‘You have to twist your mind up so much to justify doing that’

It’s extremely difficult to feel sympathy for those who commit heinous acts, even in a time of war, but it’s nevertheless worth remembering the impact torture has on the torturers.

The American interrogator was afraid. Of what and why, he couldn’t say. He was riding the L train in Chicago, and his throat was closing.

In Iraq, when Tony Lagouranis interrogated suspects, fear was his friend, his weapon. He saw it seep, dark and shameful, through the crotch of a man’s pants as a dog closed in, barking. He smelled it in prisoners’ sweat, a smoky odor, like a pot of lentils burning. He had touched fear, too, felt it in their fingers, their chilled skin trembling.

But on this evening, Lagouranis was back in Illinois, taking the train to a bar. His girlfriend thought he was a hero. His best friend hung out with him, watching reruns of “Hawaii Five-O.” And yet he felt afraid.

“I tortured people,” said Lagouranis, 37, who was a military intelligence specialist in Iraq from January 2004 until January 2005. “You have to twist your mind up so much to justify doing that.”

Being an interrogator, Lagouranis discovered, can be torture.

Whether one can feel compassion towards Lagouranis or not, his story is an important one. As Spencer Ackerman explained, Lagouranis returned from Iraq, where he was a trained military interrogator, and “blew the whistle to Human Rights Watch about how deeply coercive interrogations have taken root in Iraq.” It took courage to do so, and his disclosures helped make a difference.

But Lagouranis can’t forgive himself for his conduct. I don’t know if he should.

For Lagouranis, problems include “a creeping anxiety” on the train, he said. The 45-minute ride to Chicago’s O’Hare airport “kills me.” He feels as if he can’t get out “until they let me out.” Lagouranis’s voice was boyish, but his face was gray. The evening deepened his 5 o’clock shadow and the puffy smudges under his eyes.

Not long ago in Iraq, he felt “absolute power,” he said, over men kept in cages. Lagouranis had forced a grandfather to kneel all night in the cold and bombarded others in metal shipping containers with the tape of the self-help parody “Feel This Book: An Essential Guide to Self-Empowerment, Spiritual Supremacy, and Sexual Satisfaction,” by comedians Ben Stiller and Janeane Garofalo. (“They hated it,” Lagouranis recalled. “Like, ‘Please! Just stop that voice!’ “)

Now Lagouranis’s power had dissolved into a weakness so fearful it dampened his upper lip. Sometimes, on the train, he has to get up and pace. But he can’t escape.

I don’t really have a point here. Lagouranis committed unspeakable acts and is how haunted by his behavior. Frankly, given his remorse and disclosures, I’m not sure whether to feel sorry for him or not. He was brutalized, not by an enemy, but by his conduct. That may sound like some kind of justice, but given his trauma, has he paid too high a price? Are his superiors who encouraged the torture unable to escape their pain? Do they feel any pain at all?

We’ve talked a few times about the futility of asking whether torture “works,” but this story is a reminder of an angle that usually goes unmentioned — whether the tactics even “work” for the interrogators themselves.

This isn’t just this man’s fault. Our government asked him to commit these horrible acts to people and destroy himself in the process. One shouldn’t avoid feeling pity for him as well.

  • How many years do you think it will before the truth comes out?

    What is the truth?

    BUSH GAVE DIRECT ORDERS TO TORTURE.

    By the way…

    Brit Hume’s tortuous torture question in the first republican debate…
    And the glee with which the candidates stepped up to the rack…
    Are a way of making the hidden truth palatable for delivery some day…

    Yes Virginia… we really did torture people to death…

  • It’s hard to feel sorry for this guy. He’s like the rapist who apologizes to his victim. He had to know that what he was doing was wrong. Too bad for him that his conscience wouldn’t let him get away with it.

  • I feel no sympathy, only pity. He should have had the courage to refuse to do what was requested of him.

    Also, if the voices of Ben and Janeane were so horrible, why didn’t they start using tapes of Bush? Talk about torture.

  • This is also one of the best arguments against capital punishment–the act itself brutalizes the executioners. And not just the guy pulling the lever, but the country which condones it.

