Yank Rove’s security clearance

There have been a number of excellent responses from Dems on the Hill to the Rove scandal, but one stands out for me.

Harry Reid said, “The White House promised if anyone was involved in the Valerie Plame affair, they would no longer be in this administration. I trust they will follow through on this pledge.” Charles Schumer wrote the White House asking Rove to “tell Americans what he knew, when he knew it, and who he may have told about Valerie Plame’s identity in order to clear the air once and for all.”

But my personal favorite was Sen. Frank Lautenberg of a New Jersey.

“Karl Rove has accused liberals of not understanding the consequences of 9-11, but he’s the one who blew the cover of a covert CIA agent. The President should immediately suspend Karl Rove’s security clearances and shut him down by shutting him out of classified meetings or discussions.

The excuses offered by Karl Rove’s lawyer don’t pass the laugh test. Naming someone’s spouse is the same as naming them. And as a 31-year veteran of politics, Karl Rove should know that if you want to keep a secret, you don’t tell a reporter.”

This works so well because it gets to the heart of Rove’s defense. To hear Rove defenders tell it, he learned that Joseph Wilson’s wife was a CIA agent and then passed that information on to reporters. As part of this argument, we’re told that Rove didn’t know Plame worked as an undercover agent, so what he did shouldn’t be considered scandalous.

But even if we accept this account at face value (we shouldn’t, of course, but just for the sake of conversation), this shows ridiculous judgment on Rove’s part.

As Kevin Drum put it:

But really, don’t you think Rove’s first instinct upon hearing that Joe Wilson’s wife “works for the CIA” would be to wonder what she does and whether it’s OK to pass this along to other people? After all, the guy’s a senior White House aide, not a ten year old.

It’s exactly what makes Lautenberg’s argument all the more persuasive. If the defense for Rove is that he was careless in sharing classified information, then it’s not unreasonable for a senator to suggest that Rove lose his security clearance and isolate him from classified briefings. By the GOP’s own argument, Rove has proven himself unreliable and reckless with classified information.

As the Philadelphia Daily News put it, “It’s now clear that Rove, President Bush’s chief political street fighter, can’t be trusted with the nation’s secrets. Not when a cheap political attack can be made.”

Post Script: Speaking of Lautenberg, it sounds as if he’s going to be one of the leading critics in this scandal.

On Air America’s Morning Sedition, Mark Maron and Mark Riley were interviewing NJ Senator Frank Lautenberg regarding his call for Karl Rove to lose his security clearance as a result of the Plame leak.

Maron said, “Karl Rove is guilty of treason, isn’t he?” Lautenberg responded, “Yes, I think so.”

When Senators are accusing White House Deputy Chiefs of Staff of treason, things have reached a new level.

Of course Rove’s splitting of hairs is ridiculous—just how many wives does Wilson have? How did Rove learn that Wilson’s wife was CIA in the first place? Who else in the administration spoke to reporters? My bet is on Scooter Libby and Elliott Abrams. BOPNews cites one law that Rove may have violated:

8 USC 19 372:
If two or more persons in any State, Territory, Possession, or District conspire to prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof, or to induce by like means any officer of the United States to leave the place, where his duties as an officer are required to be performed, or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties, each of such persons shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six years, or both.

I wonder how many other laws Rove may have violated?

  • The security clearance tack is brilliant. At the very least Rove has proved himself to lack the discression necessary to be privy to such information. Incompetent in the least, treasonously malicious at worst.

    The Republicans have been attacking the Dems as being anti-American for constructively critizing the management of the war. Rove proves the other side are instead the true traitors for starting a war for political and personal advantage and for playing games with state secrets.

    Even if Rove stays in his job, we should make sure the tag of traitor continues to hang around his neck.

  • 5 Questions For Rove-McClellan-Bush Now…
    1. If Rove did not commit a crime, why has he continuously lied about his involvemnet?

    2. Does the administration continue to believe that outing a CIA agent is a serious crime?

    3. Based on prior statements by the administration, either Rove lied to Mr. McClellan or Mr. McClellan lied to the American people- which was it?

    4. Mr. McClellan and President Bush have both told the world that if the leaker was discovered he would be fired. Is Mr. Rove going to be fired, or has this administration once again lied to the world?

    5. Does the President believe that Mr. Rove owes apologies to Mr. Wilson, Ms. Plame, the american people, and the world?

  • Good point at TPM:

    Just another bit of kindling for the fire. When Karl Rove et al. revealed that Valerie Plame was a covert agent at the CIA, they also compromised the front company — Brewster-Jennings & Associates — where she and other agents involved in counter-proliferation ‘worked’. See this old Post article for more.

    — Josh Marshall

  • Comments are closed.