Secretaries of State used to be above politics

The WaPo had an interesting item over the weekend noting Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s busy schedule of late. That makes sense — there’s a war in Iraq, the North Korean crisis is simmering to a boil, there’s a major transition underway at the United Nations, and there are ample challenges that require the attention of the nation’s chief diplomat.

Except, as it turns out, Rice isn’t busy because of her official responsibilities; she’s busy using her traditionally above-the-fray position for partisan ends.

Two weeks before crucial midterm elections that could tip the balance of power in Congress, Rice has been on a media blitz that appears aimed mainly at conservative media outlets, particularly radio talk shows. Secretary of state is traditionally a nonpartisan position, and Rice’s media itinerary differs sharply from the practice of her predecessors during election campaigns, according to State Department records.

Rice has given nine interviews on radio, starting with three appearances on Oct. 24 during “Radio Day,” when 42 radio hosts, most of them conservatives, were invited to the White House to spread the administration’s message to President Bush’s political base.

In the past two days, Rice has appeared on four radio shows, including that of Ingraham, a best-selling author for her books that attack liberal “elites”; Bill Cunningham, a Cincinnati conservative; and Glenn Beck, another conservative, who appears on nearly 200 stations.

Rice also appeared in the past week on CNBC’s “Kudlow and Company,” hosted by conservative economic commentator Lawrence Kudlow, and “Morning in America,” a radio show hosted by prominent Republican William Bennett.

Was this some kind of diplomatic endeavor, with Rice explaining complex foreign policy matters to the public? Not so much. She touted the president as a “visionary,” while being lavished with praise from far-right media personalities. Glenn Beck, for example, called her “one of the most remarkable people of our age” during one of these hard-hitting interviews.

State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said the confluence of media spots with the election was “coincidental.” That McCormack has such a dry wit, doesn’t he?

Two points to consider here.

First, there is no precedent for these kinds of political activities.

In the 2002 midterm elections, Powell did just two spots — with National Public Radio and Ellen Ratner, who says she is “liberal and proud,” on Talk Radio News. In 2004, Powell appeared only on Bennett’s show and CNBC. Albright, who frequently said she had her “partisan instincts surgically removed” when she became secretary, did a couple of interviews on network television before the 2000 elections and none before the 1998 elections.

“The tradition for secretaries of state has been to stay out of partisan politics and to stay above the fray,” said Karl F. Inderfurth, director of the international affairs graduate program at George Washington University and assistant secretary of state under Albright. “They take office as the secretary of state of the United States of America, not of the Republican or Democratic party.”

Typical pre-9/11 thinking from the reality-based community.

Second, it’s a clear pattern for Rice — she’s always chosen partisan politics over her professional duties. Indeed, immediately before the 2004 election, Rice cleared her schedule to hit the campaign trail, which no National Security Aide had ever done before. Given the circumstances at the time, it showed bizarre judgment.

On the same day Rice gave a political speech in Ohio, U.S. military conducted operations against Zarqawi.

On the same day Rice gave a political speech in Ohio, Poland Announced it would be pulling troops from Iraq.

On the same day Rice gave a political speech in North Carolina, U.S. was accused of doling out hundreds of millions in unaccountable Iraqi projects.

On the same day Rice gave a political speech in Ohio, Europeans negotiated with Iran to end its nuclear program.

And now history is repeating itself, with Rice chatting up far-right talk-show hosts in the weeks leading up to the elections. The hackocracy lives.

No policy apparatus, everything is political. Nuff said. I realize Rice is SOS (a formerly important position) but what about the POTUS? All I have heard from him over the last week or so is that he is campaigning in Dark Red States or clearing brush in Crawford. Shouldn’t a country at war expect 100% of the commander in chief’s attention to be focused on leading the country and not their party?

  • One of the many problems with the Bushites is that they confuse what is good for Bush’s personal partisan interests with what is best for the country.

    They think that both are the same.

    From their perspective, why not campaign for Rs. Who cares that it is not something that grownups agree with. It is in their short term interest to go partisan at all levels eventhough the same is bad for the institutions of our democracy.

    Oh well, it is up to others to practice personal responsibility and other folks can clean up the mess when they leave office.

  • On the same day Rice was buying shoes and attending a Broadway musical in New York City, people were drowning in New Orleans.

  • Two thoughts:

    – Yet another hallowed tradition tossed out the window by America’s “conservative” party.

    – I know this is part of the woodwork by now, but I’m still amazed by the fact that the president has a network of media outlets at his beck and call. Isn’t this kind of, I don’t know, banana-republic-ish? Putinesque, if you will?
    I don’t remember Clinton, for example, being able to count on 42 (or even one) radio hosts being willing to come to the White House, listen to his talking points, and happily spew them out on the airwaves in the final hours before a close election. Even avowedly liberal commentators make a point of being proudly skeptical of everyone and everything.

    Why do we tolerate this?

