This Week in God

The God machine was a little distracted by the major political events of the week, so this week’s stories have a decidedly political bent. First up, did the “God gap” between Dems and Republicans narrow this year? Well, maybe a little. The front page of the WaPo today notes, “Democrats Win Bigger Share of Religious Vote.” The only problem is that the “bigger share” wasn’t that big.

As the results of the midterm elections sank in this week, religious leaders across the ideological spectrum found something they could agree on: The “God gap” in American politics has narrowed substantially.

Religious liberals contended that a concerted effort by Democrats since 2004 to appeal to people of faith had worked minor wonders, if not electoral miracles, in races across the country.

Religious conservatives disagreed, arguing that the Republican Party lost religious voters rather than the Democrats winning them.

Either way, the national exit polls told a dramatic story of changing views in the pews: Democrats recaptured the Catholic vote they had lost two years ago. They sliced the GOP’s advantage among weekly churchgoers to 12 percentage points, down from 18 points in 2004 congressional races and 22 points in the 2004 presidential contest. Democrats even siphoned off a portion of the Republican Party’s most loyal base, white evangelical Protestants.

“The God gap definitely didn’t disappear, but it did narrow,” argued Democratic pollster Celinda Lake. “And it narrowed in part because evangelical voters had major questions about the direction of the country.”

That certainly sounds encouraging, but the news shouldn’t be overstated. When the AP reported this week that “nearly a third” of white evangelicals voted for Democrats on Tuesday, it was hailed as a seismic shift. It really wasn’t. Dems won 25% of the white evangelical vote in ’04, and 28% in ’06. Some on the left are arguing that these results prove Dems are making great gains among this constituency, and many on the right are arguing this proves the GOP is losing its theocratic base. I think they’re probably both wrong.

On the other hand, while white evangelical votes may not be changing much, their attitudes may be shifting in interesting ways.

A new poll from Beliefnet of evangelical Christians found a constituency whose political beliefs are in flux.

Significantly, about 60 percent of those polled in the Beliefnet survey said their views of the Republican Party had become less positive in recent years.

“It’s not that they are soured with the Republican approach to culture war issues like abortion, it’s that they are angry with them on issues such as Iraq and corruption,” said Steven Waldman, editor in chief of Beliefnet.com, a Web site on issues of faith.

As with other Americans, the Iraq war topped evangelicals’ list of electoral concerns, with 22.5 percent citing it as the issue that most affected their votes.

Also of interest, 46% of evangelicals said they believe Bill Clinton was as good a Christian, if not better, than George W. Bush, which is surprisingly high. For that matter, only 17% of evangelicals hold Jerry Falwell in a favorable light. Not bad, not bad.

And before we wrap up This Week in God, a friend of mine noted yesterday that Sen.-elect Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) appears to be the very first self-professed atheist elected to the U.S. Senate. I’m a little hazy on the specifics of Sanders’ faith — congressional directories generally list him as Jewish — but there’s some evidence to suggest that Sanders is, in fact, a non-believer.

The House has its first Muslim, the Senate has its first atheist … three cheers for religious diversity on the Hill.

Religious conservatives disagreed, arguing that the Republican Party lost religious voters rather than the Democrats winning them.

That’s ok. If we’re talking about those who usually vote, choosing not to vote for someone is voting in a way, especially if those evangelicals are well-educated and concerned about their government.

  • Also of interest, 46% of evangelicals said they believe Bill Clinton was as good a Christian, if not better, than George W. Bush

    Sorry, I don’t see this as anything but further evidence that your average Evan. is a twit. How can there be any doubt that Shrub is a murderous, greedy thug who would happily strap Jesus to a waterboard? After all Jesus is from the Middle East, espoused radical ideas, hung out with social outcasts and once trashed a house of worship. Oh, I keep forgetting (because I have a life) that Clinton once lied about a blow job. I guess that balances out the incompetence that allowed Sept. 11th to occur and lying about it, lying us into an invasion that killed, maimed and displaced hundreds of thousands of people, sitting on the ranch while New Orleans turned into a fat steaming slice of hell…

    Sorry, did I say the average Evan. was a twit? I was wrong. I meant 24k, full bore, non-stop fuckwit, with heaping order of arse hattery on the side.

