The September Fund’s new ad

Because I live in a state bordering New York, I see a lot of New York candidates’ ads on TV, and I have to say, Eliot Spitzer’s (D) commercials are really good. They’re different from traditional campaign spots, and there’s a reason — they were written by a screenwriter whose background isn’t in politics, it’s in Madison Avenue advertising. His name is [tag]Jimmy Siegel[/tag].

Mr. [tag]Spitzer[/tag] had been approached by political consultants who were hungry for business and was wary of another pitch. “He looked at me like, ‘Who the hell are you?'” Mr. Siegel said, recounting his conversation.

A half a year later, Mr. Siegel has become a crucial component of Mr. Spitzer’s election efforts. He’s the brains behind Mr. Spitzer’s $10 million ad campaign, whose stylized and poignant appeal has attracted some nationwide notice. Some of the Democratic Party’s leading lights, like Rep. Rahm Emanuel, Senator Clinton, and Governor Cuomo, have personally complimented him on his ads, Mr. Siegel said. Governors have tried to hire him, and he’s planning a political advertising business that will cater mostly to Democrats.

“Jimmy’s work is thoughtful, sharp, and different,” said Mr. Spitzer’s campaign manager, Ryan Toohey.

Frankly, “thoughtful, sharp, and different” sounds pretty good right now, especially when it comes to media consulting. I’m reminded of Amy Sullivan’s exceptional article last year about how absurd it is for Democratic candidates to keep hiring campaign advisors who lose races year after year. She highlighted a number of problems, but was particularly right about the consultants who’ve been creating Dems’ ads for years.

Siegel, with a non-political background, is approaching this from a different angle. He’s selling a product to the public — though in this case, “product” refers to a candidate, and the “public” refers to voters.

Thankfully, voters outside New York are about to see Siegel’s latest work.

This is the new ad from the [tag]September Fund[/tag], a Democratic 527 group led by Harold Ickes, which is working to help elect Dem congressional candidates.

(Sorry: I don’t yet have a transcript for people who can’t watch videos online at work.)

Kos said the ad “is good. Really, really good. Phenomenal, in fact.” Moreover, rumor has it that it tested well in focus groups.

I like it, not just the message, but the style. How about you?

Love it! Simple, brief, to the point!

  • If I may borrow a phrase from the USMC: Boo-yah!
    Also
    Bravo! I started laughing the minute it began to roll. It’s also nice to see that one can create an ad that makes your opponent look like a, well, a vegetable, without the distortion and lies the Refugs are so fond of.

  • Exactly what this nation needs! The more people from outside the usual suspects and beltway insiders getting involved with politics and pubic policy the better off this nation will be. Next, we need to get a new group of TV pundits this refreshing.

  • Exactly what this nation needs! The more people from outside the usual suspects and beltway insiders getting involved with politics and public policy the better off this nation will be. Next, we need to get a new group of TV pundits this refreshing.

  • Hear, hear! Whichever Dem gets the nomination in ’08 (ohh, please, let it be Richardson, he’d be a great president!) Jimmy Siegel needs to be on board with that campaign!

  • I too like it for all of the resons mentioned above, and because it points to specific issues that are on the minds of voters and where Democrats should and in their best moments do offer clear alternatives to Republicans.
    Contrast it with the ads for Scott Kleeb (D. candidate for Nebraska’s 3rd Congressional district) which also appear on Daily Kos today. In one Kleeb cites his family background on farms and military bases to declare his understanding the importance of protecting “farmlands” and “the homeland,” and offers only the vague promise of a voice “to put our farms and families first.” In the other, he promises not to put “special interests” ahead of ordinary Nebraskans, without identifying what those interests are. I am not doubting the guy’s sincerity, but I don’t think these ads convey anything that necessarily distinguishes him from Republicans, who also can claim to put people and not special interests first.

  • I didn’t like it. Maybe if there weren’t that long pause in “from this — bush”. But I guess if Jon Stewart’s over-the-topness can be successful, so too might this be.

    Anyway — Bush isn’t running this time. Does it really make a difference if ads like this are on the air? I wonder if it would be possible to explain the key importance of giving the Democrats subpoena power in a 30 second spot.

