but I wonder if Mitt Romney could use this. Fred Barnes advised McCain last year to abandon his cozy relationship with the national media in order to be more appealing to conservatives, who, of course, hate the national media. That clearly hasn’t happened. Maybe he could try to roll out an H.W. Bush strategy: “Annoy the media; vote Romney.”

Could it simply be that the Main Steam Media (MSM) is trying to shape this campaign? That they are not in fact the objective observers we have been told to expect?

McCain may play well with the media, but he’s still anathema to portions of his own party.

And if he wins New Hampshire, I don’t think fourth place in Iowa is really going to matter (thank God!).

  • Given the sort of little wuss (who will never admit to having been chased home from school) who becomes a reporter, or course being around a Big Tough Big Brother is totally cool.

  • I forgot: “the sort of little wuss who got chased home from school and was chosen last for the team…”

  • At this point it might just be the media trying to support who they feel is the strongest Republican for the general, because they want a horserace not a blowout.

    But certainly an earlier episode of the media covering for St. John the “Maverick” comes to mind:

    …Earlier this month, at a Republican Senate fund-raiser, McCain told a downright nasty joke making fun of Janet Reno, Hillary Rodham Clinton and Chelsea Clinton.

    The fact that McCain had made the tasteless joke was reported in major newspapers, as was the vain attempt by his press secretary to initially deny what McCain had done. But in several major newspapers, the joke itself was kept a secret…

    http://www.salon.com/news/1998/06/25newsb.html

  • Oh, ok, so Hillary and Obama should just give reporters the same access as John McCain gives them, and then the media will fawn over them just like the media fawns over John McCain. Wow, you’ve got it all figured out, CB. Thanks for another one of your helpful “The media likes John McCain because he gives them unprecedented access” stories. One thing you certainly avoid doing is carrying water for a questionable media.

  • CB, I was just using my brain for 10 seconds or so, and now I have second thoughts. Don’t you think if a reporter wanted to get a great interview from Hillary or one of the Dems, the reporter could just ask the press people and get the great interview? That sounds right to me- so reporters don’t really have to say all this stuff about John McCain to ensure that they’ll get a great interview from him.

  • For years I’ve observed who succeeds and who doesn’t in my business. Very often it’s the folks who reach out and ask for help who succeed, not the ones who do take care of themselves. Those who reach out get other to invest in their careers. This seems to be what McCain has done. He probably listens to them, seeks advice, uses their quips in speeches, and they are invested in him. Why wouldn’t it work in politics as well as it does elsewhere?

  • Wait, so there must be some other reason why the media favors John McCain.

    Naw- there couldn’t be.

    No one has ever cheated at anything, there has never been a slanted arbiter or an infiltrator or corruption in any endeavor in the world. I guess you are right and it is just McCain charm that the Dems can’t match. Hell, isn’t everyone you know falling in love with him just like the reporters are?

  • I know you hate to admit it but

    McCain is the most likely person to win the Republican nomination.

    That was not true before Iowa.

    Therefore, common sense says that McCain was the big winner.

  • Cleaver writes

    I forgot: “the sort of little wuss who got chased home from school and was chosen last for the team…”

    Story of your life isn’t it?

  • That’s it. McCain always looks like he’s riding in the back of the bus with his media buddies. Sometimes it makes him look comfortable, sometimes it just makes him look lazy in the debates.

    Now that I’ve commented, I’ll try using my brain for ten seconds to see if I have any second thoughts. 1…2…3…4…5…6…7…8…9…10. Nope, nothing.

  • Dale –

    Thank you for taking your 10 seconds of extra thought prior to hitting “Submit.”

  • Re #12,

    I’ve got to think Neil is right about this. Somehow the MSM looked at Romney’s second place in Iowa as a repudiation of his campaign, McCain’s poll numbers in New Hampshire, Huckabee’s overall electability and Guiliani’s implausable strategy and decided McCain was the winner.

    Is that fawning? I don’t know. But one poll graph I saw showed McCain quadruple his last poll number to his Iowa vote percentage (in the WaPo I believe) so that figures in also.

    And if McCain wins tomorrow, the MSM will look pretty good for a while. Long enough for folks to forget, perhaps.

  • The other big pass McCain is getting is on his “let’s stay in Iraq for a hundred years! No, make it 10,000!” comments.

    Can you imagine if a Democrat had said that?

    But John Edwards’ haircut invented the internet. Or something.

  • “the sort of little wuss who got chased home from school and was chosen last for the team…”

    that’s a bit slanderous isn’t it tom?

  • Is this the same group of reporters that prematurely called for the McCain’s demise in late 2007???

  • Zeitgeist said:

    Dale –

    Thank you for taking your 10 seconds of extra thought prior to hitting “Submit.”