    The entire Republican party seems to have been brutalized by torture. They clap and stomp and cheer at more, more, more, and that has to mean that, somewhere in their hearts or souls, they have become darkly hardened, unusually insensitive, increasingly lacking in the ability to experience tenderness, a complete stranger to the virtue of mercy. They’ve not only hardened themselves, but they are on a slide toward ever increasing rigor–if only to avoid precisely the anguish that Lagouranis suffers.

  • Am I strange in feeling no animosity towards these guys? I mean, war is ugly. That’s why you think long an hard before dashing off to invade some country for kicks. I have little doubt these kids would have gone on to have normal lives if they hadn’t been sent off to war and instructed to interrogate these prisoners this way.

    It’s not like we have a system that discourages prisoner abuse, as we had back in the Geneva Convention days. We now have a system in place that encourages and rewards torture, and punishes scruples. There is no outcry from the public, none from our leaders, none from the media. The only people who have complained about abuse have been the ones tasked with carrying out the orders — the military and CIA. Interesting, that.

    I could care less if the actual interrogators are punished. All my animosity is directed at the people that went out of the way to force people of conscience to live with the guilt of carrying out their sins. They ain’t the ones having trouble sleeping.

  • I’m sure lots of criminals feel bad after doing their crimes.

    We need to punish anyone involved with this, to make tomorrow’s criminals think twice about doing it. We should save the harshest punishments for the people who ordered clear violations of US law, not the guys who followed the orders. They probably need counseling more than anything.

  • Do you think Cheney ever gave a thought to the dehumanizing effect on OUR people of inflicting torture? The greater evil is what is visited upon the victims, but the degrading of our own is also evil and yet another unrecognized long-term cost of this disastous war.

  • The reason he can’t forgive himself is that he had to know at the time that what he was being ordered to do was wrong, and he did it anyway. Blowing the whistle after he returned from Iraq is all well and good, but it doesn’t change what he did.

    But the real problem is with the people making the decisions that result in orders being given to low-level military to carry out.

    And that extends to those who voted for the MCA.

    Not only do you have inhuman treatment being given to detainees, you have a culture that is resulting in this kind of treatment being given out in the field, against civilians, in their homes and villages and towns..

  • I hope he forgives himself. If he doesn’t, this will go around and around again. If he suffers, other people around him suffer, then they spread it out and it goes on and on until we have this split polarized society where it’s ok to bomb, start wars and torture other people.

    Kind of like what we have now.

    As the saying goes: “Garbage in, garbage out.”

    He is definitely responsible for his actions. The important thing for me is what lead him to make such decisions? What leads people to feel superior or think they can dehumanize others so that torture and imperialism can happen.

    I honestly hope he heals and learns something valuable from this experience. Then he can cause change so that it doesn’t happen anymore. Revealing what was happening is definitely a start.

  • Nothing shocking. Nothing new. Nothing learned. We are IDIOTS. The whole human race. This guy isn’t unique. He exists in every age, in every war in all places at all times. The lessons are taught and taught and taught, and still we stupid humans refuse to learn.

    George Bush is a Caesar who would torture and kill Jesus himself as Americans cheer. We bathe in the blood of innocents and complain when we don’t get clean.

    At least we can assuage any guilt we might have by participating in this 9-5 cubicle democracy.

    There. I’ve done my part!

  • Bush said he sleeps pretty well these days. I’m sure the others who ordered the torture sleep just fine also.
    And yes, there was a public outcry against torture from a suppressed populace.
    There are interrogators and then there are people who torture. Justice will always find a way, though we may never see it. Bad dreams, cancer, loss of that closest to you, is there anything too harsh for those who sin against humanity.
    There was never any information gained from torture that made us any safer no matter how they try to spin it.
    May they all be brutalized as much as they were brutal. The Nazis considered their torturers “heroes” also. Humanity disagrees.
    No matter what this president says I feel anyone guilty of torturing human beings should be on trial for crimes against humanity, hopefully one day they will be.

  • gorp wrote: It’s hard to feel sorry for this guy. He’s like the rapist who apologizes to his victim. He had to know that what he was doing was wrong. Too bad for him that his conscience wouldn’t let him get away with it.

    I respectfully disagree. I don’t believe that rapists are committing their crimes because the organization that they belong to and support have asked them to do it, i.e. the Army.

    I can understand that people are reluctant to give him sympathy. It is easy for us to say from the comfort of our homes and offices that we would have done differently. But none of us can ever really know that for sure, can we?

