Dobson responds to Kuo revelations

Following up on yesterday’s items, I’ve been curious to see how the religious right might respond to new accounts from [tag]David Kuo[/tag], the deputy director of the White House Faith-Based Office. After all, Kuo saw first hand that the Bush gang held evangelical supporters in contempt — Karl Rove reportedly called them “the nuts” — and simply wanted to exploit religious conservatives for partisan gain.

The far-right GOP base has probably suspected for years that they’re being used, cynically, by Republican elites who don’t genuinely care about the movement’s agenda, and here’s a White House insider coming forward to say all of their fears are absolutely true. How would a group like James Dobson’s Focus on the Family respond? According to an email the group sent to its members this morning, the group refuses to believe its lying eyes.

“The release of this book criticizing the Bush administration’s handling of its faith-based initiative program seems to represent little more than a mix of sour grapes and political timing. David Kuo’s book doesn’t hit shelves until next week, but excerpts released by media outlets paint the picture of a dissatisfied federal employee taking shots at the White House effort to connect faith-based nonprofit groups with legitimate societal needs.

“Big media will no doubt play this story to the hilt in the next several weeks, because it allows them to take aim at two of their favorite targets: President Bush and socially conservative Christians. Sadly, Kuo’s characterization of his former colleagues, bosses and mission — mischaracterizations, really — will be fed to the public as truth.”

I realize it must be difficult for a mark to come to terms with the fact that he’s been conned, but this is pretty silly.

First, Focus questions the timing of the book. The truth is, Kuo started raising concerns about what he saw at the White House Faith-Based Office in February 2005. This isn’t some last-minute, 11th-hour shocker intended to affect the elections.

Second, if Kuo’s book, “[tag]Tempting Faith[/tag],” was written with the midterm campaigns in mind, he wouldn’t aim to help Democrats — Kuo in an evangelical conservative Republican.

Third, [tag]Kuo[/tag] is a “dissatisfied federal employee”? Well, obviously. Kuo went to the White House to work on an initiative he genuinely believed in. Once there, he found charlatans who didn’t care about the religious right, or helping the poor, or the initiative itself. He stuck around, tried to make things work, but finally resigned in frustration. Of course he’s a “dissatisfied federal employee.” Why is that an insult?

The truth is, groups like Focus on the Family should be thanking Kuo. Rove & Co. are all smiles when dealing with Christian conservatives in person, but behind closed doors, the faithful are derided and mocked. It would appear to be useful information for those who’ve been scorned.

Kuo has ripped back the curtain for [tag]Dobson[/tag], but instead of expressing appreciation, Dobson and his allies have asked that the curtain be put back where it was. They prefer the masquerade, thank you very much.

Dobson’s willing to turn the other cheek, as long as the money still keeps rolling in from the treasury.

  • Sure, but this assumes that Dobson cares, What if he’s happy where he is, with less influence than people think but still lots of access and goodies? Maybe it’s closer to the truth to say that Dobson’s followers have been conned by Dobson and the WH.

  • CB, you are missing the Dobson rationale for existence. He’s there to take money from American Evangelicals and lead a good life off it. In the process, he gives some of it to the Republican’t party in exchange for meaningless platitudes and devisive legislation.

    Dobson is a charlatan. All the Theocratic Reactionary leaders are. Kuo is real, if misguided, and thus a True Christian.

    Rove just exploits the system and does what he can to keep it in place. That’s why his instructions to Kuo were “Just give me a f**king Faith-Based thing”.

  • These preachers are nothing but con men fleecing their flocks. They care nothing about anything but money.

  • Dobson, and his ilk, are businessmen first. They are just like the republicans in that they use social conservativism to their advantage for personal enrichment and power. Dobson doesn’t care about social conservativism, he cares about maintaining his tax free status. He uses his position as a religious leader to campaign for the republicans (which should cause a revocation of their tax free status with the IRS), and in turn, they look the other way. He’s just trying to keep his wagon hitched to the gravy train.

    This is why he is willing to criticize Kuo at the expense of his followers.