    Sure. Think nothing of it. 🙂

    For the record I don’t really object to multiple posts, commenting is hard work.

    Hey if Huckabee and Obama are the candidates, everything since Iowa was wasted effort.

  • JRS Jr said:

    Is this the same group of reporters that prematurely called for the McCain’s demise in late 2007???

    This is actually a good point, although the larger point about reporters is still valid.

    Hey Jr, did you get home from school safe today?

  • It’s hard to not get the feeling that the Fourth Estate is acting like it’s the Fourth Branch of Government (sorry Dick, I know that’s your claim.) The media swaggers around as if someone doesn’t want to kiss up to them and play by their rules they’ll be broken. Look at their recent track record: they trashed the Clintons and made Bush who he is.

    If Washington doesn’t kowtow to them a fix for the healthcare system turns in “socialized medicine” or a hunting trip either turns a candidate into the Marlboro Man or becomes a Dukakis moment. They make the kings and they will make or deny the national agenda. The media has become the ultimate Washington insider and when guys like David Broder call D.C. “our town” it really feels like he’s speaking about the Washington press corps and pundit crowd.

  • JFK was the same; very friendly with the press, and they loved him in return (and kept quiet about his personal life).

  • The media cares nothing for the real life struggles of ordinary Americans. The media set the “who would you want to have a beer with” standard and now they are doing it again. Obama makes them feel good about themselves (look how open-minded we are to be in love with a black candidate), but as soon as McCain is the Republican nominee the erstwhile JFK will be portrayed as the new Adlai Stevenson, an egghead professor compared to the war hero Ike/McCain. They all have their health insurance; what does Chris Matthews and his ilk care if millions of us don’t, so long as their hearts can flutter for their latest man-crush.

  • “McCain affords the press access like no other candidate”

    True dat. McCain has the ability to become a guest on Meet the Press AND Face the Nation, the Sunday after Obama & Huckabee pull off great wins…

    And, both interviews happening (in eerie voice) at.. the.. same… time…

  • The MSM especially the Washington crowd is as full of themselves and narcissistic as McCain is.

  • Senators read serious papers, attend important meetings, travel the world, and learn about coming trends & concepts. It gives them an edge. And sometimes a narcissistic/messianic bid for attention/importance takes over. McCain’s been stumbling around drunk-on-the-stuff for what 2 or 3 presidential campaigns now? Tough guy. Lieberman, Bradley, Biden, Graham, Dole (ad nauseum) could only last one cycle…Got to credit John’s wife for holding up well.

  • Q: Why do reporters fawn over McCain?

    A: It’s a fireworks show…No one get’s hurt. John’s a regular on MEET THE PRESS. Does his schtick, and it’s over. Same with Joe Lieberman, a regular for Wolf Blitzer [CNN]; Has something on most issues, big or small. Safe, narrow, high quality, no surprises…Not going to present any challenges the outlet can’t handle.

  • I am sick of hearing about the mainstream media. They are not part of the constitutional make-up of the U.S. political conduct, yet they are everywhere–even in the case that decided that Bush was to be president, where is was stated that one of the national news teams had “called” the election. Who are these people? How do we get out from under them?

  • Q: Why do reporters fawn over ‘Honorable John’ ?

    A: John’s a ‘stars & bars’ towel snapper; So hop-on-the-bus, get some ‘STRAIGHT TALK EXPRESS’ feed, while knowing it’s unlikely your shop manager will be getting any calls from the sponsors asking, “Who’s side are you *^&#@#!* on?”

  • I agree McCain gets a pass from the press, but the non-reporting of his “gooks” comment also has a lot to do with the invisibility and marginalization of Asian American racial issues in mainstream discourse.

  • Here’s Brooks on McCain today:
    “In the Senate, he sits in the back of the Republican policy lunches cracking jokes at the hired spin-meisters”
    Clearly, McCain is 71 going on 12..

  • The narrative of the 2008 campaign is being written as we discuss the unsavory connection between McCain and the media. Obama, too egotistical and dumb not to recognize the reality, is being built up as the Democratic nominee so as to be a stooge for the Republicans in the fall.

    McCain is being built up as some kind of “comeback” kid because of his “victory” in finish a well-beaten fourth in Iowa.

    This NEEDS to be a campaign issue. Why the other Republican candidates are not raising this is a mystery to me.

    Nobody has a Karl Rove this time to knock off media hero John McCain.

  • Why reporters fawn over John McCain…

    …because he looks like a baby seal and all reporters love feel-good animal stories.

  • All their base belongs to McCain…
    On a more serious note, I think they are simply trying to make up for letting Bush (via Rove) nut-punch McCain in the ’00 SC primary. Very unbecoming of a “serious” DC press corps to let a decorated war veteran get savaged in such an obviously dishonest way.

  • Comments are closed.