  • TAIO-R pretty much said it all about the comparison between Clinton and BushCo.

    And here’s a toast to Bernie Sanders, who I’ve enjoyed hearing from every Friday for years now on Thom Hartmann’s Air America radio program. We need more like him. I hope the Democratic senators will welcome him with open arms and good hearts, even though his intelligence and integrity may put some of them to shame.

  • Not all Christians are evangelicals. Many non-evangelical Christians who were former Republicans either voted Democrat or stayed home on Tuesday.

  • “only 17% of evangelicals hold Jerry Falwell in a favorable light.” – CB

    Now if only they’d stop throwing money at him so he’d have to go out and get a real job…. ;(

  • Please note there is no necessary contradiction in being Jewish and an atheist, such as Woody Allen, David Cross, Isaac Asimov, Irving Berlin, and Lewis Black. See the Wikipedia article on “Atheist Jew”.

  • Wow, imagine that, not worrying about issues that don’t affect you (i.e., sex among consenting adults), and instead worrying about issues that do.

  • Also of interest, 46% of evangelicals said they believe Bill Clinton was as good a Christian, if not better, than George W. Bush, which is surprisingly high.

    That’s because they can see the hypocrisy.

    CB- You could have put this right at the front of your post. It’s an interesting point to start the discussion with.

  • Actually it would be a good development if the Theocrats reasserted themselves and took even more control of the Republican Party. Then they could have eternal war and intrigue with the Neocons and there would be even more room in the Democratic Party for rational thought and reasonable action. Its issues and answers not liberal/conservative i.d. games.

  • CB- You could have put this right at the front of your post. It’s an interesting point to start the discussion with.

    Nevertheless, a masterfully composed set of insights and pieces of info, CB. Thanks from all of us in Blogtopia for all you’ve done to keep us on the ball!

  • The Columbus Dispatch’s take on the election results in its weekly Faith and Values section was interesting.

    http://www.dispatch.com/news/religion/faith-story.php?story=dispatch/2006/11/10/20061110-C1-02.html

    The conservative side…

    For Republicans, Tuesday’s election was a defeat of almost biblical proportions. But for conservative religious leaders like the Rev. Russell Johnson, who staunchly backed defeated GOP gubernatorial candidate J. Kenneth Blackwell, there will be another day.

    “We read the Bible and take it literally, and understand that there are crucifixions that do precede resurrections,” said Johnson, pastor of Fairfield Christian Church in Lancaster and founder of the conservative Ohio Restoration Project.

    [Rev. Rod] Parsley accused the GOP of turning on values voters.

    “We didn’t abandon a political party, but it certainly seems as though much of the Republican Party abandoned us,” he said. “We’ll be watching to see who stays true to their campaign rhetoric while in office and who proves to be faux candidates.”

    The progressive side…

    [In] races for elective office, religious influence was big, as people voted their values, said the Rev. Tim Ahrens, senior minister of First Congregational Church Downtown and a founder of We Believe Ohio, a liberal-leaning social-justice movement.

    “No matter where people were on the theological spectrum, people voted their really major values, concern for the poor, economic justice, peace in Iraq; Iraq has really troubled this nation,” he said.

    Ahrens cited pre- and post-election polls that show the war was the moral issue that most influenced voters.

    Eric McFadden, national field director for the social-justice organization Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, said the war and Ohio’s sagging economy brought a shift in the Roman Catholic vote in the state.

    The National Election Pool exit polls, conducted by several major news organizations, found that the state’s Catholics turned to the Democrats this year, after giving President Bush a majority of their votes in 2004.

    Adnan Mirza, executive director of the Ohio chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said that exit polls conducted by CAIR showed 90 percent of Muslims voting Democratic in the races for governor, the U.S. House and Senate, and Franklin County commissioner.