  • Bush loves me! This I know,
    For Karl Rove tells me so;
    Big bucks to Him we send,
    so we are tight and they depend.
    Yes, Bush loves me!
    Yes, Bush loves me!
    Yes, Bush loves me!
    Karl Rove tells me so.

    Bush loves me! loves us still,
    When I take from the weak and ill;
    From His Air Force One on high,
    Comes to take photos with my pride
    Yes, Bush loves me!
    Yes, Bush loves me!
    Yes, Bush loves me!
    Karl Rove tells me so.

    Bush loves me! He who tried,
    To ban the homos far and wide;
    He will wash away their sin,
    But those bastards caved in.
    Uh, Bush loves me?
    Uh, Bush loves me?
    Uh, Bush loves me?
    Karl Rove tells me so.

    Bush loves me! He still say,
    Vote for me all the way;
    He’s spends this time hugging me,
    And he’ll never push those laws for me.
    Uh, Bush loves me?
    Uh, Bush loves me?
    Uh, Bush loves me?
    Karl Rove tells me so.

  • @1 petorado – Forgive me for editing your post:

    Dobson’s willing to turn the other spread his cheek[s], as long as the money still keeps rolling in from the treasury.

    This confirm my guess at the Right-Wank reaction. I’ve got to start laying bets on this stuff.

    tAiO

    Dan, when’s the record coming out?

  • Of course, the other argument is, well, at least we have some shot with the Republicans and no shot with the Democrats.

    But Dobson as faith-based charlatan who would actually be upset if he “won” and could no longer con the faithful into financing the “fight” is probably pretty close to the truth.

    Besides, didn’t God put George Bush there for reasons we mere mortals can never truly understand???

  • You kidding me? It’s an open secret that all sides are purely self-serving. Dobson too. You really think Dobson cares about anything but getting his adherents to send tax-exempt dollars his way?

  • I thought their reaction might be something along these lines:

    1) insert fingers into ears

    2) squint eyes tightly shut

    3) repeat “LA-LA-LA-LA-LA!!!!” repeatedly, at top of lungs.

  • Dan, you are very musical today! I suggest a Casio keyboard and YouTube!? I think TimeLife might be interested in you work!

    Dobson and his ilk are heads of “churches” but they are not religious leaders. Just because thousands of sheeple think thou art speaking for god does not make it so. Reminds me of Life of Brian. Blessed are the cheese-makers! Dobson is 100% political and simply leverages the church to lend himself credibility and avoid taxation. It is quite disturbing when you think about it. A sad commentary on the state of religion in this country.

  • Of course Dobson and his pals don’t want anyone to bad-mouth the emperor’s new clothes; they’re the tailors.

  • The whole problem with “faith-based” politics is where the beliefs/faith are perceived to have come from. People with common sense and a healthy skepticism know that these beliefs originate in the minds of men (and not terribly honest men, at that) for their own selfish gain.

    Christians assume that their political beliefs are impressed upon them by the Holy Spirit. Since the Holy Spirit cannot lie or mislead, anything that contradicts their beliefs must come from “the deceiver”. Everything is predicated on the assumption that they have a direct line of communication with God.

    And the more convincing the argument that they’ve been duped (even with the Holy Spirit watching on), the more they take it simply as proof of just how powerful “the deceiver” is.

    To the Dobson crowd, this is just further evidence of a grand conspiracy to destroy their beliefs. Once you completely divorce yourself from reality, you are at the mercy of whomever and whatever you put your faith in.

  • To MNP and TIAO

    Well, I can’t sing worth a damn so you won’t be hearing me wailing.

    I get inspired by the subject matter and if I can find a suitable song to butcher MAD magazine style (was a voracious reader of Alfred E. Newman and crew as a kid and loved the song parodies.)

    What drives me is the same tradition of the midevial bard. When a king or noble or what passes for the jackass wannabes of today does something stupid, mock it in song (or in my case, lyrics.) There is one thing that I’ve learned from observing my rightwing friends is that they take themselves too damned seriously at times. Laughter is a great weapon to use against someone who takes themselves way too seriously.