    The fact that he even feels remorse speaks to the fact that he does have a conscience which is better than not feeling any remorse. Maybe his committment to obeying orders did not give him a choice. He deserves sympathy but not absolution from the what he did.

  • Some parents have apoplectic seizures about their children playing violent video games like “Grand Theft Auto” and then watch marathon episodes of “24” on A&E. What is the difference? They should compare how many Dems watch Torture TV like “24” to how many Republicancers watch and wish they had an opportunity to torture someone for their country. Torture becomes acceptable after a campaign to demonize or dehumanize the victims. Herr Goebbels would be proud of America’s media for following his example. America has way too many morons that believe all Moslems had something to do with 9/11 and still are trying to attack us. I wonder who led them to believe that.

    I have no sympathy for the torturer in this story much as I have no sympathy for a child molester that is assaulted in prison. Does that make me an evil person? Germans used the defense, “I was just following orders”, after WW II. It was not an acceptable defense then. I don’t believe it should be an acceptable defense now.

  • “But none of us can ever really know that for sure, can we?”

    I respectfully disagree. We all have a choice. It is not like a gun was being held to his head. What is the downside? That he has some minor charges brought against him for disobeying orders, and possibly gets dishonorably discharged? It’s not like there would be very severe punishment for such things, in light of the punishments that have been handed out for all sorts of more serious offenses coming out of this war. This isn’t liek the VT shootings where people were challenged on what they would do in a life or death situation. True, some people would never say no and do this because they were ordered and felt they had to. But I have a feeling that many folks would in fact say no to this if placed in the same situation.

  • This has been my wife’s big, conscientious objection to this war all along (and to most wars for that matter). You take relatively young people, you break down their individuality and subordinate it to the orders of commanders. If done correctly, they have little left of what we consider “free will” – you dont want them overthinking, having an internal existential debate in the middle of a battle. We want them to be able to reflexively kill other human beings. That is what war is. They will see unimaginable carnage – their enemies and their friends. They will experience fear and pressure, the desire to go home, the desire for revenge. Every gaping exit wound, every severed limb in the street, every gasping, dying child leaves a mark on the psyche.

    This is not due to illegal acts or abnormality. This is war, by its very definition. You cannot wage one without these effects.

    And then we send tens, hundreds of thousands of people with these experiences, these scars back home to mix in. Underserved by the mental health community, in many cases by the physical health community.

    My wife points out that war leaves a scar on this nation – no matter how far away the battlefield – for literally a generation. The story of this interrogater, whether or not one feels sorry for him as a single individual, is a perfect example of what she is talking about. She appears, sadly, to be on to something.

  • For those in the DC area:

    Wednesday, June 6, 2007
    12:30 PM – 1:30 PM Lecture — LCPA Veteran’s Forum
    Mumford, 6th floor James Madison building Library of Congress
    Iraq war veteran Tony Lagouranis discusses his book “Fear Up Harsh: An Army Interrogator’s Dark Journey Through Iraq” in a program sponsored by the Library of Congress Professional Association Veteran’s Forum. Contact: (202) 707-5034

  • bubba wrote: I respectfully disagree. We all have a choice. It is not like a gun was being held to his head. What is the downside? That he has some minor charges brought against him for disobeying orders, and possibly gets dishonorably discharged?

    Minor charges and a dishonorable discharge may not seem like a big deal to you. But many of our volunteer armed forces are enlisted because this is their livelihood and have limited employment opportunities elsewhere. If you had never done anything since you graduated from high school except be a soldier, it is a pretty scary thought to try to decide what you would do if you weren’t. A dishonorable discharge equals no benefits and minor charges may impede your ability to get another job.

    Since I don’t know exactly what his motivations were, I refuse to judge him for not speaking out sooner or acting differently.

  • Iraq war veteran Tony Lagouranis discusses his book “Fear Up Harsh: An Army Interrogator’s Dark Journey Through Iraq”

    He’s got that ever present sense of remorse that always comes with a book tour.

    Put me in the glad he came forward, but won’t be forgiving him category. He can wax poetic about his hands being tied or believing he was protecting our freedoms, but in the end he committed unspeakable acts against other human beings.

    Who cares if he gets uncomfortable riding the train?