    “I think you can almost say it was a mandate on issues that had been implemented by the Bush administration,” he said.

    “To see the first Muslim being elected to the House, especially against the personal attacks he had to face in this election, speaks volumes.”

    If only this had happened two years ago.

  • Apologies to all, but my anti-religion gene is coming on strong. Yes, one can leave the religion was born into (no fault of the child), but it’s very difficult. Hubby was raised catholic, myself mormon. Both of us recovering nicely, thank you, but it took a lot of hard work for both of us before we reached the point of being (mostly) free from that indoctrination.

    I’ve come to the point where I don’t think there is any such thing as deity, but if there is then the Taoists (aside from Buddhists, the only religion I will give deference and respect to) are closer than anything humanity has come to comprehending or describing such a deity. Hubby is coming to that point slowly (I’m having to get him to read a lot of new material, and think about these things), but he’s coming along.

    If Haggard is not willing to look into his own religion, let alone other religions and many philosophical traditions, then he deserves whatever he goes through.

    The human mind is a terrible thing to waste. To waste it in x-tianity (let alone his chosen virulent brand of x-tianity) goes beyond waste–it’s masochism, plain and simple.

  • Second try (oh, oh, oh-range )…
    Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) appears to be the very first self-professed atheist elected to the U.S. Senate. I’m a little hazy on the specifics of Sanders’ faith — congressional directories generally list him as Jewish — Morbo

    Depends on the POV and what one considers important. In Europe, we used to think of *blood* ties first; religious allegiance tended to be assumed, because each country was likely to be pretty homogenous — R. Catholic and Protestant being the only division line (if at all; in places like Poland, Spain, Italy and Ireland RC is so overwhelmingly the “majority religion” that others don’t count at all)

    So, in Poland, I’m half Polish and half Jewish (even though I’m *wholly an atheist*), and had many a bloody nose as a child/teenager to prove that anti-Semitism was alive and kicking even after WWII (with very few Jews left around to kick). Blood ties was also the basis of Hitler’s distinction (though, even Poles think he went too far, digging “into the 5th generation”). In practice, I’m considered a Jew, because the “bad genes” overcome the “good”, even if, statistically, it’s 50-50.

    My (American) husband, OTOH, looks at the country of origin first, at the religious allegiance second and and on blood ties third (if at all). To him, I’m Polish — something that no Pole would ever accept as true, except on the passport. Neither would any Jew, since I’m half-Jewish *on my Mother’s side* Like the erst-while VA Senator, Felix Macacawitz Allen ).

    It could be that US is such a mix, blood-wise, it’s difficult to tell who’s what, and religious allegiance is easier to ascertain. Sanders’ affiliaton listing must have used the “European model” At the same time, he must have felt pretty strongly about his no-church-affiliation, for it to be known that he’s an atheist

    All the same, I’d love to see the day when we really-and-truly divorce the church and the state, and the “faith question” disappears from the forms one has to fill out. Ditto for the blood-origin/skin color. Why is a black man and a convert to Islam more newsworthy than someone with 15 different strains in his blood-stream and Christian-fringe in the faith box?

  • I’m a far-left Buddhist atheist, so I don’t have a lot of evangelical friends, but it’s notable, I think, that three such friends spoke to me before the election and volunteered their stories of how the egregious failure of BushCo to adhere to conservative principals of fiscal responsibility, their tragic parade of mistakes in Iraq, and the endless depths of Republican hypocrisy and corruption were leading my friends to re-assess, not just their loyalty to the Republican Party, but their assumption that their Christian faith was an reliable guide to political choices. Their radical disillusion had, in fact, made them more tolerant of people who held ideas that they found un-Christian but who were not hypocritical about those ideas and refused to dissemble. These people felt used by the Rethugs, and they have the intelligence to realize that what allowed them to be so used was their single-issue focus.

    Let’s not ignore the possibility that even evangelical Christians are able to reassess their positions and adjust them to the insistent demands of reality.

    Richard

  • Comments are closed.