  • Now that the two parties no longer ‘agree’ on Foreign Policy there is no reason why the cabinet officer supposedly in charge of it should not be involved in politics.

    So, while the Bushites and their Republican’t rubber stamp Congress use foreign policy to whip up THE BASE, the Democrats just wish that there were adults in charge.

    Which of course excludes Dr. Condi (I have no imagination) Rice.

  • Wow. And to think that all this time, I’ve been comparing Bush to Hitler.

    Adolf never had such a dedicated kiss-up. If he had, he might have babbled the English into submission, rather than waging war against them.

    And as for Rice herself? Dr. Condi doesn’t work any more. Let’s just use “Dr. Con.” It’ll be nice, when other diplomatic heads start shunning the little twit….

  • Since this is clearly partisan political campaigning rather than policy the question I have is “why am I paying for it?” To some extent there has always been a wink and a nod to campaigning under the guise of policy speeches, but apparently that too is pre-9/11 thinking, how about having the RNC cough up the coin for RIce and w’s travel costs – personally I’d classify this as “waste, fraud and abuse”.

  • Gee, Eddiejoe – you make Dr. Rice sound insensitive. The fact that she was shoe-shopping in the Big Apple while people were waving for help from their rooftops in the Ninth Ward of New Orleans probably IS a coincidence. A person has to be SOMEWHERE when big events happen, and sometimes it just looks bad.

    For example, where was she while her Israeli buddies were smashing the bejesus out of Lebanon? Playing piano for the Asian Foreign Ministers in Kuala Lumpur, that’s where. And I’d have you know it was a very sombre piece, by Brahms, in honour of the solemnity of events.

    I hope I’ve set you straight, and there’ll be more evenhanded consideration of Condoleezza Rice’s efforts to show the world that politickin’ is a full-time job, not a hobby.

  • What? You expect good manners and ethics from thieves, liars, hypocrites, perverts, and war criminals? Get a grip man.
    We’ve got one more day of non stop bashing to do, then we can have discussions.

    Attack, attack, attack.
    Get rid of the Republican thieves, liars, hypocrites, perverts, and war criminals. Pull the lever for the Democratic ticket. Pull it hard, and tell Bush and the Republicans to go straight to hell.

  • Kindasleezy was also doing this in 04 when she was National Security “Advisor” and it was pointed out at the time that that position had previously been nonpolitical as well.

    Heck, it’s probably safer for us all when this not overbright PhD is on the road politicking….

  • From the WaPo article:

    Bloomberg TV interviewer Al Hunt, who was once a liberal commentator for the Wall Street Journal and CNN, asked Rice about the rash of interviews for a program that will appear this weekend and whether they were tied to the election.

    “No, I’m just out doing what I always do, just trying to explain American policy,” Rice said. “I’ve always thought that it’s an important part of the role of the secretary of state to get out and talk to Americans in any way possible about our foreign policy.”

    So if Rice is only doing what she always thought was important how then does she explain this?

    Rice did 12 interviews in 11 days through Friday, an unusually busy schedule when Rice is not traveling. Ten of the sessions were with conservative hosts, including some in small heartland markets.

    By comparison, Rice did 11 interviews with individual U.S. and foreign media in all of November 2005, most of them during a trip to the Middle East. None of the sessions were with conservative talk show hosts.

  • Gee. You’d think an administration that is so into “values” wouldn’t have quite so many whores. I thought the position of WH Press Secretary was a-political until then they sent Tony Blowjob out to pander to the masses. However, it just goes to show how toxic their sock monkey has become. The only place he’s still welcome are the Deep Red = Brain Dead parts of the country.

    Let’s just use “Dr. Con.”

    [Steve]

    Excellent.

  • One of the many problems with the Bushites is that they confuse what is good for Bush’s personal partisan interests with what is best for the country.

    They think that both are the same.

    I’m not so sure. It seems to me they really consider the one to be paramount, and the other irrelevant. Maybe that’s what happens when you decide God put you where you are — it becomes all about you.

  • Condi has been Bush’s most loyal office wife and BFF ever. She got her jobs because she plays the role of decoration really well and can be counted on to polish Bush’s brass without complaint anytime, anywhere.

    Doing a heckuva job, isn’t she? 🙁

  • Did any of you expect fair play? Condi Rice is the neo-con from hell. I am not surprised that she only speaks to the republican base, because she has nothing intelligent to say. Non partisan? I don’t think so. She is as blind and deaf as anyone I have ever encountered. This is a woman, blinded by the power around her, who has seriously lost her way. Did any of you expect to hear her on Air America? She is sleezey and insensitive and not very bright. Only stupid people will not admit when they have made a mistake and need a change in direction. That makes “Dr.” Rice just another wise fool. The world is full of them, and if I personally heard her on my radio station, I would turn her off. I have heard enough to last me a lifetime.

  • Comments are closed.