    In the old days, according to my sister who was a classics major, nobles tried to avoid drawing the ire of the local bard (like “Oh Brave Brave Sir Robin…”) because they loved to protect their reputations. One good song of mockery would ruin the year of a pissant noble. Of course the odd time, they’d try to whack a bard, only to have other bards sing songs of mockery about them.

    Unlike Mark Russell, I can’t write one about any occassion, only those that “inspire” my childish anger.

    As for the topic of Dobson, the day he realizes that he’s been played for a fool (long time coming) is the day I’d be afraid to be a Repub (if I were one.)

  • Regarding JTK’s observation (post 14), why qualify “faith-based” with “politics”? Why is overloading a religion with political baggage for any reason any less rational than religious subscription in the first place? Must be our fate to spot the idiocy in behavior not our own.

  • Many of these power-access “religious leaders” like Dobson have forgotten that de-nile is a very long river to swim. Chances are they will drown before they make it to the shore of truth. -Kevo

    Oh, and by the way, Vote the Rascals Out in ’06 and ’08!

  • Dobson is trying to put out fires here, because he knows if his sheep take this book to heart, many of them will walk away not only from the GOP, but from greedy power brokers with delusions of grandeur like himself, Falwell, Perkins, Robertson, et al. Dobson doesn’t care if Bush misused his lemmings, because he is too, as are all these religious charlatans! The worst thing for Dobson and crew is if the people start figuring out that it’s not America they need to ‘take back for Christ,’ but rather Christianity itself for Christ away from scumbags like Dobson!

  • No one would confuse the narrow minded exclusiveness of a Pat Dobson or Jerry Fallwell for a truely spiritual human being any more than they would mistake Osama Bin Laden for one. Fortunately for us in the states the constitution keeps monoliths like P & J under wraps.

  • “The worst thing for Dobson and crew is if the people start figuring out that it’s not America they need to ‘take back for Christ,’ but rather Christianity itself for Christ away from scumbags like Dobson! ”

    I totally agree with #18. I just finished reading a book that is very enlightening on that very point called “Why the Christian right is wrong : a minister’s manifesto for taking back your faith, your flag, your future ” by Robin Meyers. I recommend it highly. For those of you who aren’t familiar with Robin Meyers, here’s a link…

    http://progressivechristian.blogspot.com/2005/04/dr-robin-meyers-speech.html

  • I agree that these guys like Dobson are in it to feed their greed. But surely another sin is involved here–pride. Who wants to be labeled the goat and the nut for all to see? Must be embarrassing…

  • The thing is… It doesn’t really matter why the so-called “Christian leaders” are dipping into de-nile; it’s enough that they *are*. Their followers are likely to take their cues from what such as Dobson et all say — saves them reading and “digesting” the book for themselves…

  • It’s soo easy to blame victims. Let’s not forget that Bush and Co., including Rove, have never changed their stripes.

    Don’t forget that Exec.Order 13397 signed 3/7/06 put the Faith-based office under the authority of Dept. of Homeland Security. Follow the chain of command and you’ll see that the President is in direct control of ANY organization that recieved FB funds.

    Instead of blaming Christians for being gullible, shouldn’t we all be thinking about the emerging Pastors as spys and the police state? Check out
    http://www.bigstory.us/churches/ChurchDHS.html
    for details.

  • They won’t give up on the GOP no matter what, no matter what they say. They need the GOP like the GOP needs them. They have too much tied up in the party to just walk away. If they did they would have nothing, and they know it. I would say it is a symbotic relationship but frankly it is more parasitic on both sides part because it is so unhealthy – they both gain something but neither can be as effective without the other.

    Any anyway, people really, really dislike it when one of their own either turns on them or chooses come out from groupthink.

  • I am curious as to how a lot of you come to the conclusion that Dr. Dobson is solely in it for the money and doesn’t have a genuine concern for the family and society in America?

  • Comments are closed.