  • The sister, your comment, that I responded to, was this: “But none of us can ever really know that for sure, can we?” I can for a fact state unequivocally that I would have had no problem saying “no, I will not do that” regardless of the situation. And I do believe that there are many others out there who would have no problem doing the same, regardless of the ultimate consequences or potential consequences–that was, I think, the very clear point of my post.

    With that said, however, something tells me that not everyone in the Services would even be considered for these tasks. There is probably a certain profile that the military leaders look for to assign to such tasks. So I probably would never have been assigned to do such things. But I still feel no sympathy, and only pity. We are all, ultimately, responsible for our own actions, whether they are done with or without coersion of any kind.

  • I’m glad he’s talking about it. Good, maybe some good can come of his actions. Maybe he can stop things from getting worse.

    He can also live with what he did. If he wants redemption, let him earn it for what he’s done.

  • Since I don’t know exactly what his motivations were, I refuse to judge him for not speaking out sooner or acting differently. — The sister, @19

    But we do, sort of, know what his motivations were… :
    Not long ago in Iraq, he felt “absolute power,” he said, over men kept in cages.

    “Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely” — isn’t it how the saying goes? Right there, my level of sympathy for him went way, way down. Before, I did feel some. Like Zeitgeist’s wife, I’ve always thought that the way war brutalizes *everyone* who comes in touch with it, the way it puts indelible stains on everyone’s psyche, is something not talked about sufficiently. And, sometimes, there are extenuating ciscumstances: fear for one’s life (not just one’s lifestyle) as in the case of kapos in the Nazi death camps, is one example. The Army training, promoting blind, unquestioning obedience is another.

    But… Feeling “powerful” while abusing other human beings? That’s pathological, not pitiful.

  • I don’t disagree that what he did was horrific and disgusting. So, maybe it’s my Buddhist learnings coming out that has lead me to this argument. His Holiness the Fourteenth Dalai Lama writes that developing compassion leads to greater inner peace. It isn’t always easy to be compassionate, especially for those that we feel least deserve it. But it is those individuals that will benefit the most from it.

    He wrote: “Whether people are beautiful and friendly or unattractive and disruptive, ultimately they are human beings, just like oneself. Like oneself, they want happiness and do not want suffering.”

    Anyone wanting to read more can find it here.

    Maybe if everyone in the world took his view, we wouldn’t have had a situation that Mr. Lagouranis unfortunately found himself in.

  • The sister,

    I applaud the depths of your compassion, but I find it hard to forgive someone who I don’t believe is truly remorseful to begin with. As I said before, he seems to be overcome with the same guilt that often accompanies book tours.

    I think he looked at some polls, saw the way the wind was blowing, saw a chance to rake it in and instead of spending the rest of his life trying to atone for what he’s done he’s going to profit from it.

    To me, further insult to a horrible injury.

  • I can’t see how you all can judge a man who you know only through the account of another. A friend of mine is a writer who specializes in writing about torture in the Chicago Police Department. What he’ll tell you is that anyone who believes that what they are doing is what society wants them to do is capable of these acts. Plenty of scientific evidence points to the speed with which ordinary people are transformed into willing torturers when placed in the right situation.

    I would not condemn the soldiers as readily as those who knowingly created the situations conducive to such brutality while hiding in air-conditioned bunkers in DC.

  • “I was following orders” is no more acceptable today than it was during the Nuremburg trials. A crime against humanity is a crime against humanity; a war crime is a war crime; barbarism is barbarism. American forces during the Second World War—which makes Iraq look like a trip to a Peter, Paul, and Mary Christmas concert, for crying out loud—did not require the inhumane brutalities that have been employed by this administration—and those who were/are/will be just “following orders.”

    Lagouranis is finding himself in the position of “Marley’s Ghost.” No matter how hard he tries, he is forever barred from the simple acts of “making Mankind his business.” For Marley, the barrier was Death. For Lagouranis, the barrier is a cacophony of sins more heinous; more subhuman; more fundamentally hellish than anything Dickens could write about.

    Lagouranis may well find himself forever unable to free himself from the chains of his own forging; he commited the actions for which he now finds himself unable to acquire atonement. Dealing with that is his business—and his business alone. But it is “Mankind’s Business;” indeed, it is Mankind’s Duty to bring the superiors of this soulfully-tortured individual to a Justice that is both swift, and certain….

  • Comments are closed.