  • Anyone care to clarify whether Allen K. is himself a (ahem) “plant”?

    Yes, Allen, the Dems should try to wedge an abstruse and arcane (to the general public)procedural discussion into a 30-sec spot. Brilliant suggestion.

    And, yeah, since Bush’s approval numbers are still in the toilet, we shouldn’t make any effort to wrap him around the GOP’s neck. Naaaah. Bad form, that.

  • Love this!!! At last, the chance to chuckle with a little wry humor, wit and originality. Siegel rules!!!

  • Bush isn’t running this time. Does it really make a difference if ads like this are on the air?

    Tarred with the same brush. Guilt by association. Birds of a feather. 200 ton albatross.

    In a way, Bush is running this time around. It comes of exerting so much control over his party that they all bleat out the same garbage, refuse to answer the same questions, make a big deal about being loyal to America when they really mean G.W. Bush.

    In addition, Bush really needs to keep a GOP majority or he’ll be running scared.

  • Excellent. I hope we’ll see more of Siegel’s work. It’s about time the party broadened it’s network beyond the usual suspects.

  • Loved it! More, please!

    If you ain’t Moses, you sure as heck can’t get any answers from a bush…

  • HIlarious, but in a way… Huh? I mean, it’s a great joke, but it doesn’t sell anyone’s qualities. It’s still the Dems saying, Hey, we’re NOT them! I am neither a plant nor a Republican, but the Democrats wear simlar stuffed shirts. Can some politician please SAY something? They suck and we’re not them is not enough. If it works and we get turnover, great, but I’m not interested in the same old stuff with a different party name attached. I’d like to see ’em all get booted and start over. If the ideas are fresh and the folks who get in aren’t beholden to corporations, I don’t care what party they belong to. If they’re ready to really rumble, to get things done instead of pork barreling and politicking, great. We need Kucinich principles with the ability to get things done. But I’m tangenting. I’m just a little sad that folks are praising this ad without looking at advertising/speechifying a little more deeply. And that the one person who spoke out was labeled a plant. Maybe he is; maybe not. That said, if I lived in NY, I’d be voting for Spitzer. If the Dems run Hillary in 2008, I’ll be pissed. Mobilize the base, all right…

  • You can find Siegel’s other ads on Spitzer’s site. I think the “Let it Shine” and “Responsibility Road” are just pure genius! It’s not just the message in these ads (which is good), but it’s the whole package – music, images, transitions.

  • Anyone care to clarify whether Allen K. is himself a (ahem) “plant”?
    Yes, Allen, the Dems should try to wedge an abstruse and arcane (to the general public)procedural discussion into a 30-sec spot. Brilliant suggestion.
    And, yeah, since Bush’s approval numbers are still in the toilet, we shouldn’t make any effort to wrap him around the GOP’s neck. Naaaah. Bad form, that.

    “Hmm. You know, having watched this ad, I agree that Bush sucks. Luckily, my particular local Republican representative (e.g. Chafee) doesn’t seem like that bad a guy, so I’ll probably vote for him again.”

    My point was just that a whole lot of people are likely to not change their behavior because of this ad, and I suggested one avenue by which they might be convinced to. For that, I get accused of being a plant. I now recuse myself from your circular firing squad, jerk.

  • Re “abstruse and arcane”, I quote Krugman today:

    “Last year The Boston Globe offered an illuminating comparison: when Bill Clinton was president, the House took 140 hours of sworn testimony into whether Mr. Clinton had used the White House Christmas list to identify possible Democratic donors. But in 2004 and 2005, a House committee took only 12 hours of testimony on the abuses at Abu Ghraib.”

    Could that fit in 30 seconds, do you think?

  • I believe (or at least hope) that the American people can see the connection between the current administration and many current Republican Congressional and Senatorial candidates. While his staff and cabinet have done a reasonable job of hiding his feckless, intolerant and moronic tendencies, Bush’s true nature was impossible to mask forever. The ad is right on the mark and truly timely. His name is on no ballot but that fact is completely irrelevant.

  • Comments are closed.